journal article·2009-07

Simulation study of circuit performances of independent double-gate (IDG) MOSFETs with high-permittivity gate dielectrics

X. Loussier, D. Munteanu, J.L. Autran

Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids· Volume 355· Issue 18-21
Publisher page

Abstract

This study analyzes by 2-D numerical simulation the electrical performances of independent double-gate (IDG) MOSFET with high-permittivity (high-kappa) dielectric gate stacks. We particularly address the operation of elementary devices as well as of the associated CMOS inverters, which are investigated in terms of static power dissipation and delay. We show that the introduction of a pure high-kappa gate dielectric layer degrades the device immunity to short-channel effects and the power consumption of the CMOS inverter, but simultaneously improves the inverter speed, with respect to performances of a reference transistor with a SiO2 gate oxide with the same equivalent oxide thickness. However, in real devices, the existence of a native oxide between the high-kappa gate dielectric and the underlying semiconductor reduces parasitic electrostatic effects and sensibly improves inverter speed and power consumption. A detailed comparison between the operation of high-kappa gate stack-based double-gate devices with independent and connected gates is also presented. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Hisamoto · Short Course IEDM Tech. Dig. · 2003
2. Frank · IEDM Tech. Dig. · 1992 · 553
3. Munteanu · Solid-State Electron. · 2006 · 50 · 68010.1016/j.sse.2006.03.038 ↗
4. Harrison · IEDM Tech. Dig. · 2004 · 291
5. Mathew · IEEE Int. SOI Conf. · 2004 · 187
6. Pei · IEEE Trans. Electr. Dev. · 2004 · 51 · 208610.1109/TED.2004.838338 ↗
7. Masahara · IEEE Trans. Electr. Dev. · 2005 · 52 · 204610.1109/TED.2005.855063 ↗
8. Zhang · IEEE Trans. Electr. Dev. · 2005 · 52 · 219810.1109/TED.2005.856184 ↗
9. Pei · IEEE Trans. Electr. Dev. · 2003 · 50 · 213510.1109/TED.2003.817481 ↗
10. Autran · J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. · 2008 · 5 · 112010.1166/jctn.2008.2546 ↗
11. Moreau · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 47 · 701310.1143/JJAP.47.7013 ↗
12. 2004
13. Houssa · MRS Symp. Proc. · 2004 · 177
14. Cheng · IEEE Trans. Electr. Dev. · 2003 · 46 · 153710.1109/16.772508 ↗
15. Ohata · Solid-State Electron. · 2003 · 48 · 34510.1016/S0038-1101(03)00294-6 ↗
16. Yeap · Electron. Lett. · 2003 · 34 · 115010.1049/el:19980800 ↗
17. Autran · J. Non-Cryst. Sol. · 2005 · 351 · 189710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.04.034 ↗
18. International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, 2008, .
19. Silvaco International, Atlas User’s Manual, 2004.
20. Autran · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 44 · 836210.1143/JJAP.44.8362 ↗
21. Munteanu · J. Non-Cryst. Sol. · 2005 · 351 · 191110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.04.037 ↗
22. Loussier · J. Non-Cryst. Sol. · 2007 · 353 · 63910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.11.016 ↗
23. Loussier · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 47 · 339010.1143/JJAP.47.3390 ↗