Determination of the quasistatic linear and non-linear dielectric response in relaxor materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Temperature dependence of the first e 1 and third harmonic dielectric response e 3 in relaxor systems was studied both as a function of the dc electric field by utilising the charge accumulation technique and as a function of the ac electric field. Additional non-linear contribution was found in the ac field dependence of e 1 in lead magnesium niobate single crystals and in lanthanum-modified lead zirconate titanate ceramics. This dominating contribution in the field dependence of e 1 ( ω ) has an origin in the fact that the increasing field shifts the relaxor state from the glassy to a particular crossover state in the glassy-to-ferroelectric crossover region. This was confirmed by quasistatic measurements of the total third-order non-linear dielectric response e 3 t as a function of the dc electric field throughout the glassy-to-ferroelectric crossover region. It is shown that the total third-order non-linear dielectric response can be understood within the extended spherical random bond-random field model of relaxor ferroelectrics.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Multiferroics and related materials · Glass properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Kutnjak · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 29410.1103/PhysRevB.59.294 ↗
2. Bobnar · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 60 · 642010.1103/PhysRevB.60.6420 ↗
3. Bobnar · Europhys. Lett. · 1999 · 48 · 32610.1209/epl/i1999-00549-4 ↗
4. Colla · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1995 · 74 · 168110.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1681 ↗
5. Sommer · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 48 · 1323010.1103/PhysRevB.48.13230 ↗
6. Smolenskii · Sov. Phys. Solid State · 1959 · 1 · 909
7. Cross · Ferroelectrics · 1988 · 76 · 24110.1080/00150198708016945 ↗
8. Viehland · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 46 · 800310.1103/PhysRevB.46.8003 ↗
9. Westphal · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 68 · 84710.1103/PhysRevLett.68.847 ↗
10. Levstik · Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 57 · 1120410.1103/PhysRevB.57.11204 ↗
11. Levstik · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1991 · 66 · 236810.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2368 ↗
12. Viehland · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 46 · 801310.1103/PhysRevB.46.8013 ↗
13. Tagantsev · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 74 · 191010.1063/1.123710 ↗
14. Bobnar · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 589210.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5892 ↗
15. Bobnar · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 76 · 277310.1063/1.126471 ↗
16. Glazounov · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 85 · 219210.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2192 ↗
17. Blinc · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 83 · 42410.1103/PhysRevLett.83.424 ↗
18. Pirc · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 60 · 1347010.1103/PhysRevB.60.13470 ↗
19. Kutnjak · Europhys. Lett. · 2001 · 53 · 67310.1209/epl/i2001-00204-2 ↗