journal article·2020-06Open access

Development and calibration of biochemical models for testing dental restorations

Anqi Zhang, Ruoqiong Chen, Wondwosen Aregawi, Yiting He, Shuting Wang, Conrado Aparicio, Joel Rudney, Hooi Pin Chew, Alex S. Fok

Acta Biomaterialia· Volume 109

Abstract

Currently, resin composites are the most popular materials for dental restoration in clinical practice. Although the properties of such materials have been improved significantly, together with better clinical techniques used for their placement, early restoration failure still occurs too frequently. As clinical studies take years to complete, and new resin composites are being produced at ever increasing pace, laboratory assessment using accelerated but representative tests is necessary. The main types of failure in resin-composite restoration are tooth/restoration fracture and secondary caries, which are caused by a combination of mechanical and biochemical challenges. In this study, a biofilm model (S. mutans) and a chemical model (lactic-acid buffer) for producing artificial caries in bovine dentin are developed and calibrated against in situ data. Using a power law relationship between the demineralization depth and challenge duration, scale factors that convert the in vitro durations to the equivalent clinical durations are determined for different pH values for each model. The scale factors will allow the synchronization of biochemical and mechanical challenges in terms of their rates of action to potentially test resin-composite restoration in an accelerated but clinically representative manner. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Although the properties of resin composites for dental restoration have been improved significantly, early restoration failure still occurs too frequently. As clinical studies take years to complete, accelerated laboratory testing is necessary. Resin-composite restoration fail mainly through fracture and secondary caries, caused by a combination of mechanical and biochemical challenges. In this study, a biofilm and a chemical model for producing artificial caries in bovine dentin are calibrated against in situ data. Using a power law relationship between demineralization depth and challenge duration, scale factors are determined for different pH for each model. The scale factors will allow the synchronization of biochemical and mechanical challenges in testing resin-composite restoration in an accelerated but clinically representative manner.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00019-5 ↗
2. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00084-8 ↗
3. Amalgam and resin composite longevity of posterior restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.jdent.2015.06.005 ↗
4. Amalgam vs composite restoration, survival, and secondary caries10.1016/j.jebdp.2016.05.001 ↗
5. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth
6. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.036 ↗
7. A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0169 ↗
8. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: a 5-year randomized controlled clinical study10.1016/j.jdent.2016.05.008 ↗
9. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in adults - A systematic review10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.001 ↗
10. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.001 ↗
11. Biodegradation of resin composites and adhesives by oral bacteria and saliva: a rationale for new material designs that consider the clinical environment and treatment challenges10.1016/j.dental.2013.08.201 ↗
12. An in vitro quantitative antibacterial analysis of amalgam and composite resins10.1016/j.jdent.2006.07.009 ↗
13. Restoration materials and secondary caries using an in vitro biofilm model10.1177/0022034514553245 ↗
14. 12-Year Survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations10.1177/0022034510376071 ↗
15. Risk factors for dental restoration survival: a practice-based study10.1177/0022034519827566 ↗
16. The wear of dental amalgam in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation10.1016/S0109-5641(85)80050-6 ↗
17. Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force and movement control10.1177/00220345830620010801 ↗
18. The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation10.1016/S0109-5641(86)80034-3 ↗
19. Wear of a dental composite in an artificial oral environment: a clinical correlation10.1002/jbm.b.32801 ↗
20. Cyclic mechanical loading promotes bacterial penetration along composite restoration marginal gaps10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.011 ↗
21. Interfacial degradation of adhesive composite restorations mediated by oral biofilms and mechanical challenge in an extracted tooth model of secondary caries10.1016/j.jdent.2017.08.009 ↗
22. A reproducible oral microcosm biofilm model for testing dental materials10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05439.x ↗
23. Caries progression and inhibition in human and bovine root dentine in situ10.1159/000072165 ↗
24. Calibration of a lactic-acid model for simulating biofilm-induced degradation of the dentin-composite interface10.1016/j.dental.2017.08.186 ↗
25. Role of sucrose in the fitness of streptococcus mutans10.1111/j.1399-302X.2007.00413.x ↗
26. Is bovine dentine an appropriate substitute for human dentine in erosion/abrasion tests?10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01843.x ↗
27. Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test10.1177/00220345830620101501 ↗
28. Topographical, diametral, and quantitative analysis of dentin tubules in the root canals of human and bovine teeth10.1016/j.joen.2006.12.011 ↗
29. Comparison of chemical composition of enamel and dentine in human, bovine, porcine and ovine teeth10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.01.014 ↗
30. Morphological analysis of human and bovine dentine by scanning electron microscope investigation10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.09.005 ↗
31. Bovine tooth is a substitute for human tooth on bond strength studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.019 ↗
32. Biodegradation of resin-dentin interfaces increases bacterial microleakage10.1177/0022034510372885 ↗
33. Degradation in the dentin – composite interface subjected to multi-species biofilm challenges10.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.034 ↗
34. Effects of different artificial ageing methods on the degradation of adhesive-dentine interfaces10.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.010 ↗
35. The influence of the organic matrix on demineralization of bovine root dentin in vitro10.1177/00220345940730090701 ↗
36. Genome sequence of streptococcus mutans UA159, a cariogenic dental pathogen10.1073/pnas.172501299 ↗
37. Collagenolytic proteases from bacteria10.1007/s00253-003-1442-0 ↗
38. Identification and characterisation of two extracellular proteases of streptococcus mutans10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb07104.x ↗
39. Identification and analysis of a collagenolytic activity in streptococcus mutans10.1007/s002849900143 ↗
40. Gene expression of bacterial collagenolytic proteases in root caries10.1080/20002297.2018.1424475 ↗
41. In vivo model for microbial invasion of tooth root dentinal tubules10.1590/1678-775720150448 ↗
42. Approximal secondary caries lesion progression, a 20-week in situ study10.1159/000104799 ↗
43. The oral microbiome in dental caries10.33073/pjm-2014-018 ↗