Computational modeling reveals a vital role for proximity-driven additive and synergistic cell-cell interactions in increasing cancer invasiveness
Source abstract
Abstract
Solid-tumor cell invasion typically occurs by collective migration of attached cell-cohorts, yet we show here that indirect cell-interactions through the substrate can also drive invasiveness. We have previously shown that well-spaced, invasive cancer cells push-into and indent gels to depths of 10 µm, while closely adjacent, non-contacting cancer cells may reach up to 18 µm, potentially relying on cell-cell interactions through the gel-substrate. To test that, we developed finite element models of indenting cells, using experimental gel mechanics, cell mechanostructure, and force magnitudes. We show that under 50-350 nN of combined traction and normal forces, a stiff nucleus-region is essential in facilitating 5-10 µm single-cell indentations, while uniformly soft cells attain 1.6-fold smaller indentations. We observe that indentation depths of cells in close proximity (0.5-50 µm distance) increase relative to well-spaced cells, due to additive, continuum mechanics-driven contributions. Specifically, 2-3 cells applying 220 nN normal forces gained up to 3% in depth, which interestingly increased to 7.8% when two cells, 10 µm apart, applied unequal force-magnitudes (i.e., 220 and 350 nN). Such additive, energy-free contributions can reduce cell mechanical energy -output required for invasiveness, yet the experimentally observed 10-18 µm depths likely necessitate synergistic, mechanobiological changes, which may be mechanically triggered. We note that nucleus stiffening or cytoplasm softening by 25-50% increased indentation depths by only 1-7%, while depths increase nearly linearly with force-magnitude even to two-fold levels. Hence, cell-proximity triggered, synergistic and additive cell-interactions through the substrate can drive collective cancer-cell invasiveness, even without direct cell-cell interactions. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Metastatic cancer invasion typically occurs collectively in attached cell-cohorts. We have previously shown increased invasiveness in closely adjacent cancer cells that are able to push-into and indent soft-gels more deeply than single, well-spaced cells. Using finite element models, we reveal mechanisms of cell-proximity driven invasiveness, demonstrating an important role for the stiff nucleus. Cell-proximity can additively induce small increase in indentation depth via continuum mechanics contributions, especially when adjacent cells apply unequal forces, and without requiring increased cell-mechanical-energy-output. Concurrently, proximity-triggered synergistic interactions that produce changes in cell mechanics or capacity for increased force-levels can facilitate deep invasive-indentations. Thus, we reveal concurrent additive and synergistic mechanisms to drive collective cancer-cell invasiveness even without direct cell-cell interactions.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Cancer Cells and Metastasis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. Do all roads lead to Rome? Routes to metastasis development10.1002/ijc.26027 ↗
2. Cell–cell mechanical communication in cancer10.1007/s12195-018-00564-x ↗
3. Molecular mechanisms of cancer cell invasion and plasticity10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07231.x ↗
4. Distinct roles of tumor associated mutations in collective cell migration10.1038/s41598-021-89130-6 ↗
5. Proximity of metastatic cells enhances their mechanobiological invasiveness10.1007/s10439-017-1814-8 ↗
6. Taxol reduces synergistic, mechanobiological invasiveness of metastatic cells10.1088/2057-1739/aa8c0b ↗
7. Intravital multiphoton imaging reveals multicellular streaming as a crucial component of in vivo cell migration in human breast tumors10.4161/intv.25294 ↗
8. Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients10.1038/nnano.2007.388 ↗
9. Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence10.1529/biophysj.104.045476 ↗
10. Intracellular Mechanics and Activity of Breast Cancer Cells Correlate with Metastatic Potential10.1007/s12013-012-9356-z ↗
11. Experimental evidence of strong anomalous diffusion in living cells10.1103/PhysRevE.81.020903 ↗
12. Cellular traction stresses increase with increasing metastatic potential10.1371/journal.pone.0032572 ↗
13. Metastatic cancer cells tenaciously indent impenetrable, soft substrates10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/035022 ↗
14. Migration in confined 3D environments is determined by a combination of adhesiveness, nuclear volume, contractility, and cell stiffness10.1016/j.bpj.2015.07.025 ↗
15. Metastatic breast cancer cells adhere strongly on varying stiffness substrates, initially without adjusting their morphology10.1007/s10237-016-0864-4 ↗
16. Actin as a target to reduce cell invasiveness in initial stages of metastasis10.1007/s10439-020-02679-7 ↗
17. 3D Traction forces in cancer cell invasion10.1371/journal.pone.0033476 ↗
18. Rapid cancer diagnosis and early prognosis of metastatic risk based on mechanical invasiveness of sampled cells10.1007/s10439-020-02547-4 ↗
19. Quantitative measures to reveal coordinated cytoskeleton-nucleus reorganization during in vitro invasion of cancer cells10.1088/1367-2630/17/4/043010 ↗
20. Cell-gel mechanical interactions as an approach to rapidly and quantitatively reveal invasive subpopulations of metastatic cancer cells10.1089/ten.tec.2016.0424 ↗
21. Traction fields, moments, and strain energy that cells exert on their surroundings10.1152/ajpcell.00270.2001 ↗
22. Asymmetry in traction forces produced by migrating preadipocytes is bounded to 33%10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.05.013 ↗
23. Modeling force application configurations and morphologies required for cancer cell invasion10.1007/s10237-021-01441-9 ↗
24. Rapid, quantitative prediction of tumor invasiveness in non-melanoma skin cancers using mechanobiology-based assay10.1007/s10237-021-01475-z ↗
25. Mechanosensing during directed cell migration requires dynamic actin polymerization at focal adhesions10.1083/jcb.201902101 ↗
26. Mechanical interactions of invasive cancer cells through their substrate evolve from additive to synergistic10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110759 ↗
27. Vascular smooth muscle cell Durotaxis depends on substrate stiffness gradient strength10.1016/j.bpj.2009.06.021 ↗
28. Mechanisms of mechanical signaling in development and disease10.1242/jcs.071001 ↗
29. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype10.1016/j.ccr.2005.08.010 ↗
30. A mechanobiological model to study upstream cell migration guided by tensotaxis10.1007/s10237-020-01289-5 ↗
31. Modeling migration in cell colonies in two and three dimensional substrates with varying stiffnesses10.1186/s40482-015-0005-9 ↗
32. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76279-5 ↗
33. Interstitial flow influences direction of tumor cell migration through competing mechanisms10.1073/pnas.1103581108 ↗
34. Ratio of total traction force to projected cell area is preserved in differentiating adipocytes10.1039/C5IB00056D ↗
35. Traction force microscopy for noninvasive imaging of cell forces10.1007/978-3-319-95294-9_15 ↗
36. Matrix strains induced by cells: computing how far cells can feel10.1007/s12195-009-0052-z ↗
37. Finite element analysis reveals an important role for cell morphology in response to mechanical compression10.1007/s10237-019-01276-5 ↗
38. FEBio: finite elements for biomechanics10.1115/1.4005694 ↗
39. Live cells exert 3-dimensional traction forces on their substrata10.1007/s12195-009-0082-6 ↗
40. BIOPHYSICS Push it, pull it10.1038/470340a ↗
41. How deeply cells feel: methods for thin gels10.1088/0953-8984/22/19/194116 ↗
42. Mechanical interaction of metastatic cancer cells with a soft gel10.1016/j.piutam.2014.12.023 ↗
43. A phenomenological model for cell and nucleus deformation during cancer metastasis10.1007/s10237-018-1036-5 ↗
44. A serial micropipette microfluidic device with applications to cancer cell repeated deformation studies10.1039/c3ib40128f ↗
45. Nuclear structure in cancer cells10.1038/nrc1430 ↗
46. Nuclear envelope composition determines the ability of neutrophil-type cells to passage through micron-scale constrictions10.1074/jbc.M112.441535 ↗
47. Overexpression of alpha4 chain-containing laminins in human glial tumors identified by gene microarray analysis
48. Overexpression of laminin alpha1 chain in colonic cancer cells induces an increase in tumor growth10.1002/ijc.1444 ↗
49. Lamin A/C protein is overexpressed in tissue-invading prostate cancer and promotes prostate cancer cell growth, migration and invasion through the PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathway10.1093/carcin/bgs022 ↗
50. Breast cancer cells adapt contractile forces to overcome steric hindrance10.1016/j.bpj.2019.02.029 ↗
51. Sensing traction force on the matrix induces Cell-Cell distant mechanical communications for self-assembly10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01035 ↗
52. Microfluidic 3D cell culture: Potential application for tissue-based bioassays10.4155/bio.12.133 ↗
53. Development of a quantitative method to analyse tumour cell invasion in organotypic culture10.1002/path.1716 ↗
54. ECM degradation assays for analyzing local cell invasion10.1007/978-1-59745-413-1_15 ↗
55. Reassessing epithelial to mesenchymal transition as a prerequisite for carcinoma invasion and metastasis10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0410 ↗
56. Classifying collective cancer cell invasion10.1038/ncb2548 ↗
57. Breast cancer stem cells: mechanobiology reveals highly invasive cancer cell subpopulations10.1007/s00018-022-04181-w ↗
58. King · 2006
59. Microfluidic chip bio-sensor for detection of cancer cells
60. Viscoelastic properties of normal and cancerous human breast cells are affected differently by contact to adjacent cells10.1016/j.actbio.2017.04.006 ↗
61. Nonlinear elastic properties of polyacrylamide gels: implications for quantification of cellular forces