journal article·2019-02Open access

Looking deep into nature: A review of micro-computed tomography in biomimicry

Anton du Plessis, Chris Broeckhoven

Acta Biomaterialia· Volume 85

Abstract

Albert Einstein once said "look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better". Looking deep into nature has in the last few years become much more achievable through the use of high-resolution X-ray micro-computed tomography (microCT). The non-destructive nature of microCT, combined with three-dimensional visualization and analysis, allows for the most complete internal and external "view" of natural materials and structures at both macro- and micro-scale. This capability brings with it the possibility to learn from nature at an unprecedented level of detail in full three dimensions, allowing us to improve our current understanding of structures, learn from them and apply them to solve engineering problems. The use of microCT in the fields of biomimicry, biomimetic engineering and bioinspiration is growing rapidly and holds great promise. MicroCT images and three-dimensional data can be used as generic bio-inspiration, or may be interpreted as detailed blueprints for specific engineering applications, i.e., reverse-engineering nature. In this review, we show how microCT has been used in bioinspiration and biomimetic studies to date, including investigations of multifunctional structures, hierarchical structures and the growing use of additive manufacturing and mechanical testing of 3D printed models in combination with microCT. The latest microCT capabilities and developments which might support biomimetic studies are described and the unique synergy between microCT and biomimicry is demonstrated. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This review highlights the growing use of X-ray micro computed tomography in biomimetic research. We feel the timing of this paper is excellent as there is a significant growth and interest in biomimetic research, also coupled with additive manufacturing, but still no review of the use of microCT in this field. The use of microCT for structural biomimetic and biomaterials research has huge potential but is still under-utilized, partly due to lack of knowledge of the capabilities and how it can be used in this field. We hope this review fills this gap and fuels further advances in this field using microCT.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Anatomy and Medical Technology · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Bar-Cohen · 2006
2. Bar-Cohen · 2012
3. J. Benyus, Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature, (1997). http://www.academia.edu/download/5239337/biomimicry-innovation-inspired-by-nature.pdf (accessed September 2, 2018).
4. Product and technology innovation: what can biomimicry inspire?10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.10.002 ↗
5. Biological materials: functional adaptations and bioinspired designs10.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.03.001 ↗
6. Biological materials: a materials science approach10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.08.005 ↗
7. On the materials science of Nature’s arms race
8. Structural design elements in biological materials: application to bioinspiration10.1002/adma.201502403 ↗
9. Functional gradients and heterogeneities in biological materials: Design principles, functions, and bioinspired applications10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.013 ↗
10. Bio-mimetic mechanisms of natural hierarchical materials: a review10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.012 ↗
11. Recent progress in biomimetic additive manufacturing technology: from materials to functional structures
12. A protocol for bioinspired design: a ground sampler based on sea urchin jaws
13. Analyzing nature’s protective design: the glyptodont body armor10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.03.037 ↗
14. Additive manufacturing as a method to design and optimize bioinspired structures10.1002/adma.201800940 ↗
15. Quantitative X-ray tomography10.1179/1743280413Y.0000000023 ↗
16. Laboratory x-ray micro-computed tomography: a user guideline for biological samples10.1093/gigascience/gix027 ↗
17. Industrial applications of computed tomography10.1016/j.cirp.2014.05.011 ↗
18. X-ray microcomputed tomography in additive manufacturing: a review of the current technology and applications, 3D print
19. X-ray micro computed-tomography10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.066 ↗
20. X-ray microtomography in herpetological research: a review10.1163/15685381-20181102 ↗
21. X-ray microtomography in biology10.1016/j.micron.2011.10.002 ↗
22. X-ray micro-computed tomography (μCT) for non-destructive characterisation of food microstructure10.1016/j.tifs.2015.10.016 ↗
23. Practical cone-beam algorithm10.1364/JOSAA.1.000612 ↗
24. Principles of computerized tomographic imaging (society for industrial and applied mathematics)
25. Using X-ray computed tomography analysis tools to compare the skeletal element morphology of fossil and modern frog (Anura) species
26. Comparison of medical and industrial X-ray computed tomography for non-destructive testing10.1016/j.csndt.2016.07.001 ↗
27. Kalender · 2011
28. ASTM E1570-11, Standard Practice for Computed Tomographic (CT) Examination, ASTM E1570-11. (2011).
29. Beauty is more than skin deep: a non-invasive protocol for in vivo anatomical study using micro-CT10.1111/2041-210X.12661 ↗
30. Biomechanics and Functional Morphology of Plants—Inspiration for Biomimetic Materials and Structures
31. From natural branchings to technical joints: branched plant stems as inspiration for biomimetic fibre-reinforced composites10.2495/DNE-V8-N2-144-153 ↗
32. Multiscale structure and damage tolerance of coconut shells10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.05.024 ↗
33. Microstructure and mechanical properties of hard Acrocomia mexicana fruit shell10.1038/s41598-018-27282-8 ↗
34. Araujo Mariath, Bionics and design: 3D microstructural characterization and numerical analysis of bamboo based on X-ray microtomography10.1016/j.matchar.2016.09.022 ↗
35. 3D printed structures for modeling the Young’s modulus of bamboo parenchyma10.1016/j.actbio.2017.12.036 ↗
36. Novel water filtration of saline water in the outermost layer of mangrove roots
37. Biological attachment devices: Exploring nature’s diversity for biomimetics, Philos. Trans. R
38. Competing with barnacle cement: wetting resistance of a re-entrant surface reduces underwater adhesion of barnacles Authors for correspondence10.1098/rsif.2018.0396 ↗
39. Correlative Imaging and Bio-inspiration: Multi-scale and Multi-modal Investigations of the Acorn Barnacle (Semibalanus balanoides)10.1017/S1431927618002374 ↗
40. Microstructure and micromechanics of the heart urchin test from X-ray tomography10.1016/j.actbio.2015.05.007 ↗
41. Crustacean-inspired helicoidal laminates10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.04.007 ↗
42. Interrelated chemical-microstructural-nanomechanical variations in the structural units of the cuttlebone of Sepia officinalis10.1063/1.4993202 ↗
43. The cuttlefish Sepia officinalis (Sepiidae, Cephalopoda) constructs cuttlebone from a liquid-crystal precursor10.1038/srep11513 ↗
44. Built to fight: variable loading conditions and stress distribution in stag beetle jaws10.1088/1748-3190/10/4/046006 ↗
45. Cost of flight and the evolution of stag beetle weaponry10.1098/rsif.2015.0222 ↗
46. Mechanoreceptor distribution in stag beetle jaws corresponds to the material stress in fights10.1016/j.asd.2015.03.003 ↗
47. Beetle elytra as role models for lightweight building construction
48. Dragonfly wing nodus: a one-way hinge contributing to the asymmetric wing deformation10.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.034 ↗
49. Structural analysis of a dragonfly wing10.1007/s11340-010-9411-x ↗
50. A biological screw in a beetle’s leg10.1126/science.1204245 ↗
51. The dual function of orchid bee ocelli as revealed by X-ray microtomography10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.038 ↗
52. Structure and fracture resistance of alligator gar (Atractosteus spatula) armored fish scales10.1016/j.actbio.2012.12.026 ↗
53. Bioinspiration from fish for smart material design and function10.1088/0964-1726/20/9/094014 ↗
54. Quantitative microstructural studies of the armor of the marine threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus)10.1016/j.jsb.2010.04.009 ↗
55. The armored carapace of the boxfish10.1016/j.actbio.2015.05.024 ↗
56. Highly deformable bones: Unusual deformation mechanisms of seahorse armor10.1016/j.actbio.2013.02.045 ↗
57. A comparative study of bio-inspired protective scales using 3D printing and mechanical testing10.1016/j.actbio.2017.03.025 ↗
58. 3D-printing and mechanics of bio-inspired articulated and multi-material structures10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.12.016 ↗
59. Biomimetic shark skin: design, fabrication and hydrodynamic function10.1242/jeb.097097 ↗
60. Hydrodynamic function of biomimetic shark skin: effect of denticle pattern and spacing10.1088/1748-3190/10/6/066010 ↗
61. Structure and mechanical implications of the pectoral fin skeleton in the Longnose Skate (Chondrichthyes, Batoidea)10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.026 ↗
62. Has snake fang evolution lost its bite? New insights from a structural mechanics viewpoint10.1098/rsbl.2017.0293 ↗
63. Snake fangs: 3D morphological and mechanical analysis by microCT, simulation, and physical compression testing10.1093/gigascience/gix126 ↗
64. Leatherback sea turtle shell: a tough and flexible biological design10.1016/j.actbio.2015.09.023 ↗
65. Micro-structure and mechanical properties of the turtle carapace as a biological composite shield10.1016/j.actbio.2012.12.023 ↗
66. Functional trade-off between strength and thermal capacity of dermal armor: Insights from girdled lizards10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.007 ↗
67. Beauty is more than skin deep: a non-invasive protocol for in vivo anatomical study using micro-CT10.1111/2041-210X.12661 ↗
68. Reinforcements in avian wing bones: experiments, analysis, and modeling10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.020 ↗
69. Extreme lightweight structures: avian feathers and bones10.1016/j.mattod.2017.02.004 ↗
70. Structure and micro-computed tomography-based finite element modeling of Toucan beak10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.08.003 ↗
71. Toucan and hornbill beaks: a comparative study10.1016/j.actbio.2009.08.026 ↗
72. A mechanical analysis of woodpecker drumming and its application to shock-absorbing systems10.1088/1748-3182/6/1/016003 ↗
73. A comparative analysis of the avian skull: Woodpeckers and chickens10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.05.001 ↗
74. Structural analysis of the tongue and hyoid apparatus in a woodpecker10.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.030 ↗
75. A review of terrestrial, aerial and aquatic keratins: the structure and mechanical properties of pangolin scales, feather shafts and baleen plates10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.05.015 ↗
76. Energy absorbent natural materials and bioinspired design strategies: a review10.1016/j.msec.2010.01.011 ↗
77. Mechanical function of a complex three-dimensional suture joining the bony elements in the shell of the red-eared slider turtle10.1002/adma.200801256 ↗
78. Migué Lez, Numerical analysis for design of bioinspired ceramic modular armors for ballistic protections
79. Armadillo armor: Mechanical testing and micro-structural evaluation10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.12.013 ↗
80. Lamellae spatial distribution modulates fracture behavior and toughness of African pangolin scales10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.009 ↗
81. Enhanced protective role in materials with gradient structural orientations: lessons from Nature10.1016/j.actbio.2016.08.005 ↗
82. Static flexural properties of hedgehog spines conditioned in coupled temperature and relative humidity environments10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.009 ↗
83. W. Kyung Cho, J.A. Ankrum, D. Guo, S.A. Chester, S. Yun Yang, A. Kashyap, G.A. Campbell, R.J. Wood, R.K. Rijal, R. Karnik, R. Langer, J.M. Karp, Microstructured barbs on the North American porcupine quill enable easy tissue penetration and difficult removal, (n.d.). doi:10.1073/pnas.1216441109.10.1073/pnas.1216441109 ↗
84. The evolution of animal weapons10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173502 ↗
85. Hierarchical structure and compressive deformation mechanisms of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) horn10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.043 ↗
86. Horn and horn core trabecular bone of bighorn sheep rams absorbs impact energy and reduces brain cavity accelerations during high impact ramming of the skull10.1016/j.actbio.2016.08.019 ↗
87. Characterization of seal whisker morphology: Implications for whisker-inspired flow control applications10.1088/1748-3190/aa8885 ↗
88. Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: a review10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012 ↗
89. Metallic powder-bed based 3D printing of cellular scaffolds for orthopaedic implants: a state-of-the-art review on manufacturing, topological design, mechanical properties and biocompatibility10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.094 ↗
90. Additively manufactured scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and the prediction of their mechanical behavior: a review10.3390/ma10010050 ↗
91. Numerical comparison of lattice unit cell designs for medical implants by additive manufacturing
92. D. Qu, C.Z. Mosher, M.K. Boushell, H.H. Lu, Engineering Complex Orthopaedic Tissues Via Strategic Biomimicry, (n.d.). doi:10.1007/s10439-014-1190-6.10.1007/s10439-014-1190-6 ↗
93. The CT scanner facility at stellenbosch university: an open access x-ray computed tomography laboratory10.1016/j.nimb.2016.08.005 ↗
94. C. Foster, The Sea Change project, (n.d.). http://www.seachangeproject.com (accessed September 14, 2018).
95. A new method for the model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images10.1046/j.1365-2818.1997.1340694.x ↗
96. Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 3: Surface roughness10.1016/j.mex.2018.09.004 ↗
97. Vander Sloten, Individualised, micro CT-based finite element modelling as a tool for biomechanical analysis related to tissue engineering of bone10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00516-7 ↗
98. Computations of Absolute Permeability on Micro-CT Images10.1007/s11004-012-9431-4 ↗
99. Micro CT for comparative morphology: Simple staining methods allow high-contrast 3D imaging of diverse non-mineralized animal tissues10.1186/1472-6793-9-11 ↗
100. Diffusible iodine-based contrast-enhanced computed tomography (diceCT): An emerging tool for rapid, high-resolution, 3-D imaging of metazoan soft tissues10.1111/joa.12449 ↗