journal article·2017-01

A viscoelastic analysis of the P56 mouse brain under large-deformation dynamic indentation

David B. MacManus, Baptiste Pierrat, Jeremiah G. Murphy, Michael D. Gilchrist

Acta Biomaterialia· Volume 48
Publisher page

Abstract

The brain is a complex organ made up of many different functional and structural regions consisting of different types of cells such as neurons and glia, as well as complex anatomical geometries. It is hypothesized that the different regions of the brain exhibit significantly different mechanical properties which may be attributed to the diversity of cells within individual brain regions. The regional viscoelastic properties of P56 mouse brain tissue, up to 70μm displacement, are presented and discussed in the context of traumatic brain injury, particularly how the different regions of the brain respond to mechanical loads. Force-relaxation data obtained from micro-indentation measurements were fit to both linear and quasi-linear viscoelastic models to determine the time and frequency domain viscoelastic response of the pons, cortex, medulla oblongata, cerebellum, and thalamus. The damping ratio of each region was also determined. Each region was found to have a unique mechanical response to the applied displacement, with the pons and thalamus exhibiting the largest and smallest force-response, respectively. All brain regions appear to have an optimal frequency for the dissipation of energies which lies between 1 and 10Hz. Statement of significance We present the first mechanical characterization of the viscoelastic response for different regions of mouse brain. Force-relaxation tests are performed under large strain dynamic micro-indentation, and viscoelastic models are used subsequently, providing time-dependent mechanical properties of brain tissue under loading conditions comparable to what is experienced in TBI. The unique mechanical properties of different brain regions are highlighted, with substantial variations in the viscoelastic properties and damping ratio of each region. Cortex and pons were the stiffest regions, while the thalamus and medulla were most compliant. The cerebellum and thalamus had highest damping ratio values and those of the medulla were lowest. The reported material parameters can be implemented into finite element computer models of the mouse to investigate the effects of trauma on individual brain regions.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics · Elasticity and Material Modeling · Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Faul · 2010
2. A systematic review of brain injury epidemiology in Europe10.1007/s00701-005-0651-y ↗
3. Changing patterns in the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury10.1038/nrneurol.2013.22 ↗
4. Consequences of head size following trauma to the human head10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00202-0 ↗
5. Development of a finite element human head model partially validated with thirty-five experimental cases10.1115/1.4025101 ↗
6. The creation of three-dimensional finite element models for simulating head impact biomechanics10.1533/ijcr.2003.0243 ↗
7. Development and validation of a human head mechanical model
8. England · 1996 · 10
9. Biomechanics of traumatic brain injury10.1016/j.cma.2008.06.006 ↗
10. Mechanical Characterization of brain tissue in simple compression at dynamic strain rates10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.01.022 ↗
11. Mechanical characterization of brain tissue in simple shear at dynamic strain rates10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.07.017 ↗
12. The influence of anisotropy on brain injury prediction10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.036 ↗
13. Spherical indentation of soft matter beyond the Hertzian regime: numerical and experimental validation of hyperelastic models10.1007/s10237-008-0139-9 ↗
14. On the applicability of Sneddon’s solution for interpreting the indentation of nonlinear elastic biopolymers10.1115/1.4027973 ↗
15. Dynamic regional mechanical properties of the porcine brain: indentation in the coronal plane10.1115/1.4004494 ↗
16. Mechanical characterization of the P56 mouse brain under large deformation dynamic indentation10.1038/srep21569 ↗
17. Finite element implementation of anisotropic quasi-linear viscoelasticity using a discrete spectrum approximation10.1115/1.2834308 ↗
18. Menard · 2008 · 151
19. Dynamic mechanical properties of murine brain tissue using micro-indentation10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.06.028 ↗
20. Effect of inter-species, gender, and breeding on the mechanical behavior of brain tissue10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.077 ↗
21. Brain protein preservation largely depends on the postmortem storage temperature: implications for study of proteins in human neurologic diseases and management of brain banks: a BrainNet Europe study10.1097/nen.0b013e31802c3e7d ↗
22. Postmortem changes in the level of brain proteins10.1006/exnr.2000.7529 ↗
23. A proposed injury threshold for mild traumatic brain injury10.1115/1.1691446 ↗
24. J. Antona-Makoshi, J. Davidsson, S. Ejima, K. Ono, Reanalysis of monkey head concussion data using a novel monkey finite element model to develop brain tissue injury reference values, in: IRCOBI Conference, 2012, IRC-12-54, 441–454.
25. Viscoelastic properties of the P17 and adult rat brain from indentation in the coronal plane10.1115/1.4025386 ↗
26. A comprehensive experimental study on material properties of human brain tissue10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.09.001 ↗
27. Mechanical properties of brain tissue by indentation: interregional variation10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.09.001 ↗
28. Mechanical properties of porcine brain tissue in the coronal plane: interregional variation of the corona radiata10.1007/s10439-015-1350-3 ↗
29. Linear viscoelastic properties of bovine brain tissue in shear
30. Neuronal response to high-rate shear deformation depends on heterogeneity of the local strain field10.1089/neu.2006.23.1304 ↗
31. Viscoelastic properties of human cerebellum using magnetic resonance elastography10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.034 ↗
32. Viscoelastic properties of the rat brain in the sagittal plane: effects of anatomical structure and age10.1007/s10439-011-0394-2 ↗
33. Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.030 ↗
34. Measuring the linear and nonlinear elastic properties of brain tissue with shear waves and inverse analysis10.1007/s10237-015-0658-0 ↗
35. Material characterization of in vivo and in vitro porcine brain using shear wave elasticity10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.10.019 ↗
36. Tolerance curves of acceleration and intracranial pressure and protective index in experimental head injury10.1097/00005373-196609000-00005 ↗
37. Modelling and accident reconstruction of head impact injuries10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.245-246.417 ↗
38. Current and future concepts in helmet and sports injury prevention
39. The influence of test conditions on characterization of the mechanical properties of brain tissue
40. Dynamic mechanical response of brain tissue in vivo, in situ and in vitro10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.032 ↗
41. Development of hyaluronic acid-based scaffolds for brain tissue engineering10.1016/j.actbio.2009.03.033 ↗
42. Measurement of the force required to move a neurosurgical probe through in vivo human brain tissue10.1109/10.771205 ↗
43. Strain-rate dependent induction of reactive astrogliosis and cell death in three-dimensional neuronal-astrocytic co-cultures10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.070 ↗
44. Atkin · 2005 · 79
45. On the generality of the relationship among contact stiffness, contact area, and elastic modulus during indentation10.1557/JMR.1992.0613 ↗
46. Experimental verification of brain tissue incompressibility using digital image correlation10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.03.028 ↗
47. Animal models of traumatic brain injury10.1038/nrn3407 ↗
48. K.B. Bernick, T.P. Prevost, S. Suresh, S. Socrate, Mechanical loading of neurons and astrocytes with application to blast traumatic brain injury, in: The 27th Army Science Conference (ASC), Orlando, Florida, 2010.
49. The influence of microstructure on neural tissue biomechanics
50. Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells make the human brain an isometrically scaled-up primate brain10.1002/cne.21974 ↗