Effect of tribological factors on wet adhesion of a microstructured surface to peritoneal tissue
Source abstract
Abstract
Bio-inspired microstructured surfaces have been developed that attach effectively to a wet surface. However, little is known about the associated tribological and adhesion properties involved. In this paper, the adhesion of a microstructured surface to peritoneal tissue is investigated as a function of preload, speeds of approach and angle of tilt to the horizontal. Results show that within a critical range of preload and speed of approach of the microstructured surface to the tissue result in good adhesion characteristics at the micro-structured surface/tissue interface. The microstructured surface adhesion to the tissue and the payload supported against gravity depend significantly on the tilt angle to the horizontal. Furthermore, a wet adhesion model was used to elucidate the adhesion mechanism of the microstructured surface to a wetted glass. These tests provide significant initial data for the design of a miniature mobile intra-abdominal device which drives the need for this adhesion study.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Tribology and Lubrication Engineering · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Wet adhesion for a miniature mobile intra-abdominal device based on biomimetic principles10.1243/09544062JMES2096 ↗
2. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the state of the art A report on 700 consecutive cases10.1007/BF02067064 ↗
3. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2 ↗
4. Robotic applications in abdominal surgery: their limitations and future developments10.1002/rcs.115 ↗
5. Small occupancy robotic mechanisms for endoscopic surgery
6. Ikuta K, Daifu S, Hasegawa T, Higashikawa H. Hyper-finger for remote minimally invasive surgery in deep area. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI 2002: 5th international conference, Tokyo, Japan; 2002. p. 173–81.10.1007/3-540-45786-0_22 ↗
7. Minimally invasive epicardial injections using a novel semi-autonomous robotic device10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.756049 ↗
8. Mobile in vivo camera robots provide sole visual feedback for abdominal exploration and cholecystectomy10.1007/s00464-005-0205-7 ↗
9. Gray H. Anatomy of the human body. 20th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger; 1918 [chapter 9].10.5962/bhl.title.20311 ↗
10. The peritoneum and the pneumoperitoneum: a review to improve clinical outcome10.1007/s10397-004-0019-y ↗
11. Laparoscopy and tribology: the effect of laparoscopic gas on peritoneal fluid10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60560-9 ↗
12. Turnage RH, Li BDL, McDonald JC. Abdomen. In: Beauchamp R, editors. Townsend: Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. 17th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2004.
13. Wet but not slippery: boundary friction in tree frog adhesive toe pads10.1098/rsif.2006.0135 ↗
14. Saville P. Bio-Inspired Adhesion, Defence R&D Canada – Atlantic DEFENCE DÉFENSE. Technical Memorandum Defence Research and Development Canada Atlantic TM 2009-155, June 2009.
15. Microfabricated adhesive mimicking gecko foot hair10.1038/nmat917 ↗
16. Providing adhesion for a miniature mobile intra-abdominal device based on biomimetic principles
17. Scherge · 2001
18. Hydrophobicity of peritoneal tissues in the rat10.1006/jcis.2002.8569 ↗
19. Mass production of bio-inspired structured surfaces10.1243/09544062JMES540 ↗
20. A miniature ceiling walking robot with flat tacky elastomeric footpads
21. Insects did it first: a micropatterned adhesive tape for robotic applications10.1088/1748-3182/2/4/S01 ↗
22. A beetle-inspired solution for underwater adhesion10.1098/rsif.2007.1171 ↗
23. A bioinspired wet/dry microfluidic adhesive for aqueous environments10.1021/la9021849 ↗
24. A biodegradable and biocompatible gecko-inspired tissue adhesive10.1073/pnas.0712117105 ↗
25. Barnes WJP, Oines C, Smith JM. Whole animal measurements of shear and adhesive forces in adult tree frogs: insights into underlying mechanisms of adhesion obtained from studying the effects of size and scale. J Comput Physiol – A 2006;192:1179–91.10.1007/s00359-006-0146-1 ↗
26. Smith JM, Barnes WJP, Downie JR, Ruxton GD. Structural correlates of increased adhesive efficiency with adult size in the toe pads of hybrid tree frogs. J Comput Physiol – A 2006;192:1193–204.10.1007/s00359-006-0151-4 ↗
27. Dreschsler P, Federle W. Biomechanics of smooth adhesive pads in insects: influence of tarsal secretion on attachment performance. J Comput Physiol – A 2006;192:1213–22.10.1007/s00359-006-0150-5 ↗
28. Wet adhesion with application to tree frog adhesive toe pads and tires10.1088/0953-8984/19/37/376110 ↗
29. Friction enhancement via micropatterned wet elastomer adhesives on small intestinal surfaces10.1088/1748-6041/1/4/007 ↗
30. Friction and nanowear of hard coatings in reciprocating sliding at milli-Newton loads10.1016/j.wear.2005.02.078 ↗
31. Technical Manual for the E725 Microprocessor Based Transducer Indicator/Controller CD Input Version. Wolverhampton: RDP Electronics Ltd. The Low Voltage Safety Directive 2006/95/E; 2006. p. 1–20.
32. Wet self-cleaning of biologically inspired elastomer mushroom shaped microfibrillar adhesives10.1021/la900732h ↗
33. Adhesion of biologically inspired polymer microfibers on soft surfaces10.1021/la900997p ↗
34. A new endoscopic microcapsule robot using beetle inspired microfibrillar adhesives
35. Smooth vertical surface climbing with directional adhesion10.1109/TRO.2007.909786 ↗
36. Waalbot: an agile small-scale wall climbing obot utilizing pressure sensitive adhesives10.1109/TMECH.2007.897277 ↗
37. Karagozler ME, Cheung E, Kwon J, Sitti M. Miniature endoscopic capsule robot using biomimetic micro-patterned adhesives. In: Proceedings on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics. First IEEE/RAS-EMBS international conference, Pisa, Italy, 2006. p. 105–11.10.1109/BIOROB.2006.1639068 ↗
38. The effect of preload on the pull-off force in indentation tests of microfiber arrays10.1098/rspa.2008.0362 ↗
39. Effect of rate on adhesion and static friction of a film-terminated fibrillar interface10.1021/la8033885 ↗
40. Walker G, Yue AB, Ratcliffe J. The adhesive organ of the blowfly, Calliphora vomitoria: a functional approach (Diptera:Calliphoridae). J Zool London – A 1985;205:297–307.10.1111/j.1469-7998.1985.tb03536.x ↗
41. Ultrastructure and physical properties of an adhesive surface, the toe pad epithelium of the tree frog, Litoria caerulea White10.1242/jeb.019232 ↗
42. Tacky adhesion – a preliminary study10.1016/0095-8522(53)90014-2 ↗
43. Cai S, Bhushan B. Meniscus and viscous forces during separation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic smooth/rough surfaces with symmetric and asymmetric contact angles. Philos Trans R Soc – A 2008;366:1627–47.10.1098/rsta.2007.2176 ↗
44. The strength of liquid bridges between dissimilar materials10.1080/00218467308075014 ↗
45. Capillary bonding of wet surfaces – the effects of contact angle and surface roughness10.1163/156856197X00750 ↗