Measuring Friedel pairs in nanomembranes of GaAs (001)
Source abstract
Abstract
Friedel pairs are susceptible to symmetry breaking in crystals. Under resonant scattering conditions, non-centrosymmetric crystals can give rise to pairs of hkl and $$\bar{h}\bar{k}\bar{l}$$ reflections with different diffracted intensities, which are quantified as an anomalous signal of the structure. In bulk crystals, the shift in the anomalous signal through an absorption edge can be measured with good accuracy regardless the crystalline quality of the sample, leading to experimental values in agreement with theoretical ones. With the advance of nanotechnology and synchrotron sources, it has been possible to produce free-standing nanomembranes of semiconductor crystals, opening the opportunity of checking the measurability of anomalous signal in nanoscale materials. In this study, we describe a successful procedure to measure the anomalous signal in nanomembranes of GaAs (001) 15-nm thick with synchrotron radiation. Different membrane processing methods and diffraction geometries were tested, and major sources of instrumental inaccuracy were identified. Relevances of this type of measurements in nanotechnology as well as in basic science are discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Near-Field Optical Microscopy · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (10)
Show source-provided references
1. Azimonte C, Granado E, Terashita H, Park S, Cheong S-W (2010) Polar atomic displacements in multiferroics observed via anomalous X-ray diffraction. Phys Rev B 81:12103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.01210310.1103/PhysRevB.81.012103 ↗
2. Deneke C, Muller C, Jin-Phillipp NY, Schmidt OG (2002) Diameter scalability of rolled-up In(Ga)As/GaAs nanotubes. Semicond Sci Technol 17:1278–1281. doi: 10.1088/0268-1242/17/12/31210.1088/0268-1242/17/12/312 ↗
3. Giacovazzo C (ed) (2002) Fundamentals of crystallography, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
4. Hubbell JH, Veigele WmJ, Briggs EA, Brown RT, Cromer DT, Howerton RJ (1975) Atomic form factors, incoherent scattering functions, and photon scattering cross sections. J Phys Chem Ref Data 4:471–538. doi: 10.1063/1.55552310.1063/1.555523 ↗
5. Lovesey SW, Collins SP (1996) X-ray scattering and absorption by magnetic materials. Clarendon press, Oxford10.1093/oso/9780198517375.001.0001 ↗
6. Malachias A, Mei YF, Annabattula RK, Deneke C, Onck PR, Schmidt OG (2008) Wrinkled-up nanochannel networks: long-range ordering, scalability, and X-ray investigation. ACS Nano 2:1715–1721. doi: 10.1021/nn800308p10.1021/nn800308p ↗
7. Malachias A, Freitas R, Morelhão S, Magalhães-Paniago R, Kycia S, Medeiros-Ribeiro G (2012) X-ray diffraction methods for studying strain and composition in epitaxial nanostructured systems. In: Haight R, Ross FM, Hannon JB, Feldman LC (eds) Handbook of instrumentation and techniques for semiconductor nanostructure characterization. World Scientific, Hackensack, pp 256–324
8. Pietsch U, Holý V, Baumbach T (2004) High-resolution X-ray scattering: from thin films to lateral nanostructures. Springer, New York10.1007/978-1-4757-4050-9 ↗
9. Prince E (ed) (2006) International tables for crystallography, volume C: mathematical, physical and chemical tables. Wiley, New York, pp 554–590
10. Rastelli A, Ding F, Plumhof JD, Kumar S, Trotta R, Deneke C, Malachias A, Atkinson P, Zallo E, Zander T, Herklotz A, Singh R, Krápek V, Schröter JR, Kiravittaya S, Benyoucef M, Hafenbrak R, Jöns KD, Thurmer DJ, Grimm D, Bester G, Dörr K, Michler P, Schmidt OG (2012) Controlling quantum dot emission by integration of semiconductor nanomembranes onto piezoelectric actuators. Phys Status Solidi (b) 249:687–696. doi: 10.1002/pssb.20110077510.1002/pssb.201100775 ↗