Tailoring band gap and light absorption in M-TiNT (M = Cu2+, Ni2+, Co2+, and Fe3+) for water remediation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Growing environmental concerns and the persistence of organic pollutants underscore the urgent need for effective wastewater treatment. Among the various strategies developed to address this challenge, photocatalysis has emerged as a promising approach due to its potential for sustainable and efficient degradation of pollutants. In this study, we investigate the simultaneous incorporation of transition metal cations (Cu 2 ⁺, Ni 2 ⁺, Co 2 ⁺, and Fe 3 ⁺) into the crystalline structure of titanate nanotubes (H₂Ti₃O₇, TiNT) via a straightforward ion-exchange method. This modification promotes the formation of a p-n heterostructure between TiNT and the corresponding metal oxides (CuO, NiO, CoO, and Fe₂O₃). Remarkably, metal cation incorporation leads to a substantial reduction in the band gap, from 3.3 eV to 1.5 eV, and induces a new absorption feature associated with the formation of p-n heterojunctions. These modifications effectively extend the light absorption of the materials into the visible region. Furthermore, the formation of the p-n heterojunction increased charge carrier density compared to that obtained in pristine TiNT. The photocatalytic activity of the resulting metal-doped TiNT (M-TiNT) semiconductors was evaluated for the degradation of ibuprofen and indigo carmine under both UV and visible light irradiation. The enhanced photocatalytic performance is attributed to improved light harvesting and increased availability of charge carriers, facilitating the generation of reactive redox species. The importance of the hydroxyl radical as a reactive species was confirmed using a hydroxyl radical scavenger, which led to a significant reduction in photocatalytic activity compared to the control experiment without the scavenger. Notably, Cu–TiNT remained stable after the reuse cycles, retaining 90% of its initial photoactivity. These findings provide valuable insights for the rational design of nanostructured photocatalysts and underscore the potential of metal-doped TiNTs for efficient environmental remediation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Lapworth DJ, Baran N, Stuart ME, Ward RS (2012) Emerging organic contaminants in groundwater: a review of sources, fate and occurrence. Environ Pollut 163:287–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.12.03410.1016/j.envpol.2011.12.034 ↗
2. Ternes T, Joss A, Oehlmann J (2015) Occurrence, fate, removal and assessment of emerging contaminants in water in the water cycle (from wastewater to drinking water). Water Res 72:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.05510.1016/j.watres.2015.02.055 ↗
3. Li Y, Zhu G, Jern W, Keat S (2014) Science of the total environment a review on removing pharmaceutical contaminants from wastewater by constructed wetlands : design, performance and mechanism. Sci Total Environ 468–469:908–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.01810.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.018 ↗
4. Gavrilescu M, Demnerová K, Aamand J, Agathos S, Fava F (2015) Emerging pollutants in the environment: present and future challenges in biomonitoring, ecological risks and bioremediation. N Biotechnol 32:147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2014.01.00110.1016/j.nbt.2014.01.001 ↗
5. Santos LHMLM, Araújo AN, Fachini A, Pena A, Delerue-Matos C, Montenegro MCBSM (2010) Ecotoxicological aspects related to the presence of pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment. J Hazard Mater 175:45–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.10010.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.100 ↗
6. Vautier M, Guillard C, Herrmann JM (2001) Photocatalytic degradation of dyes in water: case study of indigo and of indigo carmine. J Catal 201:46–59. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.2001.323210.1006/jcat.2001.3232 ↗
7. Chowdhury MF, Khandaker S, Sarker F, Islam A, Rahman MT, Awual MR (2020) Current treatment technologies and mechanisms for removal of indigo carmine dyes from wastewater: a review. J Mol Liq 318:114061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.11406110.1016/j.molliq.2020.114061 ↗
8. Caprarescu S, Miron AR, Purcar V, Radu AL, Sarbu A, Ion-Ebrasu D, Atanase LI, Ghiurea M (2016) Efficient removal of Indigo Carmine dye by a separation process. Water Sci Technol 74:2462–2473. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.38810.2166/wst.2016.388 ↗
9. Valencia GK, Hernández-Gordillo A, Méndez-Galván M, Morett D, Rodil SE (2022) Hydrazine modified g-C3N4 with enhanced photocatalytic activity for degradation of indigo carmine. Mater Sci Semicond Process 150:106900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2022.10690010.1016/j.mssp.2022.106900 ↗
10. Choina J, Kosslick H, Fischer C, Flechsig GU, Frunza L, Schulz A (2013) Photocatalytic decomposition of pharmaceutical ibuprofen pollutions in water over titania catalyst. Appl Catal B 129:589–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.09.05310.1016/j.apcatb.2012.09.053 ↗
11. Ruggeri G, Ghigo G, Maurino V, Minero C, Vione D (2013) Photochemical transformation of ibuprofen into harmful 4-isobutylacetophenone: pathways, kinetics, and significance for surface waters. Water Res 47:6109–6121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.03110.1016/j.watres.2013.07.031 ↗
12. Ammar SH, Abdulmajeed YR, Khadim HJ, Jabbar ZH, Khudhair EM (2024) Rational assembly of Z-scheme FeTiO3/Fe-doped g-C3N4 photocatalytic heterojunctions: photodegradation behavior and mechanism insight. J Water Process Eng 61:105275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.10527510.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105275 ↗
13. Jiad MM, Abbar AH, Jabbar ZH (2025) Advanced treatment of petroleum refinery wastewater by electro-Fenton and photo-catalytic processes. Environ Technol Rev 14:400–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622515.2025.247971310.1080/21622515.2025.2479713 ↗
14. Ibhadon AO, Fitzpatrick P (2013) Heterogeneous photocatalysis: recent advances and applications. Catalysts. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal301018910.3390/catal3010189 ↗
15. Prihod′ko RV, Soboleva NM (2013) Photocatalysis: oxidative processes in water treatment. J Chem. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/16870110.1155/2013/168701 ↗
16. Saeed M, Muneer M, Haq A, Akram N (2022) Photocatalysis: an effective tool for photodegradation of dyes—a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 29(1):293–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16389-710.1007/s11356-021-16389-7 ↗
17. Fujishima A, Zhang XTD (2007) Heterogeneous photocatalysis: from water photolysis to applications in environmental cleanup. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32:2664–2672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.09.00910.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.09.009 ↗
18. Tang Y, Jiang Z, Tay Q, Deng J, Lai Y, Gong D, Dong Z, Chen Z (2012) Visible-light plasmonic photocatalyst anchored on titanate nanotubes: a novel nanohybrid with synergistic effects of adsorption and degradation. RSC Adv 2:9406–9414. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ra21300a10.1039/c2ra21300a ↗
19. Lei X, Li X, Ruan Z, Zhang T, Pan F, Li Q, Xia D, Fu J (2018) Adsorption-photocatalytic degradation of dye pollutant in water by graphite oxide grafted titanate nanotubes. J Mol Liq 266:122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.06.05310.1016/j.molliq.2018.06.053 ↗
20. Zhao W, Wang X, Sang H, Wang K (2013) Synthesis of Bi-doped TiO2 nanotubes and enhanced photocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution from glycerol solution. Chin J Chem 31:415–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjoc.20120115110.1002/cjoc.201201151 ↗
21. Giri RR, Ozaki H, Ota S, Takanami R, Taniguchi S (2010) Degradation of common pharmaceuticals and personal care products in mixed solutions by advanced oxidation techniques. Int J Environ Sci Tech 7:251–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0332613510.1007/BF03326135 ↗
22. Ji H, Du P, Zhao D, Li S, Sun F, Duin EC, Liu W (2020) 2D/1D graphitic carbon nitride/titanate nanotubes heterostructure for efficient photocatalysis of sulfamethazine under solar light: catalytic “hot spots” at the rutile–anatase–titanate interfaces. Appl Catal B 263:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.11835710.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118357 ↗
23. Durán-Álvarez JC, Méndez-Galván M, Lartundo-Rojas L, Rodríguez-Varela M, Ramírez-Ortega D, Guerrero-Araque D, Zanella R (2019) Synthesis and characterization of the all solid Z-scheme Bi2WO6/Ag/AgBr for the photocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin in water. Top Catal 62:1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-019-01190-110.1007/s11244-019-01190-1 ↗
24. Ammar SH, Mohammed ISh, Abdulkader HD, Jabbar ZH, Kadhim DJ (2025) ZIF-67/C-doped TiO2 heterojunctions for prompted photocatalytic decomposition of emerging pollutants. Mater Lett 395:138681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2025.13868110.1016/j.matlet.2025.138681 ↗
25. Bard AJ (1979) Photoelectrochemistry and heterogeneous photo-catalysis at semiconductors. J Photochem 10:59–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2670(79)80037-410.1016/0047-2670(79)80037-4 ↗
26. Zhang YJ, Wang YC, Yan W, Li T, Li S, Hu YR (2009) Synthesis of Cr 2 O 3 /TNTs nanocomposite and its photocatalytic hydrogen generation under visible light irradiation. Appl Surf Sci 255:9508–9511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.07.08010.1016/j.apsusc.2009.07.080 ↗
27. Haider Z, Kang YS (2014) Facile preparation of hierarchical TiO2 nano structures: growth mechanism and enhanced photocatalytic H2 production from water splitting using methanol as a sacrificial reagent. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:10342–10352. https://doi.org/10.1021/am501796m10.1021/am501796m ↗
28. Lucas TTA, Melo MA, Freitas ALM, Souza FL, Gonçalves RV (2020) Enhancing the solar water splitting activity of TiO2 nanotube-array photoanode by surface coating with La-doped SrTiO3. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 208:110428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2020.11042810.1016/j.solmat.2020.110428 ↗
29. Dong P, Liu B, Wang Y, Guo L, Huang Y, Yin S (2011) A study on the H2Ti3O7sheet-like products during the formation process of titanate nanotubes. J Electrochem Soc 158:183–186. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.361040610.1149/1.3610406 ↗
30. Liu SS, Lee CK, Chen HC, Wang CC, Juang LC (2009) Application of titanate nanotubes for Cu(II) ions adsorptive removal from aqueous solution. Chem Eng J 147:188–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.06.03410.1016/j.cej.2008.06.034 ↗
31. Li C, Yuan J, Han B, Jiang L, Shangguan W (2010) TiO2 nanotubes incorporated with CdS for photocatalytic hydrogen production from splitting water under visible light irradiation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:7073–7079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.01.00810.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.01.008 ↗
32. Yu J, Yu H, Cheng B, Trapalis C (2006) Effects of calcination temperature on the microstructures and photocatalytic activity of titanate nanotubes. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 249:135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2006.01.00310.1016/j.molcata.2006.01.003 ↗
33. Ou HH, Lo SL, Liao CH (2011) N-doped TiO2 prepared from microwave-assisted titanate nanotubes (NaxH2- xTi3O7): the effect of microwave irradiation during tnt synthesis on the visible light photoactivity of N-Doped TiO2. J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces 115:4000–4007. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp107600510.1021/jp1076005 ↗
34. Liu W, Wang T, Borthwick AGL, Wang Y, Yin X, Li X, Ni J (2013) Adsorption of Pb 2+, Cd 2+, Cu 2+ and Cr 3+ onto titanate nanotubes: competition and effect of inorganic ions. Sci Total Environ 456:171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.08210.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.082 ↗
35. Doong RA, Liao CY (2017) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of Cu-deposited N-TiO2/titanate nanotubes under UV and visible light irradiations. Separat Purificat Technol 31(179):403–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.02.02810.1016/j.seppur.2017.02.028 ↗
36. Mahmoud MS, Ahmed E, Farghali AA, Zaki AH, Abdelghani EAM, Barakat NAM (2018) Influence of Mn, Cu, and Cd–doping for titanium oxide nanotubes on the photocatalytic activity toward water splitting under visible light irradiation. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 554:100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.06.03910.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.06.039 ↗
37. Szirmai P, Stevens J, Horváth E, Ćirić L, Kollár M, Forró L, Náfrádi B (2017) Competitive ion-exchange of manganese and gadolinium in titanate nanotubes. Catal Today 284:146–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2016.11.01010.1016/j.cattod.2016.11.010 ↗
38. Wu L, Yang X, Li J, Huang Y, Li X (2017) Fabrication of titanium dioxide nanotubes with good morphology at high calcination temperature and their photocatalytic activity. Mater Chem Phys 202:136–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.09.02210.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.09.022 ↗
39. Sreekantan S, Wei LC (2010) Study on the formation and photocatalytic activity of titanate nanotubes synthesized via hydrothermal method. J Alloys Compd 490:436–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.03010.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.030 ↗
40. Doong R, Chang S, Tsai C (2013) Enhanced photoactivity of Cu-deposited titanate nanotubes for removal of bisphenol a. Appl Catal B 129:48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.09.01110.1016/j.apcatb.2012.09.011 ↗
41. Lara-García HA, Mendoza-Nieto JA, Pfeiffer H, Torrente-Murciano L (2019) COx-free hydrogen production from ammonia on novel cobalt catalysts supported on 1D titanate nanotubes. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44:30062–30074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.12010.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.120 ↗
42. Camposeco R, Castillo S, Rodriguez-González V, Hinojosa-Reyes M, Medina-Álvares MI, Mejía-Centeno I (2018) Promotional effect of Rh nanoparticles on WO3/TiO2 titanate nanotube photocatalysts for boosted hydrogen production. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 353:114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.11.01410.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.11.014 ↗
43. Xue J, Long L, Zhang L, Luo H, Yang L, Liu F, Lv F, Kong W, Liu J (2020) Enhanced H2 evolution and the interfacial electron transfer mechanism of titanate nanotube sensitized with CdS quantum dots and graphene quantum dots. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45:6476–6486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.19610.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.196 ↗
44. Ji H, Ni J, Zhao D, Liu W (2022) Application of titanate nanotubes for photocatalytic decontamination in water: challenges and prospects. ACS ES&T Eng 2:1015–1038. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.1c0045110.1021/acsestengg.1c00451 ↗
45. Wong CL, Tan YN, Mohamed AR (2011) A review on the formation of titania nanotube photocatalysts by hydrothermal treatment. J Environ Manage 92:1669–1680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.00610.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.006 ↗
46. Liu N, Chen X, Zhang J, Schwank JW (2014) A review on TiO2-based nanotubes synthesized via hydrothermal method: formation mechanism, structure modification, and photocatalytic applications. Catal Today 225:34–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.10.09010.1016/j.cattod.2013.10.090 ↗
47. Méndez-Galván M, Celaya CA, Jaramillo-Quintero OA, Muñiz J, Díaz G, Lara-García HA (2021) Tuning the band gap of M-doped titanate nanotubes (M = Fe Co, Ni, and Cu): an experimental and theoretical study. Nanoscale Adv 3:1382–1391. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NA00932F10.1039/D0NA00932F ↗
48. Iani IM, Teodoro V, Marana NL, Coleto U Jr, Sambrano JR, Simões AZ, Teodoro MD, Longo E, Perazolli LA, Amoresi RA, Zaghete MA (2021) Cation-exchange mediated synthesis of hydrogen and sodium titanates heterojunction: Theoretical and experimental insights toward photocatalyic mechanism. Appl Surf Sci 1(538):148137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14813710.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148137 ↗
49. Wang W, Mei S, Jiang H, Wang L, Tang H, Liu Q (2023) Recent advances in TiO2-based S-scheme heterojunction photocatalysts. Chin J Catal 55:137–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(23)64551-610.1016/S1872-2067(23)64551-6 ↗
50. Sboui M, Hussein MA, Alamry KA, Al-Ghamdi YO, Gan H, Ji Z, Swaminathan M, Zhang K, Li Z, Yao Z, Bahnemann DW, Hong Pan J (2025) Cu2O/H2Ti3O7/Cellulose biohybrid film with efficient photocatalytic and antibacterial activities in solar-driven environmental decontamination. Chem Eng Sci 302:120902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2024.12090210.1016/j.ces.2024.120902 ↗
51. Chen X, Sun B, Chu J, Han Z, Wang Y, Du Y, Han X, Xu P (2022) Oxygen vacancy-induced construction of CoO/h-TiO 2 z-scheme heterostructures for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 14:28945–28955. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c0662210.1021/acsami.2c06622 ↗
52. Zhang W, Zhu J, He J, Xu L, Hu L (2020) Construction of NiO/H2Ti3O7 nanotube composite and its photocatalytic conversion feature for ethyl mercaptan. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 126:630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-03815-910.1007/s00339-020-03815-9 ↗
53. Wahyuningsih S, Ramelan AH, Purwanti PD, Munawaroh H, Ichsan S, Kristiawan YR (2018) The influence of NiO addition in TiO2 structure and its photoactivity. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/333/1/01203210.1088/1757-899X/333/1/012032 ↗
54. Ku Y, Lin CN, Hou WM (2011) Characterization of coupled NiO/TiO2 photocatalyst for the photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) in aqueous solution. J Mol Catal A Chem 349:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2011.08.00610.1016/j.molcata.2011.08.006 ↗
55. Li D, Li J, Qin L, Hu Y, Gong T, Zhang W, Hui L, Feng H (2021) H-titanate nanotube supported Fe2O3 nanoparticles for enhancing the thermal decomposition of ammonium perchlorate: the superb catalytic activity of interface sites. Appl Surf Sci 563:150207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.15020710.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150207 ↗
56. Korzhavyi PA, Johansson B (2011) Literature review on the properties of cuprous oxide Cu₂O and the process of copper oxidation (SKB TR-11-08). Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB
57. Gawande MB, Goswami A, Felpin FX, Asefa T, Huang X, Silva R, Zou X, Zboril R, Varma RS (2016) Cu and Cu-based nanoparticles: synthesis and applications in catalysis. Chem Rev 116:3722–3811. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0048210.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00482 ↗
58. Sharma A, Lee B (2016) Rapid photo-degradation of 2-chlorophenol under visible light irradiation using cobalt oxide-loaded TiO 2 / reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite from aqueous media. J Environ Manage 165:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.01310.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.013 ↗
59. Ou HH, Hoffmann MR, Liao CH, Hong JH, Lo SL (2010) Photocatalytic oxidation of aqueous ammonia over platinized microwave-assisted titanate nanotubes. Appl Catal B 99:74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.06.00210.1016/j.apcatb.2010.06.002 ↗
60. Bavykin DV, Lapkin AA, Plucinski PK, Torrente-Murciano L, Friedrich JM, Walsh FC (2006) Deposition of Pt, Pd, Ru and Au on the surfaces of titanate nanotubes. Top Catal 39:151–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-006-0051-410.1007/s11244-006-0051-4 ↗
61. Zhao X, Cai Z, Wang T, O’Reilly SE, Liu W, Zhao D (2016) A new type of cobalt-deposited titanate nanotubes for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of phenanthrene. Appl Catal B 187:134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.01.01010.1016/j.apcatb.2016.01.010 ↗
62. Wang LS, Xiao MW, Huang XJ, Wu YD (2009) Synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic activities of titanate nanotubes surface-decorated by zinc oxide nanoparticles. J Hazard Mater 161:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.08010.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.080 ↗
63. Doong RA, Tsai CW, Liao CI (2012) Coupled removal of bisphenol a and copper ion by titanate nanotubes fabricated at different calcination temperatures. Sep Purif Technol 91:81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.10.03410.1016/j.seppur.2011.10.034 ↗
64. Ferreira VC, Nunes MR, Silvestre AJ, Monteiro OC (2013) Synthesis and properties of Co-doped titanate nanotubes and their optical sensitization with methylene blue. Mater Chem Phys 142:355–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.07.02910.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.07.029 ↗
65. Barrocas B, Silvestre AJ, Rolo AG, Monteiro OC (2016) The effect of ionic Co presence on the structural, optical and photocatalytic properties of modified cobalt-titanate nanotubes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:18081–18093. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cp01889k10.1039/c6cp01889k ↗
66. Liu W, Zhao X, Borthwick AGL, Wang Y, Ni J (2015) Dual-enhanced photocatalytic activity of Fe-deposited titanate nanotubes used for simultaneous removal of As(III) and As(V). ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:19726–19735. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0526310.1021/acsami.5b05263 ↗
67. Celaya CA, Méndez-Galván M, Castro-Ocampo O, Torres-Martínez LM, Luévano-Hipólito E, Díaz de León JN, Lara-García HA, Díaz G, Muñiz J (2022) Exploring the CO2 conversion into hydrocarbons v i a a photocatalytic process onto M-doped titanate nanotubes (M = Ni and Cu). Fuel 324:124440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.12444010.1016/j.fuel.2022.124440 ↗
68. Doebelin N, Kleeberg R (2015) Profex: a graphical user interface for the Rietveld refinement program BGMN. J Appl Crystallogr 48:1573–1580. https://doi.org/10.1107/S160057671501468510.1107/S1600576715014685 ↗
69. Huang J, Jiang Y, Li G, Xue C, Guo W (2017) Hetero-structural NiTiO3/TiO2 nanotubes for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Renew Energy 111:410–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.02410.1016/j.renene.2017.04.024 ↗
70. López R, Gómez R (2012) Band-gap energy estimation from diffuse reflectance measurements on sol-gel and commercial TiO 2: a comparative study. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 61:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-011-2582-910.1007/s10971-011-2582-9 ↗
71. Kunadian I, Lipka SM, Swartz CR, Qian D, Andrews R (2009) Determination of carrier densities of Boron- and Nitrogen-doped multiwalled carbon nanotubes using Mott-Schottky plots. J Electrochem Soc 156:K110. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.311103210.1149/1.3111032 ↗
72. Roy P, Berger S, Schmuki P (2011) TiO2 nanotubes: synthesis and applications. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:2904–2939. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20100137410.1002/anie.201001374 ↗
73. Ge M, Li Q, Cao C, Huang J, Li S, Zhang S, Chen Z, Zhang K, Al-Deyab SS, Lai Y (2017) One-dimensional TiO2 nanotube photocatalysts for solar water splitting. Adv Sci 4:1–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20160015210.1002/advs.201600152 ↗
74. Sood S, Umar A, Kumar Mehta S, Kumar Kansal S (2015) Α-Bi2O3 nanorods: an efficient sunlight active photocatalyst for degradation of Rhodamine B and 2,4,6-trichlorophenol. Ceram Int 41:3355–3364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.10.03810.1016/j.ceramint.2014.10.038 ↗
75. Méndez-Galván M, Valencia GK, Lara-García HA, Hernández-Gordillo A, Rodil SE, Díaz G (2025) Enhancing photocatalytic hydrogen production: the impact of copper loading on Cu-doped TiNT and CuO/TiNT heterostructures. Fuel 396:135353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.13535310.1016/j.fuel.2025.135353 ↗
76. Lee Y, Chueh Y, Hsieh C, Chang M-T, Chou L, Wang ZL, Lan Y-W, Chen C, Kurata H, Isoda S (2007) P-type α-Fe2O3 nanowires and their n-type transition in a reductive ambient. Small 3:1356–1361. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20070000410.1002/smll.200700004 ↗
77. Mahmoud MS, Ahmed E, Farghali AA, Zaki AH, Barakat NAM (2018) Synthesis of Fe/Co-doped titanate nanotube as redox catalyst for photon-induced water splitting. Mater Chem Phys 217:125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.06.05810.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.06.058 ↗
78. Tang ZR, Zhang Y, Xu YJ (2012) Tuning the optical property and photocatalytic performance of titanate nanotube toward selective oxidation of alcohols under ambient conditions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:1512–1520. https://doi.org/10.1021/am300185210.1021/am3001852 ↗
79. Cho G, Park Y, Hong YK, Ha DH (2019) Ion exchange: an advanced synthetic method for complex nanoparticles. Nano Convergence. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40580-019-0187-010.1186/s40580-019-0187-0 ↗
80. Bavykin DV, Walsh FC (2009) Titanate and titania nanotubes: synthesis, properties and applications. Nanoscience & Nanotechnology Series. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge p 176. https://doi.org/10.1039/978184973077810.1039/9781849730778 ↗
81. Xu W, Wang H, Zhou X, Zhu T (2014) CuO/TiO2 catalysts for gas-phase Hg0 catalytic oxidation. Chem Eng J 243:380–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.12.01410.1016/j.cej.2013.12.014 ↗
82. Morales J, Espinos JP, Caballero A, Gonzalez-Elipe AR, Mejias JA (2005) XPS study of interface and ligand effects in supported Cu2O and CuO nanometric particles. J Phys Chem B 109:7758–7765. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp045305510.1021/jp0453055 ↗
83. Sakamoto K, Hayashi F, Sato K, Hirano M, Ohtsu N (2020) XPS spectral analysis for a multiple oxide comprising NiO, TiO2, and NiTiO3. Appl Surf Sci 526:146729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14672910.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146729 ↗
84. Espinós JP, Morales J, Barranco A, Caballero A, Holgado JP, González-Elipe AR (2002) Interface effects for Cu, CuO, and Cu2O deposited on SiO2 and ZrO2. XPS determination of the valence state of copper in Cu/SiO2 and Cu/ZrO2 catalysts. J Phys Chem B 106:6921–6929. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp014618m10.1021/jp014618m ↗
85. De La Peña O’Shea VA, Consuelo Álvarez Galván M, Platero Prats AE, Campos-Martin JM, Fierro JLG (2011) Direct evidence of the SMSI decoration effect: the case of Co/TiO2 catalyst. Chem Commun 47:7131–7133. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cc10318k10.1039/c1cc10318k ↗
86. Biesinger MC, Payne BP, Grosvenor AP, Lau LWM, Gerson AR, Smart RSC (2011) Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl Surf Sci 257:2717–2730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.05110.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.051 ↗
87. Lara-García HA, Araiza DG, Méndez-Galván M, Tehuacanero-Cuapa S, Gómez-Cortés A, Díaz G (2020) Dry reforming of methane over nickel supported on Nd-ceria: enhancement of the catalytic properties and coke resistance. RSC Adv 10:33059–33070. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra05761d10.1039/d0ra05761d ↗
88. Muniyappan S, Solaiyammal T, Sudhakar K, Karthigeyan A, Murugakoothan P (2017) Conventional hydrothermal synthesis of titanate nanotubes: systematic discussions on structural, optical, thermal and morphological properties. Modern Electronic Mater 3:174–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.moem.2017.10.00210.1016/j.moem.2017.10.002 ↗
89. Morgado E, Marinkovic BA, Jardim PM, de Abreu MAS, Rizzo FC (2009) Characterization and thermal stability of cobalt-modified 1-D nanostructured trititanates. J Solid State Chem 182:172–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2008.10.00810.1016/j.jssc.2008.10.008 ↗
90. Balık M, Bulut V, Erdogan IY (2019) Optical, structural and phase transition properties of Cu2O, CuO and Cu2O/CuO: their photoelectrochemical sensor applications. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44:18744–18755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.08.15910.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.08.159 ↗
91. Xu S, Ng J, Du AJ, Liu J, Sun DD (2011) Highly efficient CuO incorporated TiO2 nanotube photocatalyst for hydrogen production from water Shiping. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:6560–6568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.02.10310.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.02.103 ↗
92. Zhen W, Jiao W, Wu Y, Jing H, Lu G (2017) The role of a metallic copper interlayer during visible photocatalytic hydrogen generation over a Cu/Cu 2 O/Cu/TiO 2 catalyst. Catal Sci Technol 7:5028–5037. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CY01432E10.1039/C7CY01432E ↗
93. Janczarek M, Kowalska E (2017) On the origin of enhanced photocatalytic activity of copper-modified titania in the oxidative reaction systems. Catalysts 7:317. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal711031710.3390/catal7110317 ↗
94. Adhikary J, Chakraborty P, Das B, Datta A, Dash SK, Roy S, Chen JW, Chattopadhyay T (2015) Preparation and characterization of ferromagnetic nickel oxide nanoparticles from three different precursors: application in drug delivery. RSC Advances 5(45):35917-35928. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA00642B10.1039/C5RA00642B ↗
95. Mohapatra SK, Banerjee S, Misra M (2008) Synthesis of Fe 2 O 3 / TiO 2 nanorod–nanotube arrays by filling TiO 2 nanotubes with Fe. Nanotechnology 19:315601. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/19/31/31560110.1088/0957-4484/19/31/315601 ↗
96. Peng Q, Peng G, Wu L, Li J, Wang X, Liu M, Li X (2019) Fe2O3 modification promotes the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 nanotube confined Pd nanoparticles. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 380:111865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.11186510.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.111865 ↗
97. Han WQ, Wen W, Yi D, Liu Z, Maye MM, Lewis L, Hanson J, Gang O (2007) Fe-doped trititanate nanotubes: formation, optical and magnetic properties, and catalytic applications. J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces 111:14339–14342. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp074381f10.1021/jp074381f ↗
98. Ghobadi N (2013) Band gap determination using absorption spectrum fitting procedure. Int Nano Lett 3:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2228-5326-3-210.1186/2228-5326-3-2 ↗
99. Makuła P, Pacia M, Macyk W (2018) How to correctly determine the band gap energy of modified semiconductor photocatalysts based on UV–Vis spectra. J Phys Chem Lett 9:6814–6817. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0289210.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02892 ↗
100. Ding T, Yang M, Zhang J, Yang B, Lin K, Li J, Gan J (2017) Toxicity, degradation and metabolic fate of ibuprofen on freshwater diatom Navicula sp. J Hazard Mater 330:127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.02.00410.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.02.004 ↗