journal article·2022-10

High performance of a new solar cell based on carbon nanotubes with CBTS compound as BSF using SCAPS-1D software

Essaadia Oublal, Abdelaziz Ait Abdelkadir, Mustapha Sahal

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 24· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper aims in a simulation work of a novel hybrid heterostructure based on carbon nanotubes as absorber layer with its unique electronic properties in semiconductor technology, and copper barium tin sulfide (CBTS) compound as a back surface field. Cell optimization was investigated in SCAPS–1D software for the architectures ITO/CdS/SWCNTs and ITO/CdS/SWCNTs/CBTS. The device performance and the influence of different materials parameters such as thickness, carrier concentration, and defect density are analyzed in this article. After adding the BSF layer and optimized physical parameters, promising results were achieved with PCE of 30.92%, Voc of 0.83 V, Jsc of 43.47 mA/cm2, and FF of 86.18%.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Semiconductor materials and interfaces

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Tifidat K, Maouhoub N, Benahmida A (2021) An efficient numerical method and new analytical model for the prediction of the five parameters of photovoltaic generators under non-STC conditions. E3S Web Conf 297:01034. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20212970103410.1051/e3sconf/202129701034 ↗
2. Ghobadi A, Yousefi M, Minbashi M, Kordbacheh AHA, Abdolvahab AH, Gorji NE (2020) Simulating the effect of adding BSF layers on Cu2BaSnSSe3 thin film solar cells. Opt Mater 107:109927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2020.10992710.1016/j.optmat.2020.109927 ↗
3. Bae SH, Zhao H, Hsieh YT, Zuo L, De Marco N, Rim YS, Li G, Yang Y (2016) Printable solar cells from advanced solution-processible materials. Chem 1:197–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2016.07.01010.1016/j.chempr.2016.07.010 ↗
4. Meher SR, Balakrishnan L, Alex ZC (2016) Analysis of Cu2ZnSnS4/CdS based photovoltaic cell: a numerical simulation approach. Superlattices Microstruct 100:703–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2016.10.02810.1016/j.spmi.2016.10.028 ↗
5. Wang S, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Ding L, Zeng Q, Wang Z, Liang X, Gao M, Shen J, Xu H, Chen Q, Cui R, Li Y, Peng LM (2009) Photovoltaic effects in asymmetrically contacted CNT barrier-free bipolar diode. J Phys Chem C 113:6891–6893. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp901282h10.1021/jp901282h ↗
6. Wang F, Matsuda K (2019) Applications of carbon nanotubes in solar cells. Springer Int Publ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92917-0_2010.1007/978-3-319-92917-0_20 ↗
7. Pradhan B, Batabyal SK, Pal AJ (2006) Functionalized carbon nanotubes in donor/acceptor-type photovoltaic devices. Appl Phys Lett 88:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.217937210.1063/1.2179372 ↗
8. Wieland L, Li H, Rust C, Chen J, Flavel BS (2021) Carbon nanotubes for photovoltaics: from lab to industry. Adv Energy Mater 11 https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20200288010.1002/aenm.202002880 ↗
9. Kymakis E, Amaratunga GAJ (2005) Carbon nanotubes as electron acceptors in polymeric photovoltaics. Rev Adv Mater Sci 10:300–305
10. Xosrovashvili G, Gorji NE (2014) Numerical simulation of carbon nanotubes/GaAs hybrid PV devices with AMPS-1D. Int J Photoenergy 2014 https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/78485710.1155/2014/784857 ↗
11. Wang F, Kozawa D, Miyauchi Y, Hiraoka K, Mouri S, Ohno Y, Matsuda K (2015) Considerably improved photovoltaic performance of carbon nanotube-based solar cells using metal oxide layers. Nat Commun 6:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms730510.1038/ncomms7305 ↗
12. Yang Y, Chen H, Zheng X, Meng X, Zhang T, Hu C, Bai Y, Xiao S, Yang S (2017) Ultrasound-spray deposition of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on NiO nanoparticles-embedded perovskite layers for high-performance carbon-based perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy 42:322–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.00310.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.003 ↗
13. Al-Bahrani MR, Ahmad W, Sen Ruan S, Yang Z, Cheng Z, Gao Y (2015) Layer-by-layer deposition of CNT- and CNT+ hybrid films for platinum free counters electrodes of dye-sensitized-solar-cells. RSC Advances 5:95551–95557. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra15939c10.1039/c5ra15939c ↗
14. Sgobba V, Guldi DM (2008) Carbon nanotubes as integrative materials for organic photovoltaic devices. J Mater Chem 18:153–157. https://doi.org/10.1039/b713798m10.1039/b713798m ↗
15. Khan D, Ali Z, Asif D, Kumar Panjwani M, Khan I (2021) Incorporation of carbon nanotubes in photoactive layer of organic solar cells. Ain Shams Eng J 12:897–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.06.00210.1016/j.asej.2020.06.002 ↗
16. Khan D, Tan ZA, Khan I, Panjwani MK (2018) A review of the challenges and possibilities of using carbon nanotubes in organic solar cells. Sci Adv Mater 10:747–760. https://doi.org/10.1166/sam.2018.326010.1166/sam.2018.3260 ↗
17. Von Roos O (1978) A simple theory of back surface field (BSF) solar cells. J Appl Phys 49:3503–3511. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.32526210.1063/1.325262 ↗
18. Ge J, Koirala P, Grice CR, Roland PJ, Yu Y, Tan X, Ellingson RJ, Collins RW, Yan Y (2017) Oxygenated CdS buffer layers enabling high open-circuit voltages in earth-abundant Cu2BaSnS4 thin-film solar cells. Adv Energy Mater 7 https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20160180310.1002/aenm.201601803 ↗
19. Shin D, Saparov B, Zhu T, Huhn WP, Blum V, Mitzi DB (2016) BaCu2Sn(S, Se)4: earth-abundant chalcogenides for thin-film photovoltaics. Chem Mater 28:4771–4780. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0183210.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01832 ↗
20. Khattak YH, Baig F, Toura H, Beg S, Soucase BM (2019) Efficiency enhancement of Cu2BaSnS4 experimental thin-film solar cell by device modeling. J Mater Sci 54:14787–14796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03942-610.1007/s10853-019-03942-6 ↗
21. Burgelman M, Nollet P, Degrave S (2000) Modelling polycrystalline semiconductor solar cells. Thin Solid Films 361:527–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00825-110.1016/S0040-6090(99)00825-1 ↗
22. Ahmmed S, Aktar A, Hossain J, Ismail ABM (2020) Enhancing the open circuit voltage of the SnS based heterojunction solar cell using NiO HTL. Sol Energy 207:693–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.07.00310.1016/j.solener.2020.07.003 ↗
23. Erkan ME, Chawla V, Scarpulla MA (2016) Reduced defect density at the CZTSSe/CdS interface by atomic layer deposition of Al2O3 J Appl Phys 119 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4948947.10.1063/1.4948947 ↗
24. Li Z, Saini V, Dervishi E, Kunets VP, Zhang J, Xu Y, Biris AR, Salamo GJ, Biris AS (2010) Polymer functionalized n-type single wall carbon nanotube photovoltaic devices. Appl Phys Lett 96 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.328465710.1063/1.3284657 ↗
25. Wei J, Jia Y, Shu Q, Gu Z, Wang K, Zhuang D, Zhang G, Wang Z, Luo J, Cao A, Wu D (2007) Double-walled carbon nanotube solar cells. Nano Lett 7:2317–2321. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl070961c10.1021/nl070961c ↗
26. Al-Hattab M, Moudou L, Khenfouch M, Bajjou O, Chrafih Y, Rahmani K (2021) Numerical simulation of a new heterostructure CIGS/GaSe solar cell system using SCAPS-1D software. Sol Energy 227:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.08.08410.1016/j.solener.2021.08.084 ↗
27. Biplab SRI, Ali MH, Moon MMA, Pervez MF, Rahman MF, Hossain J (2020) Performance enhancement of CIGS-based solar cells by incorporating an ultrathin BaSi2 BSF layer. J Comput Electron 19:342–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10825-019-01433-010.1007/s10825-019-01433-0 ↗
28. Sarker S, Islam MT, Rauf A, Al Jame H, Jani MR, Ahsan S, Islam MS, Nishat SS, Shorowordi KM, Ahmed S (2021) A SCAPS simulation investigation of non-toxic MAGeI3-on-Si tandem solar device utilizing monolithically integrated (2-T) and mechanically stacked (4-T) configurations. Solar Energy 225:471–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.07.05710.1016/j.solener.2021.07.057 ↗
29. Kaminski A, Vandelle B, Fave A, Boyeaux JP, Nam LQ, Monna R, Sarti D, Laugier A (2002) Aluminium BSF in silicon solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 72:373–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0248(01)00185-410.1016/S0927-0248(01)00185-4 ↗
30. Kohara N, Nishiwaki S, Hashimoto Y, Negami T, Wada T (2001) Electrical properties of the Cu(In, Ga)Se2/MoSe2/Mo structure. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 67:209–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0248(00)00283-X10.1016/S0927-0248(00)00283-X ↗
31. Yang X, Chen B, Chen J, Zhang Y, Liu W, Sun Y (2018) ZnS thin film functionalized as back surface field in Si solar cells. Mater Sci Semicond Process 74:309–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2017.08.01110.1016/j.mssp.2017.08.011 ↗
32. Guirdjebaye N, Ouédraogo S, TeyouNgoupo A, MbopdaTcheum GL, Ndjaka JMB (2019) Junction configurations and their impacts on Cu(In, Ga)Se2 based solar cells performances. Opto-Electron Rev 27:70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.opelre.2019.02.00110.1016/j.opelre.2019.02.001 ↗
33. Heriche H, Rouabah Z, Bouarissa N (2017) New ultra thin CIGS structure solar cells using SCAPS simulation program. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:9524–9532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.02.09910.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.02.099 ↗
34. Bouich A, Hartiti B, Ullah S, Ullah H, Touhami ME, Santos DMF, Mari B (2019) Experimental, theoretical, and numerical simulation of the performance of CuIn x Ga (1–x) S 2 -based solar cells. Optik 183:137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.02.06710.1016/j.ijleo.2019.02.067 ↗
35. van Dyk EE, Meyer EL (2004) Analysis of the effect of parasitic resistances on the performance of photovoltaic modules. Renew Energy 29:333–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(03)00250-710.1016/S0960-1481(03)00250-7 ↗