journal article·2015-04

Growth stimulation of Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas putida using nanostructured ZnO thin film as transducer element

Alexandre Loukanov, Chavdar Filipov, Violeta Valcheva, Marta Lecheva, Saim Emin

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 17· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

The semiconductor zinc oxide nanomaterial (ZnO or ZnO:H) is widely used in advanced biosensor technology for the design of highly-sensitive detector elements for various applications. In the attempt to evaluate its effect on common microorganisms, two types of nanostructured transducer films have been used (average diameter 600–1000 nm). They have been prepared by using both wet sol–gel method and magnetron sputtering. Their polycrystalline structure and specific surface features have been analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope, and atomic force microscope. The assessment of growth stimulation of bacteria was determined using epifluorescent microscope by cell staining with Live/Dead BacLight kit. In our experiments, the growth stimulation of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria on nanostructured ZnO film is demonstrated by Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas putida. These two bacterial species have been selected, because they are well known and studied in biosensor technologies, with structural difference of their cell walls. These pathogens are easy for with common source in the liquid food or some commercial products. Our data has revealed that the method of transducer film preparation influences strongly bacterial inhibition and division. These results present the transforming signal precisely, when ZnO is used in biosensor applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Biosensors and Analytical Detection · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Berney M, Hammes F, Bosshard F, Weilenmann HU, Egli T (2007) Assessment and interpretation of bacterial viability by using the Live/Dead BacLight kit in combination with flow cytometry. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(19):3283–329010.1128/AEM.02750-06 ↗
2. Bong C W, Malfatti F, Azam F, Obayashi Y, Suzuki S (2010) The effect of zinc exposure on the bacteria abundance and proteolytic activity in seawater. In: Interdisciplinary studies on environmental chemistry—biological responses to contaminants. Terrapub, Tokyo, pp 57–63
3. Brayner R, Ferrari-Iliou R, Brivois N, Djediat S, Benedetti MF, Fievet F (2006) Toxicological impact studies based in Escherichia coli bacteria in ultrafine ZnO nanoparticles colloidal medium. Nano Lett 6(4):866–87010.1021/nl052326h ↗
4. Dimova-Malinovska D (2011) Nanostructured ZnO thin films: properties and applications. In: Reithmaier JP, Paunovic P, Kulisch W, Popov C, Petkov P (eds) Nanotechnological basis for advanced sensors. NATO science for peace and security series B: physics and biophysics. Springer, Netherlands, pp 157–16610.1007/978-94-007-0903-4_16 ↗
5. Emami-Karvani Z, Chehrazi P (2011) Antibacterial activity of ZnO on gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Afr J Microbiol Res 5(12):1368–1373
6. Franklin N, Rogers N, Apte SC, Batley GE, Gadd GE, Casey PS (2007) Comparative toxicity of nanoparticulate ZnO, bulk ZnO, and ZnCl2 to a freshwater microalga (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata): the importance of particle solubility. Environ Sci Technol 41:8484–849010.1021/es071445r ↗
7. Greist HT, Hingorani SK, Kelley K, Goswami DY (2002) Using scanning electron microscopy to visualize photocatalytic mineralization of airborne microorganisms. In: Proceedings of the indoor air 2002, 9th international conference on indoor air quality and climate, July 2002, Monterey, California, pp 712–717
8. Gu BX, Xu CX, Zhu GP, Liu SQ, Chen LY, Li XS (2009) Tyrosinase immobilization on ZnO nanorods for phenol detection. J Phys Chem B 113:377–38110.1021/jp808001c ↗
9. Hirota K, Sugimoto M, Kato M, Tsukagoshi K, Tanigawa T, Sugimoto H (2010) Preparation of zinc oxide ceramics with a sustainable antibacterial activity under dark conditions. Ceram Int 36(2):497–50610.1016/j.ceramint.2009.09.026 ↗
10. Jin T, Sun D, Su JY, Zhang H, Sue HJ (2009) Antimicrobial efficacy of zinc oxide quantum dots against Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Enteritidis, and Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Food Sci 74(1):46–5210.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.01013.x ↗
11. Kaneva NV, Dushkin CD (2011) Preparation of nanocrystalline thin films of ZnO by sol-gel dip coating. Bul Chem Commun 43(2):259–263
12. Lewis CL, Craig CC, Senecal AG (2014) Mass and density measurements of live and dead gram-negative and gram-positive bacterial populations. Appl Environ Microbiol 80(12):3622–363110.1128/AEM.00117-14 ↗
13. Liu Z, Liu Y, Yang H, Yang Y, Shen G, Yu R (2005) A mediator-free tyrosinase based on ZnO sol-gel matrix. Electroanalysis 17(12):1065–107010.1002/elan.200403215 ↗
14. Liu J, Guo C, Li CM, Li Y, Chi Q, Huang X, Liao L, Yu T (2009a) carbon-decorated zno nanowire array: a novel platform for direct electrochemistry of enzymes and biosensing applications. Electrochem Commun 11(1):202–20510.1016/j.elecom.2008.11.009 ↗
15. Liu X, Hu Q, Wu Q, Zhang W, Fang Z, Xie Q (2009b) Aligned ZnO nanorods: a useful film to fabricate amperometric glucose biosensor. Colloids Surf B 74(1):154–15810.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.07.011 ↗
16. Norton DP, Heo YW, Ivill MP, Ip K, Pearton SJ, Chisholm MF, Steiner T (2004) ZnO: growth, doping & processing. Mater Today 7(6):34–4010.1016/S1369-7021(04)00287-1 ↗
17. Pal S, Ying W, Alocilja EC, Downes FP (2008) Sensitivity and specificity performance of a direct-charge transfer biosensor for detecting Bacillus cereus in selected food matrices. Biosyst Eng 99:461–46810.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.11.015 ↗
18. Park CW, Yoon KY, Byeon JH, Kim K, Hwang J (2012) Development of rapid assessment method to determine bacterial viability based on ultraviolet and visible (UV–Vis) spectroscopy analysis including application to bioaerosols. Aerosol Air Qual Res 12:399–40810.4209/aaqr.2011.08.0129 ↗
19. Raghupathi KR, Koodali RT, Manna AC (2011) Size-dependent bacterial growth inhibition and mechanism of antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Langmuir 27:4020–402810.1021/la104825u ↗
20. Rajesh Kumar B, Subba Rao T (2011) Effect of substrate temperature on structural properties of nanostructured zinc oxide thin films prepared by reactive DC magnetron sputtering. Dig J Nanomater Biostruct 6(3):1281–1287
21. Reyes PI, Duan Z, Lu Y, Khavulya D, Boustany N (2013) ZnO nanostructure-modified QCM for dynamic monitoring of cell adhesion and proliferation. Biosens Bioelectron 41:84–8910.1016/j.bios.2012.07.039 ↗
22. Romney M, Sherlock C, Stephens G, Clarke A (2000) Pseudo-outbreak of Pseudomonas putida in a hospital outpatient clinic originating from a contaminated commercial anti-fog solution. Can Commun Dis Rep 26(21):183–184
23. Sawai J (2003) Quantitative evaluation of antibacterial activities of metallic oxide powders (ZnO, MgO and CaO) by conductimetric assay. J Microbiol Methods 54:177–18210.1016/S0167-7012(03)00037-X ↗
24. Sawai J, Yoshikawa T (2004) Quantitative evaluation of antifungal activity of metallic oxide powders (MgO, CaO and ZnO) by an indirect conductimetric assay. J Appl Microbiol 96(4):803–80910.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02234.x ↗
25. Sun XW, Kwok HS (1999) Optical properties of epitaxially grown zinc oxide nanoporous thin film. Appl Phys Lett 91:1–3
26. Zhang F, Wang X, Ai S, Sun Z, Wan Q, Zhu Z, Xian Y, Jin L, Yamamoto J (2004) Immobilization of uricase on ZnO nanorods for a reagentless uric acid biosensors. Anal Chim Acta 519(2):155–16010.1016/j.aca.2004.05.070 ↗