In vivo stiffness of multiple sclerosis lesions is similar to that of normal-appearing white matter
Source abstract
Abstract
In 1868, French neurologist Jean-Martin Charcot coined the term multiple sclerosis (MS) after his observation that numerous white matter (WM) glial scars felt like sclerotic tissue. Nowadays, magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) can generate images with contrast of stiffness (CS) in soft in vivo tissues and may therefore be sensitive to MS lesions, provided that sclerosis is indeed a mechanical signature of this disease. We analyzed CS in a total of 147 lesions in patients with relapsing-remitting MS, compared with control regions in contralateral brain regions, and phantom data as well as performed numerical simulations to determine the delineation limits of multifrequency MRE (20 - 40 Hz) in MS. MRE analysis of simulated waves revealed a delineation limit of approximately 10% CS for detecting 9-mm lesions (mean size in our patient population). Due to inversion bias, this limit is reached when true CS is -11% for soft and 35% for stiff lesions. In vivo MRE identified 35 stiffer lesions and 17 softer lesions compared with surrounding WM (mean stiffness: 934±82 Pa). However, a similar pattern was found in the contralateral brain, suggesting that the range of stiffness changes in WM lesions due to MS is within the normal range of WM variability and normal heterogeneity-related CS. Consequently, Charcot's original intuition that MS is a focal sclerotic disease can neither be dismissed nor confirmed by in vivo MRE. However, the observation that MS lesions do not markedly differ in stiffness from surrounding brain tissue suggests that marked tissue sclerosis is not a mechanical signature of MS. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Multiple sclerosis (MS) was named by J.M. Charcot after the sclerotic changes in brain tissue he found in post-mortem autopsies. Since then, nothing has been revealed about the actual stiffening of MS lesions in vivo. Studying the viscoelastic properties of plaques in their natural environment is a major challenge that can only be overcome by MR elastography (MRE). Therefore, we used multifrequency MRE to answer the question whether MS lesions in patients with a relapsing-remitting disease course are mechanically different than surrounding tissue. Our findings suggest that the range of stiffness changes in white matter lesions due to MS is within the normal range of white matter variability and in vivo tissue sclerosis might not be a mechanical signature of MS.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography · Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (77)
Show source-provided references
1. One hundred and fifty years ago Charcot reported multiple sclerosis as a new neurological disease10.1093/brain/awy287 ↗
2. Acute and chronic demyelinated CNS lesions exhibit opposite elastic properties10.1038/s41598-018-37745-7 ↗
3. The soft mechanical signature of glial scars in the central nervous system10.1038/ncomms14787 ↗
4. Sensitivity of multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging to cellular and stromal integrity of liver tissue10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.03.037 ↗
5. The influence of body temperature on tissue stiffness, blood perfusion, and water diffusion in the mouse brain10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.034 ↗
6. Perfusion alters stiffness of deep gray matter10.1177/0271678X17691530 ↗
7. Hypercapnia increases brain viscoelasticity10.1177/0271678X18799241 ↗
8. Time-resolved response of cerebral stiffness to hypercapnia in humans10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.12.019 ↗
9. Brain stiffens post mortem10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.04.009 ↗
10. Biomechanical properties of the hypoxic and dying brain quantified by magnetic resonance elastography10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.011 ↗
11. Hirsch · 2017
12. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) of the human brain: technique, findings and clinical applications10.1088/0031-9155/61/24/R401 ↗
13. Stiffness and beyond: what MR elastography can tell us about brain structure and function under physiologic and pathologic conditions10.1097/RMR.0000000000000178 ↗
14. MR-elastography reveals degradation of tissue integrity in multiple sclerosis10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.018 ↗
15. Higher-resolution MR elastography reveals early mechanical signatures of neuroinflammation in patients with clinically isolated syndrome10.1002/jmri.25129 ↗
16. Brain viscoelasticity alteration in chronic-progressive multiple sclerosis10.1371/journal.pone.0029888 ↗
17. Multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography of the brain reveals tissue degeneration in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder10.1007/s00330-016-4561-6 ↗
18. Demyelination reduces brain parenchymal stiffness quantified in vivo by magnetic resonance elastography10.1073/pnas.1200151109 ↗
19. Tissue structure and inflammatory processes shape viscoelastic properties of the mouse brain10.1002/nbm.3319 ↗
20. Magnetic resonance elastography reveals altered brain viscoelasticity in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis10.1016/j.nicl.2012.09.003 ↗
21. MR elastography-based assessment of matrix remodeling at lesion sites associated with clinical severity in a model of multiple sclerosis10.3389/fneur.2019.01382 ↗
22. Contribution of tissue inflammation and blood-brain barrier disruption to brain softening in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis10.3389/fnins.2021.701308 ↗
23. Multiple sclerosis lesions are softer than surrounding white matter: an MR elastography study
24. Are multiple sclerosis lesions stiffer or softer than surrounding brain tissue?
25. Diffusion basis spectrum imaging provides insights into MS pathology10.1212/NXI.0000000000000655 ↗
26. Local mechanical properties of white matter structures in the human brain10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.089 ↗
27. Measuring the characteristic topography of brain stiffness with magnetic resonance elastography10.1371/journal.pone.0081668 ↗
28. Towards an elastographic atlas of brain anatomy10.1371/journal.pone.0071807 ↗
29. Heterogeneous multifrequency direct inversion (HMDI) for magnetic resonance elastography with application to a clinical brain exam10.1016/j.media.2018.03.003 ↗
30. Phantom evaluations of nonlinear inversion MR elastography10.1088/1361-6560/aacb08 ↗
31. Thresholds for detecting and characterizing focal lesions using steady-state MR elastography10.1118/1.1556607 ↗
32. A comparison of direct and iterative finite element inversion techniques in dynamic elastography10.1088/0031-9155/61/8/3026 ↗
33. High-resolution mechanical imaging of the human brain by three-dimensional multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography at 7T10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.032 ↗
34. Tomoelastography by multifrequency wave number recovery from time-harmonic propagating shear waves10.1016/j.media.2016.01.001 ↗
35. Superviscous properties of the in vivo brain at large scales10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.027 ↗
36. Cardiac-gated steady-state multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography of the brain: effect of cerebral arterial pulsation on brain viscoelasticity10.1177/0271678X19850936 ↗
37. In vivo wideband multifrequency MR elastography of the human brain and liver10.1002/mrm.26006 ↗
38. In vivo characterization of 3D skull and brain motion during dynamic head vibration using magnetic resonance elastography10.1002/mrm.27347 ↗
39. Penny · 2011
40. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015 ↗
41. Multifrequency inversion in magnetic resonance elastography10.1088/0031-9155/57/8/2329 ↗
42. An analytical solution to the dispersion-by-inversion problem in magnetic resonance elastography10.1002/mrm.28247 ↗
43. Tomoelastography paired with T2* magnetic resonance imaging detects lupus nephritis with normal renal function10.1097/RLI.0000000000000511 ↗
44. Tomoelastography for measurement of tumor volume related to tissue stiffness in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas10.1097/RLI.0000000000000704 ↗
45. Diagnostic performance of tomoelastography of the liver and spleen for staging hepatic fibrosis10.1007/s00330-019-06471-7 ↗
46. Online platform for extendable server-based processing of magnetic resonance elastography data
47. How tissue fluidity influences brain tumor progression10.1073/pnas.1913511116 ↗
48. High-resolution mechanical imaging of glioblastoma by multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography10.1371/journal.pone.0110588 ↗
49. Reduction of breathing artifacts in multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography of the abdomen10.1002/mrm.28558 ↗
50. Real-time multifrequency MR elastography of the human brain reveals rapid changes in viscoelasticity in response to the Valsalva Maneuver
51. Wavelet shrinkage: asymptopia?10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02032.x ↗
52. Fast tomoelastography of the mouse brain by multifrequency single-shot MR elastography10.1002/mrm.27586 ↗
53. Real-time MR elastography for viscoelasticity quantification in skeletal muscle during dynamic exercises10.1002/mrm.28095 ↗
54. Nonlinear multiscale regularisation in MR elastography: towards fine feature mapping10.1016/j.media.2016.05.012 ↗
55. Symmetry and asymmetry analysis and its implications to computer-aided diagnosis: a review of the literature10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.003 ↗
56. The revised brain symmetry index10.1016/j.clinph.2007.07.019 ↗
57. Measuring the effects of aging and sex on regional brain stiffness with MR elastography in healthy older adults10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.016 ↗
58. MR elastography of the brain and its application in neurological diseases10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.008 ↗
59. Standard-space atlas of the viscoelastic properties of the human brain10.1002/hbm.25192 ↗
60. Algebraic Helmholtz inversion in planar magnetic resonance elastography10.1088/0031-9155/53/12/005 ↗
61. Viscoelastic properties of individual glial cells and neurons in the CNS10.1073/pnas.0606150103 ↗
62. Reactive glial cells: increased stiffness correlates with increased intermediate filament expression10.1096/fj.10-163790 ↗
63. Acquired demyelination but not genetic developmental defects in myelination leads to brain tissue stiffness changes10.1016/j.brain.2020.100019 ↗
64. Fibronectin aggregation in multiple sclerosis lesions impairs remyelination10.1093/brain/aws313 ↗
65. Mechanics in neuronal development and repair10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150045 ↗
66. Tomoelastography based on multifrequency MR elastography for prostate cancer detection: comparison with multiparametric MRI10.1148/radiol.2021201852 ↗
67. Gadolinium in human brain sections and colocalization with other elements10.1212/NXI.0000000000000515 ↗
68. Gadopentetate but not gadobutrol accumulates in the dentate nucleus of multiple sclerosis patients10.1177/1352458516670738 ↗
69. Effect of aging on the viscoelastic properties of hippocampal subfields assessed with high-resolution MR elastography10.1093/cercor/bhaa388 ↗
70. In vivo viscoelastic properties of the brain in normal pressure hydrocephalus10.1002/nbm.1602 ↗
71. Combining viscoelasticity, diffusivity and volume of the hippocampus for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease based on magnetic resonance imaging10.1016/j.nicl.2017.12.023 ↗
72. Magnetic resonance elastography of the in vivo human brain using multifrequency wavenumber analysis in 2D and 3D
73. Simultaneous multislice rapid magnetic resonance elastography of the liver10.1002/nbm.4252 ↗
74. Magnetic resonance elastography of the human brain using a multiphase DENSE acquisition10.1002/mrm.27672 ↗
75. TURBINE-MRE: a 3D hybrid radial-Cartesian EPI acquisition for MR elastography10.1002/mrm.28445 ↗
76. Artificial neural networks for magnetic resonance elastography stiffness estimation in inhomogeneous materials10.1016/j.media.2020.101710 ↗
77. Robust MR elastography stiffness quantification using a localized divergence free finite element reconstruction10.1016/j.media.2017.12.005 ↗