Effects of heterofunctional alkali-metal formate doping on perovskite solar cell performance
Source abstract
Abstract
Various internal and external defects present in the perovskite film are one of the main factors that cause low efficiency and stability, and in order to realize high-performance perovskite solar cells, it is necessary to develop a method to effectively suppress them. In this study, a heterofunctional dopants strategy was attempted to integrate the effect of alkali metal cations (Rb + and K + ) and formate anion (HCOO¯) through doping engineering with alkali-metal formates, i.e. , rubidium formate (RbHCOO) and potassium formate (KHCOO). Inclusive physical and photoelectric analysis revealed that doping with a small amount of alkali-metal formate leads to crystal growth and reduction of grain boundaries, and further passivates or inhibits bulk and surface defects. As a result, the photogenerated charge recombination was reduced and the charge carrier transport was improved, leading to improved PSC performance. RbHCOO-doped inverted planar PSCs achieved a PCE of up to 20.41% with long-term stability. Our findings provide a way for producing high-quality perovskite films with low defect densities that are essential for realizing high-performance PSCs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Kim · Science · 2022 · 375 · 30210.1126/science.abh1885 ↗
2. Xu · Nano Energy · 2020 · 67
3. Xu · ACS Sustainable Chem Eng · 2017 · 5 · 971810.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01490 ↗
4. Rühle · Sol Energy · 2016 · 130 · 13910.1016/j.solener.2016.02.015 ↗
5. Xu · Energy Environ Sci · 2021 · 14 · 429210.1039/D1EE00890K ↗
6. Li · J Mater Chem · 2017 · 5 · 1260210.1039/C7TA01798G ↗
7. Chen · Chem Soc Rev · 2019 · 48 · 384210.1039/C8CS00853A ↗
8. Mahapatra · J Mater Chem · 2020 · 8 · 2710.1039/C9TA07657C ↗
9. Pereyra · J Energy Chem · 2021 · 60 · 599
10. Cao · J Energy Chem · 2022 · 68 · 420
11. Li · J Mater Chem · 2019 · 7 · 2415010.1039/C9TA08130E ↗
12. Gao · Adv Energy Mater · 2020 · 10
13. Cai · Electrochim Acta · 2019 · 293 · 37110.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.034 ↗
14. Luo · J Mater Chem C · 2019 · 7 · 278110.1039/C8TC05741A ↗
15. Xu · Mater Today Nano · 2019 · 6
16. Jiang · ES Mater Manufact · 2020 · 7 · 25
17. Bi · ACS Energy Lett · 2017 · 2 · 140010.1021/acsenergylett.7b00356 ↗
18. Tang · Nano Energy · 2018 · 45 · 18410.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.047 ↗
19. Cao · Adv Mater · 2018 · 30
20. Li · J Mater Chem · 2017 · 5 · 1260210.1039/C7TA01798G ↗
21. Zhao · Nano-Micro Lett · 2021 · 13 · 16910.1007/s40820-021-00688-2 ↗
22. Zheng · J Mater Chem · 2018 · 6 · 993010.1039/C8TA02121J ↗
23. Choi · Nano Energy · 2020 · 7110.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104639 ↗
24. Moore · Chem Mater · 2015 · 27 · 319710.1021/cm5047484 ↗
25. Seo · Adv Energy Mater · 2016 · 610.1002/aenm.201600767 ↗
26. Meng · J Energy Chem · 2020 · 41 · 43
27. Chao · Acc Mater Res · 2021 · 2 · 105910.1021/accountsmr.1c00154 ↗
28. Jeong · Nature · 2021 · 592 · 38110.1038/s41586-021-03406-5 ↗
29. Peng · Chem Soc Rev · 2017 · 46 · 571410.1039/C6CS00942E ↗
30. Mann · Appl Surf Sci · 2021 · 56010.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149973 ↗
31. Le Corre · ACS Energy Lett · 2021 · 6 · 108710.1021/acsenergylett.0c02599 ↗
32. Zheng · Nat Commun · 2018 · 9 · 279310.1038/s41467-018-05076-w ↗
33. Xu · Adv Mater · 2022 · 34
34. Jeyakumar · Sol Energy · 2021 · 221 · 45610.1016/j.solener.2021.04.029 ↗
35. Guo · J Mater Chem · 2018 · 6 · 215710.1039/C7TA09946K ↗
36. Chen · ACS Appl Mater Interfaces · 2015 · 7 · 447110.1021/acsami.5b00077 ↗
37. Kang · ACS Energy Lett · 2020 · 5 · 253510.1021/acsenergylett.0c01130 ↗
38. Kiermasch · Sci Rep · 2016 · 610.1038/srep39333 ↗
39. McNeill · J Appl Phys · 2009 · 10610.1063/1.3177337 ↗
40. Tabassum · SN Appl Sci · 2021 · 3 · 110.1007/s42452-021-04877-x ↗