journal article·2023-01

Design and evaluation of 3D-printed Sr-HT-Gahnite bioceramic for FDA regulatory submission: A Good Laboratory Practice sheep study

Ellen T. Newsom, Ameneh Sadeghpour, Ali Entezari, Joan Lace U. Vinzons, Ralph E. Stanford, Mohammad Mirkhalaf, Daniel Chon, Colin R. Dunstan, Hala Zreiqat

Acta Biomaterialia· Volume 156
Publisher page

Abstract

There is an unmet clinical need for a spinal fusion implant material that recapitulates the biological and mechanical performance of natural bone. We have developed a bioceramic, Sr-HT-Gahnite, which has been identified as a potential fusion device material. This material has the capacity to transform the future of the global interbody devices market, with follow on social, economic, and environmental benefits, rooted in its remarkable combination of mechanical properties and bioactivity. In this study, and in line with FDA requirements, the in vivo preclinical systemic biological safety of a Sr-HT-Gahnite interbody fusion device is assessed over 26 weeks in sheep under good laboratory practice (GLP). Following the in-life phase, animals are assessed for systemic biological effects via blood haematology and clinical biochemistry, strontium dosage analysis in the blood and wool, and histopathology examination of the distant organs including adrenals, brain, heart, kidneys, liver, lungs and bronchi, skeletal muscle, spinal nerves close to the implanted sites, ovaries, and draining lymph nodes. Our results show that no major changes in blood haematology or biochemistry parameters are observed, no systemic distribution of strontium to the blood and wool, and no macroscopic or histopathological abnormalities in the distant organs when Sr-HT-Gahnite was implanted, compared to baseline and control values. Together, these results indicate the systemic safety of the Sr-HT-Gahnite interbody fusion device. The results of this study extend to the systemic safety of other Sr-HT-Gahnite implanted medical devices in contact with bone or tissue, of similar size and manufactured using the described processes. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This paper is considered original and innovative as it is the first that thoroughly reports the systemic biological safety of previously undescribed bioceramic material, Sr-HT-Gahnite. The study has been performed under good laboratory practice, in line with FDA requirements for assessment of a new interbody fusion device, making the results broadly applicable to the translation of sheep models to the human cervical spine; and also the translation of Sr-HT-Gahnite as a biomaterial for use in additional applications. We expect this study to be of broad interest to the readership of Acta Biomaterilia. Its findings are directly applicable to researchers and clinicians working in bone repair and the development of synthetic biomaterials.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Bone grafts, bone substitutes and orthobiologics: the bridge between basic science and clinical advancements in fracture healing10.4161/org.23306 ↗
2. 2021
3. Surgery Type (Anterior, Transforaminal, Posterior, and Lateral), and End User (Hospital, Clinic, Ambulatory Surgical Center, and Others) - Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast
4. Bioactive behavior of silicon substituted calcium phosphate based bioceramics for bone regeneration10.1016/j.msec.2013.11.013 ↗
5. Mechanical performance of cervical intervertebral body fusion devices: a systematic analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.01.032 ↗
6. Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.011 ↗
7. Current strategies to improve the bioactivity of PEEK10.3390/ijms15045426 ↗
8. Extrusion of expandable stacked interbody device for lumbar fusion: case report of a complication10.1097/BRS.0b013e318257f14d ↗
9. Subsidence of polyetheretherketone intervertebral cages in minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182458b2f ↗
10. Decreased bacteria activity on Si3N4 surfaces compared with PEEK or titanium
11. Severe infectious complications after PEEK-derived implant placement: report of three cases10.1016/j.ajoms.2013.04.006 ↗
12. Can PEEK dethrone titanium as the choice implant material for metastatic spine tumor surgery?10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.059 ↗
13. Analysis of harvest morbidity and radiographic outcome using autograft for anterior cervical fusion10.1097/00007632-199710010-00005 ↗
14. Unique microstructural design of ceramic scaffolds for bone regeneration under load10.1016/j.actbio.2013.02.039 ↗
15. A novel bone substitute with high bioactivity, strength, and porosity for repairing large and load-bearing bone defects
16. Design and fabrication of 3D printed scaffolds with a mechanical strength comparable to cortical bone to repair large bone defects10.1038/srep19468 ↗
17. Current approaches to bone tissue engineering: the interface between biology and engineering10.1002/adhm.201701061 ↗
18. Fabrication and characterization of a new, strong and bioactive ceramic scaffold for bone regeneration10.1016/j.matlet.2013.06.046 ↗
19. Fracture behaviors of ceramic tissue scaffolds for load bearing applications10.1038/srep28816 ↗
20. Effects of Sr-HT-Gahnite on osteogenesis and angiogenesis by adipose derived stem cells for critical-sized calvarial defect repair
21. Food Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health · 2007
22. Influence of cage design on interbody fusion in a sheep cervical spine model
23. Bioabsorbable interbody cages in a sheep cervical spine fusion model10.1097/01.brs.0000137060.79732.78 ↗
24. PEEK versus Ti interbody fusion devices resultant fusion, bone apposition, initial and 26-week biomechanics10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826851a4 ↗
25. High rate of fusion in sheep cervical spines following anterior interbody surgery with absorbable and nonabsorbable implant devices,”10.1097/01.brs.0000245935.69927.a1 ↗
26. Nationwide registry-based analysis of cardiovascular risk factors and adverse outcomes in patients treated with strontium ranelate10.1007/s00198-013-2469-4 ↗
27. Cardiac concerns associated with strontium ranelate10.1517/14740338.2014.939169 ↗
28. Comparative cardiovascular safety of strontium ranelate and bisphosphonates: a multi-database study in 5 EU countries by the EU-ADR Alliance10.1007/s00198-020-05580-0 ↗