Composition and Processing Descriptors Govern Electroceramic Property Prediction: A Multi-Modal Interpretable Framework for BaTiO3-Based Ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Establishing interpretable relationships among composition, processing, and properties in BaTiO 3 -based electroceramics remains a central challenge in functional materials design, where dielectric and piezoelectric performance depend on the complex interplay among alloy chemistry, synthesis conditions, and microstructure. This study presents a multi-modal, explainable learning framework integrating experimental measurements, density functional theory (DFT)-derived compositional descriptors, and literature-extracted synthesis conditions to predict and interpret the piezoelectric coefficient ( d 33 ), dielectric constant ( ɛ r ), and bulk density of BaTiO 3 -based ceramics. A consensus-based feature selection strategy combining Mutual Information, LightGBM, XGBoost, and SHAP reduces 24 candidate descriptors to 15 physically meaningful features, revealing that alloying chemistry and compositional identity are the dominant determinants of dielectric and piezoelectric response, consistent with established structure–property relationships in ferroelectric ceramics. A two-level stacking ensemble with a Ridge meta-learner adaptively weights modality contributions, achieving R 2 = 0.874 ± 0.015 for d 33 , 0.845 ± 0.024 for ɛ r , and 0.687 ± 0.127 for density, while reducing prediction variance by up to 30.4% over naïve feature concatenation. The results confirm the primacy of experimental processing descriptors, demonstrate a complementary contribution of NLP-extracted thin-film synthesis conditions to piezoelectric prediction, and establish a generalizable, interpretable pipeline extensible to broader perovskite functional material families.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Electrophoretic Deposition in Materials Science · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Artificial intelligence-powered materials science
2. Generative artificial intelligence and its applications in materials science: Current situation and future perspectives10.1016/j.jmat.2023.05.001 ↗
3. Different applications of machine learning approaches in materials science and engineering: Comprehensive review10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108783 ↗
4. Big data creates new opportunities for materials research: A review on methods and applications of machine learning for materials design10.1016/j.eng.2019.02.011 ↗
5. Application of machine learning for advanced material prediction and design10.1002/eom2.12194 ↗
6. Recent progress on barium titanate-based ferroelectrics for sensor applications10.1002/adsr.202300168 ↗
7. Origin of ultrahigh-performance barium titanate-based piezoelectrics: Stannum-induced intrinsic and extrinsic contributions10.1038/s41467-024-52031-z ↗
8. Processing–structure–property prediction in polycrystalline batio3 ceramics using experimental and computational data fusion
9. A general-purpose machine learning framework for predicting properties of inorganic materials10.1038/npjcompumats.2016.28 ↗
10. Learning properties of ordered and disordered materials from multi-fidelity data10.1038/s43588-020-00002-x ↗
11. Foundation models for materials discovery10.1038/s41524-025-01538-0 ↗
12. Multimodal alignment and fusion: A survey
13. Matmmfuse: Multimodal fusion model for material property prediction
14. Predicting materials properties without crystal structure: Deep representation learning from stoichiometry
15. Graph networks as a universal machine learning framework for molecules and crystals
16. High-throughput machine-learning-driven synthesis of full heusler compounds
17. A comprehensive review on deep learning-based data fusion10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3508271 ↗
18. Machine learning regression guided thermoelectric materials discovery–a review
19. Data dimensionality reduction in materials science10.1016/B978-0-12-394399-6.00006-0 ↗
20. Interpretable and explainable machine learning for materials science and chemistry10.1021/accountsmr.1c00244 ↗
21. A. Ganguli, Machine Learning Aided Feature Selection for Ultrahigh Dimensional Data: Theory and Applications, Michigan State University, 2023.
22. Cross-material inverse learning and knowledge transfer for property-driven design of advanced ceramics10.1016/j.jallcom.2026.187165 ↗
23. Towards accurate interpretable predictions of materials properties within transformer language models10.1016/j.patter.2023.100803 ↗
24. Small data machine learning in materials science10.1038/s41524-023-01000-z ↗
25. Data-driven materials science: Status, challenges, and perspectives
26. Reinforcement learning optimizes feature selection in modeling materials
27. machine learning approaches for diverse alloy systems10.1007/s10853-025-11154-4 ↗
28. A comparative study on recent automatic data fusion methods10.3390/computers13010013 ↗
29. Toward efficient dielectric material discovery: a comparative evaluation of transformer and automl-based inverse learning10.1080/21870764.2025.2570561 ↗
30. Unimat: Unifying materials embeddings through multi-modal learning
31. Cast: Cross attention based multimodal fusion of structure and text for materials property prediction
32. Interpretability in machine learning models for materials science
33. Machine learning of material properties: Predictive and interpretable multilinear models
34. Data quantity governance for machine learning in materials science10.1093/nsr/nwad125 ↗
35. A general framework to govern machine learning oriented materials data quality10.1016/j.mser.2025.101050 ↗
36. Domain knowledge-assisted materials data anomaly detection towards constructing high-performance machine learning models10.1016/j.jmat.2025.101066 ↗
37. Improving the energy storage performance of barium titanate-based ceramics through the addition of zno-bi2o3-sio2 glass10.3390/cryst14030242 ↗
38. Comparative investigations of electronic, mechanical and optical responses of ra-doping in barium titanate for optoelectronic applications: A computational insight10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24607 ↗
39. Estimating mutual information10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066138 ↗
40. G. Ke, Q. Meng, T. Finley, T. Wang, W. Chen, W. Ma, Q. Ye, T.-Y. Liu, LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30, Curran Associates, Inc., 2017, pp. 3146–3154.
41. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
42. T. Chen, C. Guestrin, XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system, in: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016, pp. 785–794.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗