High-plex expression profiling reveals that implants drive spatiotemporal protein production and innate immune activation for tissue repair
Source abstract
Abstract
Surprisingly little clarity exists concerning effects of biomaterial properties on spatially localized protein expression, which drives implant success. Wound healing and tissue regeneration must be optimally supported by the implant, adsorbed proteins, immune cells, and fibroblasts; cells determine repair and functional recovery through protein production and regulation. However, not yet fully understood is how implants differentially drive spatial quantities of individual proteins both within the implant interior and the tissue surrounding it. Here we apply GeoMxⓇ digital spatial profiling to site-specifically investigate protein production in porous implants. Data is collected on the location and quantity of 40+ proteins from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue slides of anisotropic tissue scaffolds (n = 18) with differing pore sizes (35 µm, 53 µm) and implantation durations (2, 14, 28 days); matching bulk gene expression data (700+ genes) is measured for identical implants. Notably, we discover fundamental spatial relationships in protein localization that in both the implant interior and the exterior are either uniquely independent or dependent of implant microstructure: dendritic cell marker CD11c and fibronectin significantly dominate the scaffold interior, while cell-to-cell adhesion marker CD34 and anti-inflammatory M2 polarization marker CD163 localize in the exterior. Lastly, collating spatial and bulk information, unique spatiotemporal expression patterns are identified for markers such as fibronectin, which are only uncoverable through spatial profiling and are otherwise hidden in bulk expression results. Together, these discoveries illustrate the critical importance of quantifying spatial expression patterns for implants, facilitating a paradigm shift in the iterative design, mechanistic understanding, and rapid assessment of biomaterials. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Spatial localization and expression of proteins, which determine implant success, are not fully understood because quantitative high-plex profiling is challenging. Applying GeoMxⓇ digital spatial profiling to site-specifically investigate protein production in porous implants, data is collected on the location and quantity of 40+ protein targets from tissue scaffolds with differing pore sizes (35 µm, 53 µm) and implantation durations (2, 14, 28 days). Collecting in parallel matched bulk gene expression data (700+ genes) for identical implants, we discover significant spatiotemporal expression patterns that remain otherwise hidden in differential bulk results. This new approach for the rapid assessment of biomaterials offers an enhanced mechanistic understanding and enables the tailoring of implants for superior regenerative outcomes.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Combinatorial hydrogel library enables identification of materials that mitigate the foreign body response in primates10.1038/nbt.3462 ↗
2. Zwitterionic hydrogels implanted in mice resist the foreign-body reaction10.1038/nbt.2580 ↗
3. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 ↗
4. The pathology of the foreign body reaction against biomaterials10.1002/jbm.a.35958 ↗
5. Macrophage reaction against biomaterials in the mouse model – phenotypes, functions and markers10.1016/j.actbio.2016.07.003 ↗
6. Quantitative evaluation of the in vivo biocompatibility and performance of freeze-cast tissue scaffolds
7. Size- and shape-dependent foreign body immune response to materials implanted in rodents and non-human primates10.1038/nmat4290 ↗
8. Colony stimulating factor-1 receptor is a central component of the foreign body response to biomaterial implants in rodents and non-human primates10.1038/nmat4866 ↗
9. Local release of dexamethasone from macroporous scaffolds accelerates islet transplant engraftment by promotion of anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.004 ↗
10. Divergent immune responses to synthetic and biological scaffolds10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.11.002 ↗
11. Comparison of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction with nanostringⓇ methodology using adipose and liver tissues from rats fed seaweed10.1016/j.nbt.2016.01.002 ↗
12. Reducing capsular thickness and enhancing angiogenesis around implant drug release systems10.1016/S0168-3659(01)00502-8 ↗
13. Immune responses to implants – a review of the implications for the design of immunomodulatory biomaterials10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.078 ↗
14. Spatially resolved transcriptomics and beyond | Nature Reviews Genetics, (n.d.). https://www.nature.com/articles/nrg3832 (accessed August 27, 2021).
15. High multiplex, digital spatial profiling of proteins and rna in fixed tissue using genomic detection methods
16. Method of the year: spatially resolved transcriptomics10.1038/s41592-020-01033-y ↗
17. Digital multiplexed gene expression analysis using the nanostring nCounter system
18. Multiplexed measurements of gene signatures in different analytes using the nanostring nCounter™ assay system10.1186/1756-0500-2-80 ↗
19. Biomarkers associated with beneficial PD-1 checkpoint blockade in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) identified using high-plex digital spatial profiling10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0175 ↗
20. B cells and tertiary lymphoid structures promote immunotherapy response10.1038/s41586-019-1922-8 ↗
21. Impact of TREM2 risk variants on brain region-specific immune activation and plaque microenvironment in alzheimer's disease patient brain samples10.1007/s00401-019-02048-2 ↗
22. Biological responses to materials10.1146/annurev.matsci.31.1.81 ↗
23. Ratner · 2004
24. Biomaterials by freeze casting, philosophical transactions of the royal society A: mathematical
25. Preparation and characterization of porous crosslinked collagenous matrices containing bioavailable chondroitin sulphate10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00240-3 ↗
26. Bioinspired structural materials10.1038/nmat4089 ↗
27. Anisotropic freeze-cast collagen scaffolds for tissue regeneration: how processing conditions affect structure and properties in the dry and fully hydrated states10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.09.012 ↗
28. Preliminary assessment of a hysteroscopic fallopian tube heat and biomaterial technology for permanent female sterilization
29. Localized immunosuppressive environment in the foreign body response to implanted biomaterials10.2353/ajpath.2009.080962 ↗
30. Timing underpins the benefits associated with injectable collagen biomaterial therapy for the treatment of myocardial infarction10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.11.004 ↗
31. Biomaterial implants mediate autologous stem cell recruitment in mice10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.050 ↗
32. Humanized mouse model for assessing the human immune response to xenogeneic and allogeneic decellularized biomaterials10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.03.016 ↗
33. The role of complement in biomaterial-induced inflammation10.1016/j.molimm.2006.06.020 ↗
34. The relationship between collagen scaffold cross-linking agents and neutrophils in the foreign body reaction10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.049 ↗
35. Understanding the mysterious M2 macrophage through activation markers and effector mechanisms10.1155/2015/816460 ↗
36. Mechanobiological mimicry of helper t lymphocytes to evaluate cell–biomaterials crosstalk
37. Macrophage production of fibronectin, a chemoattractant for fibroblasts10.4049/jimmunol.127.2.673 ↗
38. The cell binding fragment of fibronectin is chemotactic for fibroblasts10.1016/0309-1651(81)90253-8 ↗
39. Macrophage and fibroblast interactions in biomaterial-mediated fibrosis
40. Role of fibronectin in normal wound healing10.1111/iwj.12109 ↗