journal article·2021-09

A stochastic micro to macro mechanical model for the evolution of bone-implant interface stiffness

Jing Xie, Daniel Rittel, Keren Shemtov-Yona, Furqan A. Shah, Anders Palmquist

Acta Biomaterialia· Volume 131
Publisher page

Abstract

Upon placement of an implant into living bone, an interface is formed through which various biochemical, biological, physical, and mechanical interactions take place. This interface evolves over time as the mechanical properties of peri-implant bone increase. Owing to the multifactorial nature of interfacial processes, it is challenging to devise a comprehensive model for predicting the mechanical behavior of the bone-implant interface. We propose a simple spatio-temporally evolving mechanical model - from an elementary unit cell comprising randomly oriented mineralized collagen fibrils having randomly assigned stiffness all the way up to a macroscopic bone-implant interface in a gap healing scenario. Each unit cell has an assigned Young's modulus value between 1.62 GPa and 25.73 GPa corresponding to minimum (i.e., 0) and maximum (i.e., 0.4) limits of mineral volume fraction, respectively, in the overlap region of the mineralized collagen fibril. Gap closure and subsequent stiffening are modeled to reflect the two main directions of peri-implant bone formation, i.e., contact osteogenesis and distance osteogenesis. The linear elastic stochastic finite element model reveals highly nonlinear temporal evolution of bone-implant interface stiffness, strongly dictated by the specific kinetics of contact osteogenesis and distance osteogenesis. The bone-implant interface possesses a small stiffness until gap closure, which subsequently evolves into a much higher stiffness, and this transition is reminiscent of a percolation transition whose threshold corresponds to gap closure. The model presented here, albeit preliminary, can be incorporated into future calculations of the bone-implant system where the interface is well-defined mechanically. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: A simple, physically informed model for the mechanical characteristics of the bone-implant interface is still missing. Here, we start by extending the reported mechanical characteristics of a one cubic micrometre unit cell to a 250 µm long interface made of 1 µm thick layers. The stiffness of each cell (based on mineral content) is assigned randomly to mimic bone micro-heterogeneity. The numerical study of this interface representative structure allows for the simultaneous determination of the spatio-temporal evolution of the mechanical response at local (discrete element) and global (overall model) scales. The proposed model is the first of this kind that can easily be incorporated into realistic future models of bone-implant interaction with emphasis on implant stability and different loading conditions.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws
2. Long-term (10-year) dental implant survival: a systematic review and sensitivity meta-analysis10.1016/j.jdent.2019.03.008 ↗
3. Lindhe · 2015
4. Osseointegration and current interpretations of the bone-implant interface10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.018 ↗
5. Osseointegrated titanium implants: requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man10.3109/17453678108991776 ↗
6. A multiscale analytical approach to evaluate osseointegration10.1007/s10856-018-6068-y ↗
7. Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00160-X ↗
8. Bone bonding at natural and biomaterial surfaces10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.049 ↗
9. A review of improved fixation methods for dental implants. part II: biomechanical integrity at bone-implant interface10.1016/j.jpor.2015.01.003 ↗
10. Determination of the heterogeneous anisotropic elastic properties of human femoral bone: from nanoscopic to organ scale10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.034 ↗
11. 3D hierarchical geometric modeling and multiscale FE analysis as a base for individualized medical diagnosis of bone structure10.1016/j.bone.2010.12.022 ↗
12. On the road to personalized medicine: multiscale computational modeling of bone tissue10.1007/s11831-014-9120-1 ↗
13. The failure envelope concept applied to the bone-dental implant system10.1038/s41598-017-02282-2 ↗
14. Modeling the effect of osseointegration on dental implant pullout and torque removal tests10.1111/cid.12645 ↗
15. G. Haïat, X. Gao, M. Fraulob, Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2019.0259.10.1098/rsif.2019.0259 ↗
16. Nonlinear finite element analysis versus ex vivo strain gauge measurements on immediately loaded implants
17. Micromechanical modeling of the contact stiffness of an osseointegrated bone-implant interface10.1186/s12938-019-0733-3 ↗
18. Micromotion-induced strain fields influence early stages of repair at bone-implant interfaces10.1016/j.actbio.2013.01.014 ↗
19. Bone hierarchical structure in three dimensions10.1016/j.actbio.2014.05.024 ↗
20. Magnesium whitlockite – omnipresent in pathological mineralisation of soft tissues but not a significant inorganic constituent of bone10.1016/j.actbio.2021.02.021 ↗
21. The nanometre-scale physiology of bone: steric modelling and scanning transmission electron microscopy of collagen-mineral structure10.1098/rsif.2011.0880 ↗
22. Large deformation mechanisms, plasticity, and failure of an individual collagen fibril with different mineral content10.1002/jbmr.2705 ↗
23. The nanocomposite nature of bone drives its strength and damage resistance10.1038/nmat4719 ↗
24. Modeling dental implant insertion10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.021 ↗
25. The bone-implant interface - nanoscale analysis of clinically retrieved dental implants10.1016/j.nano.2014.05.015 ↗
26. The bone-implant interface of dental implants in humans on the atomic scale10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.044 ↗
27. Where bone meets implant: the characterization of nano-osseointegration10.1039/c3nr00826f ↗
28. Spatio-temporal evolution of hydroxyapatite crystal thickness at the bone-implant interface10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.021 ↗
29. High-resolution visualization of the osteocyte lacuno-canalicular network juxtaposed to the surface of nanotextured titanium implants in human10.1021/ab500127y ↗
30. Direct communication between osteocytes and acid-etched titanium implants with a sub-micron topography10.1007/s10856-016-5779-1 ↗
31. Bone nanostructure near titanium and porous tantalum implants studied by scanning small angle x-ray scattering10.22203/eCM.v012a10 ↗
32. Mineralized collagen fibril network spatial arrangement influences cortical bone fracture behavior10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.10.038 ↗
33. A finite element study evaluating the influence of mineralization distribution and content on the tensile mechanical response of mineralized collagen fibril networks10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.07.019 ↗
34. Effect of modifications in mineralized collagen fibril and extra-fibrillar matrix material properties on submicroscale mechanical behavior of cortical bone10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.03.013 ↗
35. Understanding Peri-Implant Endosseous Healing10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.8.tb03681.x ↗
36. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions
37. Regional trabecular bone matrix degeneration and osteocyte death in femora of glucocorticoid-treated rabbits10.1210/endo.142.3.8048 ↗
38. Osteoblasts and collagen orientation10.1007/BF00231996 ↗
39. The orientation of nanoscale apatite platelets in relation to osteoblastic–osteocyte lacunae on trabecular bone surface10.1007/s00223-015-0072-8 ↗
40. Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate10.1126/science.996549 ↗
41. A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in-vitro experiments10.1115/1.2720906 ↗
42. Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00073-2 ↗
43. ِABAQUS, Simulia, Abaqus/CAE Version 6.14-2. (2014).
44. Numerical errors and uncertainties in finite-element modeling of trabecular bone10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00108-0 ↗
45. Predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00099-8 ↗
46. Who's afraid of the big bad Wolff?: “Wolff's law” and bone functional adaptation10.1002/ajpa.20371 ↗
47. Mechanical modulation at the lamellar level in osteonal bone10.1557/jmr.2006.0234 ↗
48. Elasticity of alveolar bone near dental implant-bone interfaces after one month's healing10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00113-1 ↗
49. Structure and mechanical quality of the collagen-mineral nano-composite in bone10.1039/B402005G ↗
50. Applied Plastics Engineering Handbook
51. Bone's mechanostat: A 2003 update10.1002/ar.a.10119 ↗
52. New suggestions for the mechanical control of bone remodeling10.1007/s00223-009-9242-x ↗
53. Mathematical model for bone mineralization10.3389/fcell.2015.00051 ↗
54. Newly formed and remodeled human bone exhibits differences in the mineralization process10.1016/j.actbio.2020.01.004 ↗
55. Bone tissue aging affects mineralization of cement lines10.1016/j.bone.2018.02.004 ↗
56. Bone remodelling in humans is load-driven but not lazy10.1038/ncomms5855 ↗
57. Mechanical signals as anabolic agents in bone10.1038/nrrheum.2009.239 ↗
58. Mechanical regulation of bone formation and resorption around implants in a mouse model of osteopenic bone10.1098/rsif.2018.0667 ↗