journal article·2013-09

Electrical conductance of carbon nanotubes with misaligned ends

Antonio Pantano, Giuseppe Muratore, Nicola Montinaro

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 15· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

During a manufacturing process, when a straight carbon nanotube is placed on a substrate, e.g., production of transistors, its two ends are often misaligned. In this study, we investigate the effects of multiwall carbon nanotubes’ (MWCNTs) outer diameter and chirality on the change in conductance due to misalignment of the two ends. The length of the studied MWCNTs was 120 nm, while the diameters ranged between 4 and 7 nm. A mixed finite element-tight-binding approach was carefully designed to realize reduction in computational time by orders of magnitude in calculating the deformation-induced changes in the electrical transport properties of the nanotubes. Numerical results suggest that armchair MWCNTs of small diameter should work better if used as conductors, while zigzag MWCNTs of large diameter are more suitable for building sensors.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Baughman RH, Zakhidov AA, de Heer WA (2002) Carbon nanotubes–the route toward applications. Science 297:78710.1126/science.1060928 ↗
2. Bernholc J, Brenner D, Buongiorno Nardelli M, Meunier V, Roland C (2002) Mechanical and electrical properties of nanotubes. Annu Rev Mat Res 32:34710.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112601.134925 ↗
3. Buongiorno Nardelli M (1999) Electronic transport in extended systems: application to carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B 60:782810.1103/PhysRevB.60.7828 ↗
4. Charlier JC, Lambin Ph, Ebbesen TW (1997) Electronic properties of carbon nanotubes with polygonized cross sections. Phys Rev B 54:R837710.1103/PhysRevB.54.R8377 ↗
5. Choi HJ, Ihm J, Yoon Y, Louie SG (1999) Possible explanation for the conductance of a single quantum unit in metallic carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B 58:R1400910.1103/PhysRevB.60.R14009 ↗
6. Datta S (1995) Electronic transport in mesoscopic systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511805776 ↗
7. Delaney P, Di Ventra M, Pantelides ST (1999) Quantized conductance of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Appl Phys Lett 75:378710.1063/1.125456 ↗
8. Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Avouris P (2001) Carbon nanotubes. Springer, Heidelberg10.1007/3-540-39947-X ↗
9. Ebbesen TW, Takada T (1995) Topological and SP3 defect structures in nanotubes. Carbon 33:97310.1016/0008-6223(95)00025-9 ↗
10. Farajian AA, Yakobson BI, Mizuseki H, Kawazoe Y (2003) Electronic transport through bent carbon nanotubes: nanoelectromechanical sensors and switches. Phys Rev B 67:20542310.1103/PhysRevB.67.205423 ↗
11. Fisher DS, Lee PA (1981) Relation between conductivity and transmission matrix. Phys Rev B 23:685110.1103/PhysRevB.23.6851 ↗
12. Frank S, Poncharal P, Wang ZL, de Heer WA (1998) Carbon nanotube quantum resistors. Science 280:174410.1126/science.280.5370.1744 ↗
13. Hierold C, Jungen A, Stampfer C, Helbling T (2007) Nano electromechanical sensors based on carbon nanotubes. Sens Actuators A 136:5110.1016/j.sna.2007.02.007 ↗
14. Kong J, Yenilmez E, Tombler TW, Kim W, Dai H, Laughlin RB, Liu L, Jayanthi CS, Wu SY (2001) Quantum interference and ballistic transmission in nanotube electron waveguides. Phys Rev Lett 87:10680110.1103/PhysRevLett.87.106801 ↗
15. Kuzumaki T, Mitsuda Y (2004) Dynamic measurement of electrical conductivity of carbon nanotubes during mechanical deformation by nanoprobe manipulation in transmission electron microscopy. Appl Phys Lett 85:125010.1063/1.1784536 ↗
16. Kwon Y, Tománek D (1998) Electronic and structural properties of multiwall carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B 58:R1600110.1103/PhysRevB.58.R16001 ↗
17. Landauer R (1970) Electrical resistance of disordered one-dimensional lattices. Philos Mag 21:86310.1080/14786437008238472 ↗
18. Lassagne B, Bachtold A (2010) Carbon nanotube electromechanical resonator for ultrasensitive mass/force sensing. CR Phys 11:35510.1016/j.crhy.2010.06.006 ↗
19. Lee DH, Joannopoulos JD (1981) Simple scheme for surface-band calculations: II. The Green’s function. Phys Rev B 23:498810.1103/PhysRevB.23.4988 ↗
20. Li S, Yu Z, Yen S, Tang W, Burke P (2004) Carbon nanotube transistor operation at 2.6 GHz. Nano Lett 4:75310.1021/nl0498740 ↗
21. Liu B, Jiang H, Johnson HT, Huang Y (2004) The influence of mechanical deformation on the electrical properties of single wall carbon nanotubes. J Mech Phys Solids 52:110.1016/S0022-5096(03)00112-1 ↗
22. Lopez-Sancho MP, Lopez-Sancho JM, Rubio J (1984) Quick iterative scheme for the calculation of transfer matrices: application to Mo (100). J Phys F 14:120510.1088/0305-4608/14/5/016 ↗
23. Lu J, Wu J, Duan W, Liu F, Zhu B, Gu B (2003) Metal-to-semiconductor transition in squashed armchair carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett 90:15660110.1103/PhysRevLett.90.156601 ↗
24. Maiti A, Svizhenko A, Anantram MP (2002) Electronic transport through carbon nanotubes: effects of structural deformation and tube chirality. Phys Rev Lett 88:12680510.1103/PhysRevLett.88.126805 ↗
25. Mdarhri A, Alamarguy D, Houzé F, Noël S, Volz S, Li H, Bai JB (2011) Multi-scale investigation of electronic transport and electromechanical behavior in carbon nanotube materials. Composites B 42:209810.1016/j.compositesb.2011.05.003 ↗
26. Meir Y, Wingreen NS (1992) Landauer formula for the current through an interacting electron region. Phys Rev Lett 68:251210.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2512 ↗
27. Meunier V, Buongiorno Nardelli M, Roland C, Bernholc (2001) Structural and electronic properties of carbon nanotube tapers. J Phys Rev B 64:19541910.1103/PhysRevB.64.195419 ↗
28. Minot ED, Yaish Y, Sazonova V, Park JY, Brink M, McEuen PL (2003) Tuning carbon nanotube band gaps with strain. Phys Rev Lett 90:15640110.1103/PhysRevLett.90.156401 ↗
29. Pantano A, Buongiorno Nardelli M (2009) Simulation of the electromechanical behavior of multiwall carbon nanotubes. ACS Nano 3:326610.1021/nn900795n ↗
30. Pantano A, Parks DM, Boyce MC (2003) Nonlinear structural mechanics based modeling of carbon nanotube deformation. Phys Rev Lett 91:14550410.1103/PhysRevLett.91.145504 ↗
31. Pantano A, Boyce MC, Parks DM (2004a) Mechanics of axial compression of single and multi-wall carbon nanotubes. J Eng Mater Technol Trans, ASME 126:27910.1115/1.1752926 ↗
32. Pantano A, Boyce MC, Parks DM (2004b) Mechanics of deformation of single and multiwall carbon nanotubes. J Mech Phys Solids 52:78910.1016/j.jmps.2003.08.004 ↗
33. Pantano A, Parks DM, Boyce MC, Buongiorno Nardelli M (2004c) Mixed finite element-tight-binding electromechanical analysis of carbon nanotubes. J Appl Phys 92:675610.1063/1.1809252 ↗
34. Pantano A, Campanella D, Montinaro N, Cerniglia D (2013) Electronic properties of carbon nanotubes under torsion. Appl Phys A 110:7710.1007/s00339-012-7415-3 ↗
35. Passacantando M, Bussolotti F, Santucci S (2010) Tuning electromechanical response of individual CNT by selective electron beam induced deposition. J Non Cryst Solids 356:203810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.05.031 ↗
36. Paulson S, Falvo MR, Snider N, Helser A, Hudson T, Seeger A, Taylor RM, Superfine R, Washburna S (1999) In situ resistance measurements of strained carbon nanotubes. Appl Phys Lett 75:293610.1063/1.125193 ↗
37. Porezag D, Frauenheim Th, Kohler Th, Seifert G, Kaschner R (1995) Construction of tight-binding-like potentials on the basis of density-functional theory: application to carbon. Phys Rev B 51:1294710.1103/PhysRevB.51.12947 ↗
38. Postma HWCh, Teepen T, Yao Z, Grifoni M, Dekker C (2001) Carbon nanotube single-electron transistors at room temperature. Science 293:7610.1126/science.1061797 ↗
39. Rochefort A, Avouris P, Lesage F, Salahub DR (1999) Electrical and mechanical properties of distorted carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B 60:1382410.1103/PhysRevB.60.13824 ↗
40. Saito R, Dresselhaus G, Dresselhaus MS (1998) Physical properties of carbon nanotubes. Imperial College Press, London10.1142/p080 ↗
41. Sani A, Darbari S, Abdi Y, Arzi E (2012) Using bent carbon nanotubes for the fabrication of electromechanical switches. Carbon 50:363510.1016/j.carbon.2012.03.035 ↗
42. Sanvito S, Kwon Y, Tománek D, Lambert CJ (2000) Fractional quantum conductance in carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett 84:197410.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1974 ↗
43. Tekleab D, Carroll DL, Samsonidze GG, Yakobson BI (2001) Strain-induced electronic property heterogeneity of a carbon nanotube. Phys Rev B 64:03541910.1103/PhysRevB.64.035419 ↗
44. Xu CH, Wang CZ, Chan CT, Ho KM (1992) A transferable tight-binding potential for carbon. J Phys 4:6047
45. Yang L, Han J (2000) Electronic structure of deformed carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett 85:15410.1103/PhysRevLett.85.154 ↗
46. Yu MF, Lourie O, Dyer MJ, Noloni K, Kelly TF, Ruoff RS (2000) Strength and breaking mechanism of multiwalled carbon nanotubes under tensile load. Science 287:63710.1126/science.287.5453.637 ↗