Intermittent actuation attenuates fibrotic behaviour of myofibroblasts
Source abstract
Abstract
The foreign body response (FBR) to implanted materials culminates in the deposition of a hypo-permeable, collagen rich fibrotic capsule by myofibroblast cells at the implant site. The fibrotic capsule can be deleterious to the function of some medical implants as it can isolate the implant from the host environment. Modulation of fibrotic capsule formation has been achieved using intermittent actuation of drug delivery implants, however the mechanisms underlying this response are not well understood. Here, we use analytical, computational, and in vitro models to understand the response of human myofibroblasts (WPMY-1 stromal cell line) to intermittent actuation using soft robotics and investigate how actuation can alter the secretion of collagen and pro/anti-inflammatory cytokines by these cells. Our findings suggest that there is a mechanical loading threshold that can modulate the fibrotic behaviour of myofibroblasts, by reducing the secretion of soluble collagen, transforming growth factor beta-1 and interleukin 1-beta, and upregulating the anti-inflammatory interleukin-10. By improving our understanding of how cells involved in the FBR respond to mechanical actuation, we can harness this technology to improve functional outcomes for a wide range of implanted medical device applications including drug delivery and cell encapsulation platforms. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: A major barrier to the successful clinical translation of many implantable medical devices is the foreign body response (FBR) and resultant deposition of a hypo-permeable fibrotic capsule (FC) around the implant. Perturbation of the implant site using intermittent actuation (IA) of soft-robotic implants has previously been shown to modulate the FBR and reduce FC thickness. However, the mechanisms of action underlying this response were largely unknown. Here, we investigate how IA can alter the activity of myofibroblast cells, and ultimately suggest that there is a mechanical loading threshold within which their fibrotic behaviour can be modulated. These findings can be harnessed to improve functional outcomes for a wide range of medical implants, particularly drug delivery and cell encapsulation devices.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. Domesticating the foreign body response: recent advances and applications10.1016/j.addr.2019.08.010 ↗
2. Dealing with the foreign-body response to implanted biomaterials: strategies and applications of new materials
3. Modulating the foreign body response of implants for diabetes treatment10.1016/j.addr.2021.01.011 ↗
4. A review of the biocompatibility of implantable devices: current challenges to overcome foreign body response10.1177/193229680800200610 ↗
5. A review of the foreign-body response to subcutaneously-implanted devices: the role of Macrophages and cytokines in biofouling and fibrosis10.1177/193229680800200504 ↗
6. Human subcutaneous tissue response to glucose sensors: macrophages accumulation impact on sensor accuracy10.1089/dia.2017.0321 ↗
7. Initial clinical evaluation of VC-01TM combination product—a stem cell–derived islet replacement for type 1 diabetes (T1D)10.2337/db18-138-OR ↗
8. Design considerations for macroencapsulation devices for stem cell derived islets for the treatment of type 1 diabetes10.1002/advs.202100820 ↗
9. Medical devices, smart drug delivery, wearables and technology for the treatment of Diabetes Mellitus10.1016/j.addr.2022.114280 ↗
10. Cellular and molecular dynamics in the foreign body reaction10.1089/ten.2006.12.1955 ↗
11. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 ↗
12. Macrophage phenotypes in tissue repair and the foreign body response : implications for biomaterial-based regenerative medicine10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.038 ↗
13. The role of myofibroblasts in physiological and pathological tissue repair10.1101/cshperspect.a041231 ↗
14. Unraveling SSc pathophysiology; the myofibroblast10.3389/fimmu.2018.02452 ↗
15. Fibroblasts in fibrosis: novel roles and mediators10.3389/fphar.2014.00123 ↗
16. The myofibroblast at a glance10.1242/jcs.227900 ↗
17. Suppression of the fibrotic encapsulation of silicone implants by inhibiting the mechanical activation of pro-fibrotic TGF-β10.1038/s41551-021-00722-z ↗
18. TGF-β in fibrosis by acting as a conductor for contractile properties of myofibroblasts10.1186/s13578-019-0362-3 ↗
19. Tissue mechanics and fibrosis10.1016/j.bbadis.2013.02.007 ↗
20. Macrophage and fibroblast interactions in biomaterial-mediated fibrosis10.1002/adhm.201801451 ↗
21. Biomimetic immunomodulation strategies for effective tissue repair and restoration10.1016/j.addr.2021.113913 ↗
22. Biomedical and tissue engineering strategies to control foreign body reaction to invasive neural electrodes10.3389/fbioe.2021.659033 ↗
23. A. Carnicer-Lombarte, D.G. Barone, I.B. Dimov, R.S. Hamilton, M. Prater, X. Zhao, A.L. Rutz, G.G. Malliaras, S.P. Lacour, C.E. Bryant, J.W. Fawcett, K. Franze, Foreign body reaction is triggered in vivo by cellular mechanosensing of implants stiffer than host tissue, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1101/829648.10.1101/829648 ↗
24. Tissue response to implanted polymers: the significance of sample shape10.1002/jbm.820100308 ↗
25. Some aspects of macrophage behavior at the implant interface10.1002/jbm.820180407 ↗
26. Foreign body reaction to implantable biosensors: effects of tissue trauma and implant size10.1177/1932296815601869 ↗
27. Biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface - effects of motion, pressure, and design on sensor performance and the foreign body response - Part I: theoretical framework10.1177/193229681100500317 ↗
28. A micron-scale surface topography design reducing cell adhesion to implanted materials10.1038/s41598-018-29167-2 ↗
29. Construction of superhydrophobic pyrolytic carbon by creating a biomimetic cobblestone surface pattern for improved hemocompatibility10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129259 ↗
30. Antibacterial nanostructured surfaces modulate protein adsorption, inflammatory responses, and fibrous capsule formation10.1021/acsami.2c13415 ↗
31. Soft robot–mediated autonomous adaptation to fibrotic capsule formation for improved drug delivery10.1126/scirobotics.abq4821 ↗
32. PLGA microsphere /PVA hydrogel coatings suppress the foreign body reaction for 6 months10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.09.021 ↗
33. Prevention of foreign body reaction in a pre-clinical large animal model10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.01.038 ↗
34. An actuatable soft reservoir modulates host foreign body response10.1126/scirobotics.aax7043 ↗
35. Dynamic actuation enhances transport and extends therapeutic lifespan in an implantable drug delivery platform10.1038/s41467-022-32147-w ↗
36. Strain-dependent modulation of macrophage polarization within scaffolds10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.002 ↗
37. GIBBON: the geometry and image-based bioengineering add-on10.21105/joss.00506 ↗
38. Timoshenko · 1959
39. Large deflection of clamped circular plate and accuracy of its approximate analytical solutions
40. Measuring the density and viscosity of culture media for optimized computational fluid dynamics analysis of in vitro devices10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105024 ↗
41. Stimulation of collagen production by transforming growth factor-β1 during differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts to myofibroblasts10.1161/hy0202.103268 ↗
42. The Myofibroblast10.2353/ajpath.2007.070112 ↗
43. Recent Developments in Myofibroblast Biology10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.02.004 ↗
44. Transforming growth factor-beta 1-induced collagen production in cultures of cardiac fibroblasts is the result of the appearance of myofibroblasts10.1358/mf.2002.24.6.693065 ↗
45. Bidirectional regulation of macrophage function by TGF-β10.1016/S1286-4579(99)00257-9 ↗
46. Cyclic mechanical stretch reduces myofibroblast differentiation of primary lung fibroblasts10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.11.033 ↗
47. Single bout short duration fluid shear stress induces osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 Cells via integrin β1 and BMP2 signaling cross-talk10.1371/journal.pone.0061600 ↗
48. Interstitial flow promotes macrophage polarization toward an M2 phenotype10.1091/mbc.E18-03-0164 ↗
49. Mechanobiological conditioning of mesenchymal stem cells for enhanced vascular regeneration10.1038/s41551-020-00674-w ↗
50. Physiological fluid flow moderates fibroblast responsesto TGF-b110.1002/jcb.25767 ↗
51. Interstitial fluid flow induces myofibroblast differentiation and collagen alignment in vitro10.1242/jcs.02605 ↗
52. Interstitial fluid flow and cyclic strain differentially regulate cardiac fibroblast activation via AT1R and TGF- β 110.1016/j.yexcr.2011.10.008 ↗
53. Skeletal muscle regeneration with robotic actuation-mediated clearance of neutrophils10.1126/scitranslmed.abe8868 ↗
54. Biologic-free mechanically induced muscle regeneration10.1073/pnas.1517517113 ↗
55. Human in vitro model mimicking material-driven vascular regeneration reveals how cyclic stretch and shear stress differentially modulate inflammation and matrix deposition10.1002/adbi.201900249 ↗
56. Mechanical strain regulates myofibroblast differentiation of human scleral fibroblasts by YAP10.3389/fphys.2021.712509 ↗
57. Anti-inflammatory therapy enables robot-actuated regeneration of aged muscle10.1126/scirobotics.add9369 ↗
58. Feedback amplification of fibrosis through matrix stiffening and COX-2 suppression10.1083/jcb.201004082 ↗
59. Alveolar epithelial cells and microenvironmental stiffness synergistically drive fibroblast activation in three-dimensional hydrogel lung models10.1039/D2BM00827K ↗
60. Biomechanical force and cellular stiffness in lung fibrosis10.1016/j.ajpath.2022.02.001 ↗
61. Extracellular matrix in lung development, homeostasis and disease10.1016/j.matbio.2018.03.005 ↗
62. Increased stiffness of the rat liver precedes matrix deposition: implications for fibrosis10.1152/ajpgi.00032.2007 ↗
63. Dynamic and static biomechanical traits of cardiac fibrosis
64. Myocardial stiffness is determined by ventricular fibrosis, but not by compensatory or excessive hypertrophy in hypertensive heart10.1016/S0008-6363(02)00341-3 ↗
65. S.M. Swain, J.M.-J. Romac, S.R. Vigna, R.A. Liddle, Piezo1-mediated stellate cell activation causes pressure-induced pancreatic fibrosis in mice, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.158288.10.1172/jci.insight.158288 ↗
66. Mechanical control of cardiac myofibroblasts10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.11.025 ↗