journal article·2022-03

Microsphere sensors for characterizing stress fields within three-dimensional extracellular matrix

Xin Ding, Moxiao Li, Bo Cheng, Zhao Wei, Yuqing Dong, Feng Xu

Acta Biomaterialia· Volume 141
Publisher page

Abstract

Stress in the three-dimensional extracellular matrix is one of the key cues in regulating multiscale biological processes. Thus far, noticeable progress in methods and techniques (e.g., micropipette aspiration, AFM, and molecule probes) has been made to quantify stress in cell microenvironment at different length scales. Among them, the microsphere sensor-based method (MSS-based method) has emerged as an advantageous approach over conventional techniques in quantifying stress in situ and in vivo at cellular and supra-cellular scales. This method is implemented by seven sequential steps, including fabrication, modification, characterization, cell adhesion, imaging, displacement field extraction and stress calculation. Precise control of each step and inter-tunning between steps can provide quantitative characterization of stress field. However, detailed procedural information associated with each step and process has been scattered. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of MSS-based method, systematically summarizing the principles and research progresses. Firstly, the basic principles are introduced, and the specific experiment and calculation processes of MSS-based method are presented in detail. Then, recent advances and applications of this method are summarized. Finally, perspectives of the limitations and development trends of MSS-based method are discussed. This specific and comprehensive review would provide a guideline for the widespread application of MSS-based method as an advantageous method for in situ and in vivo stress characterization at cellular and supra-cellular scale within three-dimensional extracellular matrix. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: In this review, a method based on a microsphere sensor (MSS-based method) as an advantageous approach over conventional techniques in quantifying stress in situ and in vivo at cellular and supra-cellular scales is introduced and discussed. This technique is implemented by seven sequential steps, including fabrication, modification, characterization, cell junction, imaging, displacement field extraction, and stress calculation. Precise control of each step and inter-tunning between steps can provide quantitative stress field. However, detailed procedural information associated with each step has been scattered. Thus, a comprehensive review collating recent advances and perspective discussions is a necessity to introduce a better option for quantifying the stress field in biological processes at the cellular and supra-cellular scales.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Silk-based biomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Directional control of lamellipodia extension by constraining cell shape and orienting cell tractional forces10.1096/fj.02-0038com ↗
2. Geometric control of cell life and death10.1126/science.276.5317.1425 ↗
3. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 ↗
4. Physical forces during collective cell migration10.1038/nphys1269 ↗
5. Mechanics of epithelial tissue homeostasis and morphogenesis10.1126/science.1235249 ↗
6. Forces in tissue morphogenesis and patterning10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.008 ↗
7. A fluid-to-solid jamming transition underlies vertebrate body axis elongation10.1038/s41586-018-0479-2 ↗
8. Mechanical control of tissue shape and morphogenetic flows during vertebrate body axis elongation10.1038/s41598-021-87672-3 ↗
9. Collective cell durotaxis emerges from long-range intercellular force transmission10.1126/science.aaf7119 ↗
10. Cell shape and durotaxis explained from cell-extracellular matrix forces and focal adhesion dynamics10.1016/j.isci.2020.101488 ↗
11. Cell motility, contact guidance, and durotaxis10.1039/C8SM02564A ↗
12. Solid stress and elastic energy as measures of tumour mechanopathology10.1038/s41551-016-0004 ↗
13. Quantifying solid stress and elastic energy from excised or in situ tumors10.1038/nprot.2018.020 ↗
14. Force generation, transmission, and integration during cell and tissue morphogenesis10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104027 ↗
15. Gardel · 2015 · 1
16. Mapping local matrix remodeling induced by a migrating tumor cell using three-dimensional multiple-particle tracking10.1529/biophysj.108.132738 ↗
17. Live cells exert 3-dimensional traction forces on their substrata10.1007/s12195-009-0082-6 ↗
18. Three-dimensional balance of cortical tension and axial contractility enables fast amoeboid migration10.1016/j.bpj.2014.11.3478 ↗
19. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension10.1126/science.1064829 ↗
20. Deconstructing the third dimension–how 3D culture microenvironments alter cellular cues
21. Measuring mechanical stress in living tissues10.1038/s42254-020-0184-6 ↗
22. Quantifying forces in cell biology10.1038/ncb3564 ↗
23. Visualizing the invisible: advanced optical microscopy as a tool to measure biomechanical forces10.3389/fcell.2021.706126 ↗
24. Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics10.1038/nature09198 ↗
25. Genetically encoded force sensors for measuring mechanical forces in proteins10.4161/cib.15505 ↗
26. Mechanosensitive fluorescent probes to image membrane tension in mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, and lysosomes10.1021/jacs.8b13189 ↗
27. Defining single molecular forces required to activate integrin and notch signaling10.1126/science.1231041 ↗
28. A DNA-based molecular probe for optically reporting cellular traction forces10.1038/nmeth.3145 ↗
29. The piconewton force awakens: quantifying mechanics in cells10.1016/j.tcb.2016.07.005 ↗
30. Mechanosensitive shivering of model tissues under controlled aspiration10.1073/pnas.1105741108 ↗
31. Pulsatile cell-autonomous contractility drives compaction in the mouse embryo10.1038/ncb3185 ↗
32. Atomic force microscopy-based mechanobiology10.1038/s42254-018-0001-7 ↗
33. Atomic force microscopy-based characterization and design of biointerfaces10.1038/natrevmats.2017.8 ↗
34. Biological applications of optical forces10.1146/annurev.bb.23.060194.001335 ↗
35. Direct laser manipulation reveals the mechanics of cell contacts in vivo10.1073/pnas.1418732112 ↗
36. Magnetic tweezers in cell biology10.1016/S0091-679X(07)83020-2 ↗
37. On the growth and form of the gut10.1038/nature10277 ↗
38. Video force microscopy reveals the mechanics of ventral furrow invagination in Drosophila10.1073/pnas.1006591107 ↗
39. Measuring the mechanical stress induced by an expanding multicellular tumor system: a case study10.1016/S0014-4827(03)00256-8 ↗
40. Measurement of mechanical tractions exerted by cells in three-dimensional matrices10.1038/nmeth.1531 ↗
41. Three-dimensional force microscopy of cells in biopolymer networks10.1038/nmeth.3685 ↗
42. Quantifying cell-generated mechanical forces within living embryonic tissues10.1038/nmeth.2761 ↗
43. Cell-like pressure sensors reveal increase of mechanical stress towards the core of multicellular spheroids under compression10.1038/ncomms14056 ↗
44. Quantifying compressive forces between living cell layers and within tissues using elastic round microgels10.1038/s41467-018-04245-1 ↗
45. Polyacrylamide bead sensors for in vivo quantification of cell-scale stress in zebrafish development10.1038/s41598-019-53425-6 ↗
46. Microparticle traction force microscopy reveals subcellular force exertion patterns in immune cell–target interactions10.1038/s41467-019-13804-z ↗
47. Rapid analysis of cell-generated forces within a multicellular aggregate using microsphere-based traction force microscopy10.1039/C9SM02377A ↗
48. Dispersible hydrogel force sensors reveal patterns of solid mechanical stress in multicellular spheroid cultures
49. 3D microenvironment stiffness regulates tumor spheroid growth and mechanics via p21 and ROCK
50. A mechanical perspective on phagocytic cup formation10.1016/j.ceb.2020.05.011 ↗
51. The stiffness of living tissues and its implications for tissue engineering10.1038/s41578-019-0169-1 ↗
52. Taxane-induced apoptosis decompresses blood vessels and lowers interstitial fluid pressure in solid tumors: clinical implications
53. Mechanical force-triggered drug delivery10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00369 ↗
54. Review on cell mechanics: experimental and modeling approaches10.1115/1.4025355 ↗
55. Measuring cell-generated forces: a guide to the available tools10.1038/nmeth.3834 ↗
56. Mechanical force-driven adherens junction remodeling and epithelial dynamics10.1016/j.devcel.2018.09.014 ↗
57. Microscale interrogation of 3D tissue mechanics10.3389/fbioe.2019.00412 ↗
58. A toolbox to explore the mechanics of living embryonic tissues10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.03.011 ↗
59. Measuring forces and stresses in situ in living tissues10.1242/dev.119776 ↗
60. Nanomaterials for in vivo imaging of mechanical forces and electrical fields10.1038/natrevmats.2017.80 ↗
61. Elucidating the biomechanics of leukocyte transendothelial migration by quantitative imaging10.3389/fcell.2021.635263 ↗
62. Spatiotemporal variation of endogenous cell-generated stresses within 3D multicellular spheroids10.1038/s41598-017-12363-x ↗
63. Standardized microgel beads as elastic cell mechanical probes10.1039/C8TB01421C ↗
64. Mechanoresponsive hydrogel particles as a platform for three-dimensional force sensing10.1021/acsami.9b04312 ↗
65. Quantifying the compressive force of 3D cardiac tissues via calculating the volumetric deformation of built-in elastic gelatin microspheres10.1002/adhm.202001716 ↗
66. Hydrogel microparticles for biomedical applications10.1038/s41578-019-0148-6 ↗
67. Holding it together-when cadherin meets cadherin10.1016/j.bpj.2021.03.025 ↗
68. Feeling the force: multiscale force sensing and transduction at the cell-cell interface10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.06.006 ↗
69. Fibronectin-based nanomechanical biosensors to map 3D surface strains in live cells and tissue10.1038/s41467-020-19659-z ↗
70. Nature of specific ligand-receptor bonds, in particular the antigen-antibody bond10.1080/01971520009349531 ↗
71. Relationship between receptor/ligand binding affinity and adhesion strength10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81277-3 ↗
72. Force sensors for measuring microenvironmental forces during mesenchymal condensation10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120684 ↗
73. Cell surface engineering to enhance mesenchymal stem cell migration toward an SDF-1 gradient10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.070 ↗
74. Mechanoresponsive hydrogel particles as a platform for three-dimensional force sensing10.1021/acsami.9b04312 ↗
75. Belyadi · 2019
76. A comparison of methods to assess cell mechanical properties10.1038/s41592-018-0015-1 ↗
77. Cytoskeletal prestress: the cellular hallmark in mechanobiology and mechanomedicine10.1002/cm.21658 ↗
78. Global and local tension measurements in biomimetic skeletal muscle tissues reveals early mechanical homeostasis10.7554/eLife.60145 ↗
79. Microtissue geometry and cell-generated forces drive patterning of liver progenitor cell differentiation in 3D10.1002/adhm.202100223 ↗
80. D. Vorselen, S.R. Barger, Y. Wang, W. Cai, J.A. Theriot, N.C. Gauthier, M. Krendel, Phagocytic'teeth'and myosin-II'jaw'power target constriction during phagocytosis, bioRxiv (2021).10.7554/eLife.68627.sa2 ↗
81. Mechanical compression drives cancer cells toward invasive phenotype10.1073/pnas.1118910109 ↗
82. Cellular traction stresses increase with increasing metastatic potential10.1371/journal.pone.0032572 ↗
83. Interfacial geometry dictates cancer cell tumorigenicity10.1038/nmat4610 ↗
84. Labouesse · 2011
85. Fc-receptor-mediated phagocytosis is regulated by mechanical properties of the target10.1242/jcs.115.4.849 ↗
86. Cytotoxic T cells use mechanical force to potentiate target cell killing10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.021 ↗
87. In vivo quantification of spatially varying mechanical properties in developing tissues10.1038/nmeth.4101 ↗
88. Mapping cellular-scale internal mechanics in 3D tissues with thermally responsive hydrogel probes10.1038/s41467-020-18469-7 ↗
89. Optical sensing of mechanical pressure based on diffusion measurement in polyacrylamide cell-like barometers10.1039/C6SM02887J ↗
90. Near-infrared light-responsive nanomaterials in cancer therapeutics10.1039/C4CS00011K ↗
91. Non-invasive tracking of hydrogel degradation using upconversion nanoparticles10.1016/j.actbio.2017.04.016 ↗
92. Fabrication of fluorescent composite hydrogel using in situ synthesis of upconversion nanoparticles10.1088/1361-6528/aa6564 ↗
93. Intravital microscopy of collective invasion plasticity in breast cancer10.1242/dmm.034330 ↗
94. Active biomaterials for mechanobiology10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120497 ↗
95. Poroelasticity of a covalently crosslinked alginate hydrogel under compression10.1063/1.3517146 ↗
96. Review on cell mechanics: experimental and modeling approaches10.1115/1.4025355 ↗
97. Distribution and propagation of mechanical stress in simulated structurally heterogeneous tissue spheroids10.1039/D0SM02033H ↗
98. Modified closed-form solutions for three-dimensional elastic deformations of a composite structure containing macro-scale spherical gas/liquid inclusions10.1016/j.apm.2021.03.046 ↗
99. B. Gross, E. Shelton, C. Gomez, O. Campàs, STRESS, an automated geometrical characterization of deformable particles for in vivo measurements of cell and tissue mechanical stresses, bioRxiv (2021).10.1101/2021.03.26.437148 ↗
100. DNA-based microparticle tension sensors (µTS) for measuring cell mechanics in non-planar geometries and for high-throughput quantification10.1002/anie.202102206 ↗