Reinvestigation of quantum dot symmetry: the symmetric group of the 8-band k⋅p theory Hamiltonian
Source abstract
Abstract
Self-assembled semiconductor quantum dots, usually formed in pyramid or lens shapes, have an intrinsic geometric symmetry. However, the geometric symmetry of a quantum dot is not identical to the symmetry of the associated Hamiltonian. It is a well-accepted conclusion that the symmetric group of the Hamiltonians for both pyramidal and lens-shaped quantum dots is C2v; consequently, the eigenstate of the Hamiltonian is not degenerate because C2v has only one-dimensional irreducible representations. In this paper, we show the above conclusion is wrong. Using the 8-band k · p theory model and considering the action of group elements on both spatial and electron spin parts of the wavefunction, we find the symmetric group of the Hamiltonian is the C2v double group not C2v. C2v is the symmetric group of the spatial part of the conduction band Hamiltonian only when the inter-band coupling is totally ignored. Employing the C2v double group symmetry, we prove that although the C2v double group has both one-dimensional and two-dimensional irreducible representations, the eigenstates of the 8 × 8 Hamiltonian are always two-fold degenerate and that these degenerate states only correspond to the two-dimensional irreducible representation of the C2v double group. The double group symmetry originates from the coupling between spatial potential and electron half spin. This coupling causes a full 2π rotation in the wavefunction space or the Hilbert space not equal to the unity operation. Finally, the connection between the two-fold degeneracy due to the C2v double group symmetry and Kramers’ degeneracy due to the time inversion symmetry is explored.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahmed S, Islam S, Mohammed S (2010) Electronic structure of InN/GaN quantum dots: multimillion-atom tight-binding simulations. IEEE Trans Elect Dev 57:164–17310.1109/TED.2009.2035531 ↗
2. Belling SW, Chihak HL, Li W (2018) Finite element analysis of strain effects on symmetry reduction of semiconductor quantum dots. Superlattice Microst 120:22–3010.1016/j.spmi.2018.05.015 ↗
3. Bester G, Zunger A (2005) Cylindrically shaped zinc-blende semiconductor quantum dots do not have cylindrical symmetry: atomistic symmetry, atomic relaxation, and piezoelectric effects. Phys Rev B71:04531810.1103/PhysRevB.71.045318 ↗
4. Bester G, Zunger A, Wu X, Vanderbilt D (2006) Effects of linear and nonlinear piezoelectricity on the electronic properties of InAs/GaAs quantum dots. Phys Rev B74:08130510.1103/PhysRevB.74.081305 ↗
5. Chuang SL (2009) Physics of photonic devices. Wiley, New York
6. Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Jorio A (2008) Group theory-application to the physics of condensed matter. Springer-Verlag, New York
7. Ehrhardt M, Koprucki T (eds) (2014) Multiband effective mass approximations, chapter 3, Springer, New York10.1007/978-3-319-01427-2 ↗
8. Foreman BA (1997) Elimination of spurious solutions from eight-band k.p theory. Phys Rev B 56:R1274810.1103/PhysRevB.56.R12748 ↗
9. Huffaker DL, Park G, Zou Z, Shchekin OB, Deppe DG (1998) 1.3 μm room-temperature GaAs-based quantum-dot laser. Appl Phys Lett 73:256410.1063/1.122534 ↗
10. Klimeck G, Ahmed S, Kharche N, Bae H, Clark S, Haley B, Lee S, Naumov M, Ryu H, Saied F, Prada M, Korkusinski M, Boykin TB (2007) Atomistic simulation of realistically sized nanodevices using NEMO 3-D - Part I: Models and benchmarks. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 54:2079–208910.1109/TED.2007.902879 ↗
11. Landau LD, Lifshitz LM (1991) Quantum mechanics non-relativistic theory, 3rd edn. Butterwoth-Heinemann, New York
12. Li W, Belling SW (2017) Symmetric analysis, categorization, and optical spectrum of ideal pyramid quantum dots. J Phys D Appl Phys 50:43510210.1088/1361-6463/aa8aed ↗
13. Nozik AJ, Beard MC, Luthe JM, Law M, Ellingson RJ, Johnson JC (2010) Semiconductor quantum dots and quantum dot arrays and applications of multiple exciton generation to third-generation photovoltaic solar cells. Chem Rev 110:6873–689010.1021/cr900289f ↗
14. Park IK, Kwon M, Kim J, Seo SB, Kim JY, Lim J, Park SJ (2007) Green light-emitting diodes with self-assembled In-rich InGaN quantum dots. Appl Phys Lett 91:13310510.1063/1.2790783 ↗
15. Pryor C (1998) Eight-band calculations of strained InAs/GaAs quantum dots compared with one-, four-, and six-band approximations. Phys Rev B57:719010.1103/PhysRevB.57.7190 ↗
16. Schliwa A, Winkelnkemper M, Bimberg D (2007) Impact of size, shape, and composition on piezoelectric effects and electronic properties of In(Ga)As/GaAs quantum dots. Phys Rev B76:20532410.1103/PhysRevB.76.205324 ↗
17. Stier O, Grundmann M, Bimberg D (1999) Electronic and optical properties of strained quantum dots modeled by 8-band k·p theory. Phys Rev B59:568810.1103/PhysRevB.59.5688 ↗
18. Tinkham M (2003) Group theory and quantum mechanics. Dover Publications Inc., New York
19. Tomic S (2006) Electronic structure of InyGa1-yAs1-xNx/GaAs(N) quantum dots by ten-band k∙p theory. Phys Rev B73:12534810.1103/PhysRevB.73.125348 ↗
20. Tomic S, Vukmirovic N (2011) Symmetry reduction in multiband Hamiltonians for semiconductor quantum dots: the role of interfaces and higher energy bands. J Appl Phys 110:053710 and its supplementary materials10.1063/1.3631048 ↗
21. Veprek RG, Steiger S, Witzigmann B (2007) Ellipticity and the spurious solution problem of k∙p envelope equations. Phys Rev B76:16532010.1103/PhysRevB.76.165320 ↗
22. Vukmirovic N, Indjin D, Jovanovic VD, Ikonic Z, Harrison P (2005) Symmetry of k∙p Hamiltonian in pyramidal InAs/GaAs quantum dots: application to the calculation of electronic structure. Phys Rev B72:07535610.1103/PhysRevB.72.075356 ↗
23. Wang ZM (2008) Self-assembled quantum dots. Springer, New York10.1007/978-0-387-74191-8 ↗
24. Zielke R, Maier F, Loss D (2014) Anisotropic g factor in InAs self-assembled quantum dots. Phys Rev B 89:11543810.1103/PhysRevB.89.115438 ↗