Potential lack of “standardized” processing techniques for production of allogeneic and xenogeneic bone blocks for application in humans
Source abstract
Abstract
In the present study, the structure of two allogeneic and three xenogeneic bone blocks, which are used in dental and orthopedic surgery, were histologically analyzed. The ultimate goal was to assess whether the components postulated by the manufacturer can be identified after applying conventional histological and histochemical staining techniques. Three samples of each material, i.e. allogeneic material-1 and -2 as well as xenogeneic material-1, -2 and -3, were obtained commercially. After decalcification and standardized embedding processes, conventional histological staining was performed in order to detect inorganic matrix, cellular or organic matrix components. Allogeneic material-1 showed trabecular bone-like structures, which were free of cellular components as well as of organic matrix. The allogeneic material-2 showed trabecular bone structures, in which connective tissue and cellular remnants were embedded. Additionally, some connective tissue, which resembled fat-like tissue, was found within this material. The xenogeneic material-1 showed trabecular bone-like structures and contained organic components comparable to that demonstrated for the allogeneic material-2. The xenogeneic material-2 showed trabecular bone structures with single cells located in lacunae. The xenogeneic material-3 also showed trabecular structures. Neither cellular nor organic matrix components were found within this material. According to the data of the present study, the allogeneic material-1 and the xenogeneic material-3 were the only investigated materials for which the obtained histological data were in accordance with the manufactureŕs advertised information. The remaining three materials showed discrepancies-although the manufacturers of all five bone substitute materials stated that their blocks were free of organic/cellular remnants. These data are of great clinical and material science interest. It seems that even patented processing techniques are not always able to deliver reproducible materials. Although the manufacturers of all five bone blocks stated that their blocks were free of organic/cellular remnants, our histological analysis revealed that three out of five bone blocks did contain such remnants. Such specimens might be able to induce an immune response within the recipient.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Bone graft and bone graft substitutes: a review of current technology and applications10.1002/jab.770020307 ↗
2. Morbidity at bone graft donor sites10.1097/00005131-198909000-00002 ↗
3. A review of bone substitutes10.1016/j.coms.2007.06.002 ↗
4. Bovine-HA spongiosa blocks and immediate implant placement in sinus augmentation procedures. Histopathological and histomorphometric observations on different histological stainings in 10 consecutive patients10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130411.x ↗
5. Immune responses to osteochondral allografts: nature and significance10.3928/0147-7447-19921001-08 ↗
6. Clinical efficacy and compatibility of allogeneic avital tissue transplants sterilized with a peracetic acid/ethanol mixture10.1023/A:1024697515420 ↗
7. Regeneration of vascularized bone10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00158.x ↗
8. Sinus grafting with porous bone mineral (Bio-Oss) for implant placement: a 5-year study on 15 patients
9. Clinical evaluation of anorganic bovine bone xenograft with a bioabsorbable collagen barrier in the treatment of molar furcation defects
10. Efficacy of porous bovine bone mineral in various types of osseous deficiencies: clinical observations and literature review
11. Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitute leads to sufficient bone tissue formation already after 3months: histological and histomorphometrical analysis 3 and 6months following human sinus cavity augmentation
12. Histological and histomorphometrical analysis of a silica matrix embedded nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitute using the subcutaneous implantation model in Wistar rats10.1088/1748-6041/5/3/035005 ↗
13. Maxillary sinus grafting with a nano-structured biomaterial: preliminary clinical and histological results10.1159/000197215 ↗
14. Romeis · 2007
15. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using a nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite silica gel: case series and 3-month preliminary histological results10.1016/j.aanat.2011.04.007 ↗
16. Ghanaati · Biomed Mater · 2012 · 7 · 1500510.1088/1748-6041/7/1/015005 ↗
17. Fat in bone xenografts: importance of the purification procedures on cleanliness, wettability and biocompatibility10.1016/0142-9612(93)90238-W ↗
18. Regulation of dendritic- and T-cell fate by injury-associated endogenous signals10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v29.i1.30 ↗
19. Macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcomes in response to biologic scaffolds with and without a cellular component10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.040 ↗
20. Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.054 ↗
21. Biokompatibilitätstestung unterschiedlich sterilisierter bzw. desinfizierter allogener Knochentransplantate im Vergleich zum Goldstandard der autologen Knochenspende–Eine “In-vitro”-Analyse der Immunmodulation10.1055/s-2005-918191 ↗
22. Einfluss verschiedener Knochendesinfektions- und Sterilisationsverfahren auf die Osteoblastenfunktion. Eine vergleichende In-vitro-Studie10.1007/s001130050554 ↗
23. Allograft safety: efficacy of the Tutoplast process
24. Vertical ridge augmentation of atrophic posterior mandible using an inlay technique with a xenograft without miniscrews and miniplates: case series10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02083.x ↗
25. Histological results after maxillary sinus augmentation with Straumann® BoneCeramic, Bio-Oss®, Puros®, and autologous bone. A randomized controlled clinical trial10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02431.x ↗
26. Clinical, histologic, and histomorphometric evaluation of mineralized solvent-dehydrated bone allograf (Puros) in human maxillary sinus grafts10.1563/1548-1336(2005)31[171:CHAHEO]2.0.CO;2 ↗
27. Human histologic analysis of mineralized bone allograft (Puros) placement before implant surgery10.1563/0.693.1 ↗
28. Comparison of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (Puros) and anorganic bovine bone matrix (Bio-Oss) for sinus augmentation: histomorphometry at 26 to 32 weeks after grafting
29. A clinical study of 406 sinus augmentations with 100% anorganic bovine bone10.1902/jop.2009.090263 ↗
30. Cellular xenotransplantation10.1097/MOT.0b013e3283292522 ↗
31. Extracellular matrix scaffolds for cartilage and bone regeneration10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.12.004 ↗