Preparation and photoelectrochemical properties of TiO2/ZnO nanorod heterojunction arrays
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, a new process for preparing nanorod arrays was developed. The prepared nanorod array structure is innovative and the components of the prepared nanorod array can be replaced and expanded. The magnetron sputtering has been used to deposit the TiO2 and ZnO seed layer, which could promote the growth of nanorod arrays and is conducive to the improvement of the array morphology and structure, thereby enhancing the photovoltaic properties of the materials. The TiO2/ZnO nanorod array heterojunction materials were prepared using a secondary hydrothermal method combined with magnetron sputtering. The microscopic morphology, crystal structure, absorption spectrum, reflection spectrum, and photoelectrochemical performance of the samples were investigated using scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffractometry, UV–vis spectrophotometry, and electrochemical workstation, respectively. The experimental results show that the prepared TiO2/ZnO nanorod array heterojunctions exhibit a typical bilayer nanorod array structure with high crystallization; the TiO2/ZnO nanorod heterojunction array has a higher degradation efficiency with a 98% degradation rate of methylene blue (80 min), where there are only 84.5% and 89.6% of methylene blue degraded by the TiO2 and ZnO nanorod arrays, respectively. The photoelectrochemical properties and photocatalytic ability of the TiO2/ZnO nanorod array heterojunctions are significantly superior to those of the single-component ZnO or TiO2 nanorod arrays. SnO2/TiO2 nanorod heterojunction arrays and SnO2/ZnO nanorod heterojunction arrays were also prepared using this process, indicating promising application prospects.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Rani M, Keshu JY et al (2022) Chapter 19 - Environmental, legal, health, and safety issues of green nanomaterials. Green Functionalized Nanomater Environ Appl:567–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823137-1.00020-810.1016/B978-0-12-823137-1.00020-8 ↗
2. Raja MA, Ahmad MA, Daniyal M et al (2023) Chapter 21 - Management of wastewater and other environmental issues using smart nanomaterials. Adv Smart Nanomater Appl:489–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99546-7.00003-310.1016/B978-0-323-99546-7.00003-3 ↗
3. Mittal A, Brajpuriya R, Gupta R (2023) Solar steam generation using hybrid nanomaterials to address global environmental pollution and water shortage crisis. Mater Today Sustain 21:100319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2023.10031910.1016/j.mtsust.2023.100319 ↗
4. Al-Khalqi EM, Hamid MAA, Al-Hardan NH et al (2022) Magnesium-doped ZnO nanorod electrolyte-insulator-semiconductor (EIS) sensor for detecting calcium ions. J. Mater Sci - Mater Electron 33:1618–1630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022-07696-x10.1007/s10854-022-07696-x ↗
5. Cheng X, Zhang YJ, Bi YP (2019) Spatial dual-electric fields for highly enhanced the solar water splitting of TiO2 nanotube arrays. Nano Energy 57:542–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.07910.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.079 ↗
6. Pan BK, Gu JH, Xu XL et al (2021) Interface engineering of high performance all-inorganic perovskite solar cells via low-temperature processed TiO2 nanopillar arrays. Nano Res 14:3431–3438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-021-3566-x10.1007/s12274-021-3566-x ↗
7. Yang Y, Niu SW, Han DD et al (2017) Progress in developing metal oxide nanomaterials for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Adv Energy Mater 7:1700555. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20170055510.1002/aenm.201700555 ↗
8. Yao TT, An XR, Han HX et al (2018) Photoelectrocatalytic materials for solar water splitting. Adv Energy Mater 8:59–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20180021010.1002/aenm.201800210 ↗
9. Garnett E, Mai LQ, Yang PD (2019) Introduction: 1D nanomaterials/nanowires. Chem Rev 119:8955–8957. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0042310.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00423 ↗
10. Ruess R, Scarabino S, Ringleb A et al (2019) Diverging surface reactions at TiO2- or ZnO-based photoanodes in dye-sensitized solar cells. Phys Chem Chem Phys 21:13047–13057. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cp01215j10.1039/c9cp01215j ↗
11. Yildiz ZK, Erel S (2022) Dye-sensitized solar cells based on hybrid photoanodes consisting of ZnO nanorods embedded in TiO2 nanoparticles. J Electron Mater 51:6188–6195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-022-09865-410.1007/s11664-022-09865-4 ↗
12. Li W, Elzatahry A, Aldhayan D et al (2018) Core-shell structured titanium dioxide nanomaterials for solar energy utilization. Chem Soc Rev 47:8203–8237. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00443a10.1039/c8cs00443a ↗
13. Park J, Lee S, Lee TH et al (2022) Regulating the surface of anion-doped TiO2 nanorods by hydrogen annealing for superior photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Nano Convergence 9:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40580-022-00323-910.1186/s40580-022-00323-9 ↗
14. Guo R, Zeng D, Xie Y et al (2020) Carbon nitride quantum dots (CNQDs)/TiO2 nanoparticle heterojunction photocatalysts for enhanced ultraviolet-visible-light-driven bisphenol a degradation and H2 production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45:22534–22544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.09610.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.096 ↗
15. Chahrour KM, Yam FK, Eid AM et al (2020) Enhanced photoelectrochemical properties of hierarchical black TiO2-x nanolaces for Cr (VI) photocatalytic reduction. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45:22674–22690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.07810.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.078 ↗
16. Lin Y, Fang W, Xv R et al (2022) TiO2 nanoparticles modified with ZnIn2S4 nanosheets and Co-Pi groups: type II heterojunction and cocatalysts coexisted photoanode for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47:33361–33373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.21510.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.215 ↗
17. Wu C, Yin M, Zhang R et al (2020) Further studies of photodegradation and photocatalytic hydrogen production over Nafion-coated Pt/P25 sensitized by rhodamine B. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45:22700–22710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.09810.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.098 ↗
18. Al Abass N, Qahtan TF, Gondal MA et al (2020) Laser-assisted synthesis of ZnO/ZnSe hybrid nanostructured films for enhanced solar-light induced water splitting and water decontamination. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45:22938–22949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.19310.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.193 ↗
19. Ye C, Zhu ZD, Li XT et al (2022) ZIF-8 derived TiO2/ZnO heterostructure decorated with AgNPs as SERS sensor for sensitive identification of trace pesticides. J Alloys Compd 901:163675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16367510.1016/j.jallcom.2022.163675 ↗
20. Chen WX, Hu YJ, Peng P et al (2022) Multidimensional Ni-Co-sulfide heterojunction electrocatalyst for highly efficient overall water splitting. Sci China Mater 65:2421–2432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-021-1994-810.1007/s40843-021-1994-8 ↗
21. Haciefendioglu T, Balikoglu B, Aydin F et al (2022) Enhanced photocurrent in PbSe nanorod-quantum dot bulk nano-heterojunction solar cells. J Mater Sci - Mater Electron 33:714–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-07342-y10.1007/s10854-021-07342-y ↗
22. Liu YP, Zhang SY, He J et al (2019) Recent progress in the fabrication, properties, and devices of heterostructures based on 2D materials. Nano-Micro Lett 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-019-0245-510.1007/s40820-019-0245-5 ↗
23. Liu ZJ, Zhang FJ, Li CY et al (2021) Morphology and environmental applications of bismuth compound nano-photocatalytic materials: a review. Top Catal 64:780–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-021-01441-010.1007/s11244-021-01441-0 ↗
24. Saravanan A, Kumar PS, Vo DVN et al (2021) Photocatalysis for removal of environmental pollutants and fuel production: a review. Environ Chem Lett 19:441–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01077-810.1007/s10311-020-01077-8 ↗
25. Mousavi SB, Zeinali Heris S, Estellé P (2021) Viscosity, tribological and physicochemical features of ZnO and MoS2 diesel oil-based nanofluids: an experimental study. Fuel 293:120481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.12048110.1016/j.fuel.2021.120481 ↗
26. Sahoo P, Sharma A, Padhan S et al (2020) Visible light driven photosplitting of water using one dimensional Mg doped ZnO nanorod arrays. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45:22576–22588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.17310.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.173 ↗
27. Upadhyay GK, Rajput JK, Pathak TK et al (2019) Synthesis of ZnO:TiO2 nanocomposites for photocatalyst application in visible light. Vacuum 160:154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.11.02610.1016/j.vacuum.2018.11.026 ↗
28. Ma F, Ezawa M, Zhou Y (2015) Microwave field frequency and current density modulated skyrmion-chain in nanotrack. Sci Rep 5:15154. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1515410.1038/srep15154 ↗
29. Xu K, Liu Z, Qi SH et al (2020) Construction of Ag-modified TiO2/ZnO heterojunction nanotree arrays with superior photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical properties. Rsc Adv 10:34702–34711. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra06596j10.1039/d0ra06596j ↗
30. Zhou M, Wu BZ, Zhang XT et al (2020) Preparation and UV photoelectric properties of aligned ZnO-TiO2 and TiO2-ZnO core-shell structured heterojunction nanotubes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:38490–38498. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c0355010.1021/acsami.0c03550 ↗
31. Bai NN, Liu XC, Li ZG et al (2021) High-efficiency TiO2/ZnO nanocomposites photocatalysts by sol-gel and hydrothermal methods. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 99:92–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-021-05552-810.1007/s10971-021-05552-8 ↗
32. Katoch A, Kim JH, Kim SS (2014) TiO2/ZnO inner/outer double-layer hollow fibers for improved detection of reducing gases. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:21494–21499. https://doi.org/10.1021/am506499e10.1021/am506499e ↗
33. Boro B, Gogoi B, Rajbongshi BM et al (2018) Nano-structured TiO2/ZnO nanocomposite for dye-sensitized solar cells application: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:2264–2270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.03510.1016/j.rser.2017.06.035 ↗
34. Adesoye S, Dellinger K (2022) ZnO and TiO2 nanostructures for surface-enhanced Raman scattering-based bio-sensing: a review. Sens Bio-Sens Res 37:100499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsr.2022.10049910.1016/j.sbsr.2022.100499 ↗
35. Pavlenko M, Siuzdak K, Coy E et al (2020) Enhanced solar-driven water splitting of 1D core-shell Si/TiO2/ZnO nanopillars. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45:26426–26433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.23110.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.231 ↗
36. Hu A, Wang JY, Qu SH et al (2017) Hydrothermal growth of branched hierarchical TiO2 nanorod arrays for application in dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater Sci - Mater Electron 28:3415–3422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-5938-710.1007/s10854-016-5938-7 ↗
37. Rajaei P, Ranjbar M (2016) Synthesis and characterization of zinc oxide nanostructures by green capping agent and its photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue (MB). J. Mater Sci - Mater Electron 27:1708–1712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-015-3943-x10.1007/s10854-015-3943-x ↗
38. Pathania S, Hmar JJL, Verma B et al (2022) Titanium dioxide (TiO2) sensitized zinc oxide (ZnO)/conducting polymer nanocomposites for improving performance of hybrid flexible solar cells. J Electron Mater 51:5986–6001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-022-09815-010.1007/s11664-022-09815-0 ↗
39. Diedenhofen SL, Vecchi G, Algra RE et al (2009) Broad-band and omnidirectional antireflection coatings based on semiconductor nanorods. Adv Mater 21:973. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20080276710.1002/adma.200802767 ↗
40. Zhang S, Wang X, Hu J et al (2017) Design of two kinds of branched TiO2 nano array photoanodes and their comparison of photoelectrochemical performances. Electrochim Acta 252:368–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.16410.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.164 ↗
41. Chang CM, Hon MH, Leu IC (2013) Effect of seed layer on the growth and the consequent gas sensing characteristics of ZnO nanorod arrays using aqueous chemical growth. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 68:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-013-3126-210.1007/s10971-013-3126-2 ↗
42. Xu S, Wang ZL (2011) One-dimensional ZnO nanostructures: solution growth and functional properties. Nano Res 4:1013–1098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-011-0160-710.1007/s12274-011-0160-7 ↗
43. Tang D, Rettie AJE, Mabayoje O et al (2016) Facile growth of porous Fe2V4O13 films for photoelectrochemical water oxidation. J Mater Chem A 4:3034–3042. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta07877f10.1039/c5ta07877f ↗
44. Yus J, Ferrari B, Sanchez-Herencia AJ et al (2020) Understanding the effects of different microstructural contributions in the electrochemical response of nickel-based semiconductor electrodes with 3D hierarchical networks shapes. Electrochim Acta 335:135629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13562910.1016/j.electacta.2020.135629 ↗
45. Zhao K, Zhao SL, Gao C et al (2018) Metallic cobalt-carbon composite as recyclable and robust magnetic photocatalyst for efficient CO2 reduction. Small 14:1800762. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20180076210.1002/smll.201800762 ↗
46. Sun WT, Meng S, Zhang SJ et al (2018) Insight into the transfer mechanisms of photogenerated carriers for heterojunction photocatalysts with the analogous positions of valence band and conduction band: a case study of ZnO/TiO2. J Phys Chem C 122:15409–15420. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0375310.1021/acs.jpcc.8b03753 ↗
47. Gong Y, Fang N, Song X et al (2023) A self-assembled 2D nanosheet II-type heterojunction photocatalyst for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution[J]. Funct Mater Lett 16(03n04). https://doi.org/10.1142/S179360472351009810.1142/S1793604723510098 ↗
48. Wang Y, Zhong M, Chai L (2019) Effective control of the length of ZnO-TiO2 nanorod arrays as electron transport layer of perovskite solar cells with enhanced performance. Mater Sci Semicond Process 91:66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2018.10.03410.1016/j.mssp.2018.10.034 ↗
49. E. Sadat Behineh, A. Reza Solaimany Nazar, M. Farhadian et al., Embedded ZnO nanorod array/TiO2/GO coated optical fiber in a photocatalytic microreactor for Cefixime degradation: Diffused or focused light sources effect. J Ind Eng Chem (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2023.10.01610.1016/j.jiec.2023.10.016 ↗
50. Outili N, Kerras H, Meniai AH (2023) Recent conventional and non-conventional WCO pretreatment methods: implementation of green chemistry principles and metrics. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 41:100794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2023.10079410.1016/j.cogsc.2023.100794 ↗
51. Pellengahr F, Ghannadzadeh A, van der Meer Y (2023) How accurate is plastic end-of-life modeling in LCA? Investigating the main assumptions and deviations for the end-of-life management of plastic packaging. Sustain Prod Consumption 42:170–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.09.01410.1016/j.spc.2023.09.014 ↗
52. Lyu L, Bagchi M, Markoglou N et al (2024) Towards environmentally sustainable management: a review on the generation, degradation, and recycling of polypropylene face mask waste. J Hazard Mater 461:132566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.13256610.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132566 ↗
53. Samani P (2023) Synergies and gaps between circularity assessment and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Sci Total Environ 903:166611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.16661110.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166611 ↗
54. Biagetti E, Gislon G, Martella A et al (2023) Comparison of the use of life cycle assessment and ecological footprint methods for evaluating environmental performances in dairy production. Sci Total Environ 905:166845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.16684510.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166845 ↗
55. Farjana SH, Tokede O, Tao Z et al (2023) Life cycle assessment of end-of-life engineered wood. Sci Total Environ 887:164018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.16401810.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164018 ↗
56. Cheng X, Jin J, Shi M et al (2023) Facile synthesis of large-scale TiO2 nanorod arrays decorated with Ag nanoparticles as sensitive 3D SERS substrates. Mater Today Commun 35:106088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10608810.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106088 ↗
57. Olabi AG, Wilberforce T, Elsaid K et al (2021) Recent progress on carbon-based nanomaterial for phase change materials: prospects and challenges. 100920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2021.10092010.1016/j.tsep.2021.100920 ↗
58. Iravani SJCI (2022) MXenes and MXene-based (nano)structures: a perspective on greener synthesis and biomedical prospects. 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.13710.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.137 ↗
59. Gkikas G, Douka DD, Barkoula NM et al (2015) Nano-enhanced composite materials under thermal shock and environmental degradation: a durability study. 70:206–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.00810.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.008 ↗