High depolarization temperature and superior piezoelectric performance with complex structural evolution in BiFeO3PbTiO3–(Sr0.7Bi0.2□0.1)TiO3 systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Bismuth ferrite–based ferroelectric ceramics are considered strong competitors in high–temperature piezoelectric applications that benefits from their high depolarization temperature (Td), but problems of large conductivity and low piezoelectric coefficient (d33) should be tackled. BiFeO3PbTiO3–x(Sr0.7Bi0.2□0.1)TiO3 (BF–PT–xSBT) ternary system are designed in this work that successfully resolves this tough paradox. Rietveld refinements show that this system exhibits multiphase coexistence with complex structural transition among rhombohedral, tetragonal and pseudocubic phase. Interestingly, a high Td ∼320 °C and d33 ∼ 236 pC/N are synergistically optimized in x=0.20 composition near pseudo–phase boundary, which are indicated by multi–scale techniques (phase structure, dielectric analysis etc.). What's more, dual electrostrain peaks appear at separate phase boundaries for x=0.20 and 0.66 compositions with distinct piezo/ferroelectric properties. Rayleigh law and piezoelectric force microscopy analysis clarify that the optimal electrostrain performance for both critical compositions are dominated by intrinsic (x=0.20) and extrinsic (x=0.66) contributions, respectively. This work not only provides a new BF–PT–xSBT system with a high Td and superior d33 that are promising candidates in high–temperature actuator and sensor applications, but also presents a possibility of multiphase–coexistence established exotic macroscopic performances.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Multiferroics and related materials · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. Eitel · Jpn J Appl Phys · 2001 · 40 · 599910.1143/JJAP.40.5999 ↗
2. Wu · J. Materiomics · 2021 · 7 · 25410.1016/j.jmat.2020.10.004 ↗
3. Shi · ACS Appl Mater Interfaces · 2021 · 13 · 1438510.1021/acsami.1c00790 ↗
4. Wu · Chem Rev · 2015 · 115 · 255910.1021/cr5006809 ↗
5. Hao · Mater Sci Eng R · 2019 · 135 · 110.1016/j.mser.2018.08.001 ↗
6. Cai · J. Materiomics · 2019 · 5 · 39410.1016/j.jmat.2019.04.005 ↗
7. Zhang · J Am Ceram Soc · 2008 · 91 · 292810.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02564.x ↗
8. Catalan · Adv Mater · 2009 · 21 · 246310.1002/adma.200802849 ↗
9. Yu · J Am Ceram Soc · 2020 · 103 · 643510.1111/jace.17382 ↗
10. Liu · J Mater Chem C · 2019 · 7 · 512210.1039/C9TC00826H ↗
11. Zhao · J Mater Chem C · 2020 · 8 · 156210.1039/C9TC06887B ↗
12. Lebeugle · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 7610.1103/PhysRevB.76.024116 ↗
13. Neaton · Phys Rev B · 2005 · 7110.1103/PhysRevB.71.014113 ↗
14. Ederer · Phys Rev Lett · 2005 · 9510.1103/PhysRevLett.95.257601 ↗
15. Rojac · J Am Ceram Soc · 2014 · 97 · 199310.1111/jace.12982 ↗
16. Habib · J Materiomics · 2021 · 7 · 4010.1016/j.jmat.2020.07.001 ↗
17. Xun · J Eur Ceram Soc · 2019 · 39 · 408510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.06.015 ↗
18. Cheng · J Mater Chem C · 2018 · 6 · 398210.1039/C8TC00329G ↗
19. Woodward · J Appl Phys · 2003 · 94 · 331310.1063/1.1595726 ↗
20. Ning · J Eur Ceram Soc · 2020 · 40 · 233810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.01.059 ↗
21. Leist · J Appl Phys · 2010 · 10810.1063/1.3445771 ↗
22. Jia · J Eur Ceram Soc · 2021 · 41 · 244310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.11.053 ↗
23. Jian · Ceram Int · 2018 · 44 · 2177410.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.275 ↗
24. Zhao · J Appl Phys · 2018 · 124
25. Rojac · J Appl Phys · 2010 · 10810.1063/1.3490249 ↗
26. Morozov · Appl Phys Lett · 2012 · 10110.1063/1.4772588 ↗
27. Simons · Appl Phys Lett · 2013 · 102
28. Li · J Eur Ceram Soc · 2020 · 40 · 391810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.05.030 ↗
29. Zhang · Adv Mater · 2009 · 21 · 471610.1002/adma.200901516 ↗
30. Liu · Adv Mater · 2016 · 28 · 57410.1002/adma.201503768 ↗
31. Li · Acta Mater · 2017 · 128 · 33710.1016/j.actamat.2017.02.037 ↗
32. Narayan · Nat Mater · 2018 · 17 · 42710.1038/s41563-018-0060-2 ↗
33. Li F, et al. (Unpublished).
34. Zhao · J Eur Ceram Soc · 2014 · 34 · 423510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.07.017 ↗
35. Zhao · J Eur Ceram Soc · 2016 · 36 · 245310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.03.002 ↗
36. Chen · J Am Ceram Soc · 2021 · 104 · 468710.1111/jace.17904 ↗
37. Zhuang · Adv Electron Mater · 2022 · 810.1002/aelm.202100883 ↗
38. Wang · J Appl Phys · 2012 · 112
39. Viehland · J Appl Phys · 1990 · 68 · 291610.1063/1.346425 ↗
40. Uchino · Ferroelectrics · 1982 · 44 · 5510.1080/00150198208260644 ↗
41. Yu · J Appl Phys · 2021 · 129
42. Li · Appl Phys Lett · 2021 · 118
43. Viola · J Appl Phys · 2013 · 11410.1063/1.4812383 ↗
44. Li · J Appl Phys · 2017 · 121
45. Jaffe · 1971
46. Zhao · Adv Funct Mater · 2019 · 29
47. Bokov · J Mater Sci · 2006 · 41 · 3110.1007/s10853-005-5915-7 ↗
48. Xia · J Materiomics · 2021 · 7 · 114310.1016/j.jmat.2021.01.007 ↗
49. Chen · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 90
50. Cheng · J Appl Phys · 2004 · 96 · 661110.1063/1.1810633 ↗
51. Joseph · Ceram Int · 2017 · 43 · 1667610.1016/j.ceramint.2017.09.058 ↗
52. Yao · J Adv Ceram · 2012 · 1 · 227
53. Pang · J Alloys Compd · 2017 · 709 · 1610.1016/j.jallcom.2017.03.114 ↗
54. Gao · J Am Ceram Soc · 2018 · 101 · 338310.1111/jace.15499 ↗
55. Chen · IEEE T Ultrason Ferr · 2009 · 56 · 182010.1109/TUFFC.2009.1255 ↗
56. Chen · J Am Ceram Soc · 2016 · 99 · 53610.1111/jace.14003 ↗
57. Guo · Ceram Int · 2020 · 46 · 2239710.1016/j.ceramint.2020.05.322 ↗
58. Shen · Ceram Int · 2016 · 42 · 786810.1016/j.ceramint.2016.01.112 ↗
59. Cheng · J Am Ceram Soc · 2004 · 86 · 211110.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03617.x ↗
60. Yao · J Appl Phys · 2011 · 109
61. Haun · Ferroelectrics · 1989 · 99 · 1310.1080/00150198908221436 ↗
62. Eitel · J Appl Phys · 2006 · 9910.1063/1.2207738 ↗
63. Liu · Acta Mater · 2019 · 164 · 1210.1016/j.actamat.2018.10.029 ↗
64. Yang · Adv Electron Mater · 2019 · 5
65. Ahluwalia · Phys Rev B · 2005 · 7210.1103/PhysRevB.72.014112 ↗
66. Shi · J Phys D Appl Phys · 2022 · 55
67. Zheng · Adv Electron Mater · 2020 · 6