journal article·2022-05-27Open access

Mechanical Properties of Atomic-Layer-Deposited Al2O3/Y2O3 Nanolaminate Films on Aluminum toward Protective Coatings

Janne-Petteri Niemelä, Barbara Putz, Gustavo Mata-Osoro, Carlos Guerra-Nuñez, Remo N. Widmer, Nadia Rohbeck, Thomas E. J. Edwards, Max Döbeli, Krzysztof Maćkosz, Aleksandra Szkudlarek, Yury Kuzminykh, Xavier Maeder, Johann Michler, Bernhard Andreaus, Ivo Utke

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 5· Issue 5

Abstract

Atomic layer deposition is an appealing deposition technology for the fabrication of protective coatings for various applications, including semiconductor manufacturing chambers and related metallic parts with complex three-dimensional topographies, where a key requirement is (thermo)mechanical robustness of the coatings. Here, we study the mechanical properties of atomic-layer-deposited Al2O3, Y2O3, and their nanolaminate (NL) coatings on an Al metal substrate. Tensile straining experiments accompanied by in situ optical and scanning electron microscopy indicate that the fragmentation onset of 100 nm thick coatings can be tailored in the strain range of 1.3–2.1% by controlling the layer structure and composition of the NLs, such that a higher Al2O3 content, denser layer spacing, and amorphization favor higher crack onset strain. Although the fracture toughness of Al2O3 and Y2O3 is found to be similar, KIC = 1.3 MPa·m1/2, the (substantially tensile) intrinsic residual stress for Y2O3 is a disadvantage for applications, where applied tensile stresses are to be expected. The films adhere well to the Al substrate as significant delamination of the films is not observed in the tensile experiments; the analysis of the fragmentation patterns indicates that insertion of an Al2O3 layer at the film/substrate interface can enhance the interface toughness. High-temperature (425 °C) tensile experiments for the Al2O3 films indicate good temperature tolerance for the coatings, and in comparison to the room-temperature data, a significant difference is seen in the increase of saturation crack spacing. Moreover, the structure and composition of the films are studied in detail through X-ray reflection and diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, Rutherford backscattering spectrometry, and elastic recoil detection analysis. The results are particularly interesting for protective coating applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory for Mechanics of Materials and Nanostructures, Empa─Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Feuerwerkerstrasse 39, CH-3602 Thun, Switzerland

Department of Materials Science, Montanuniversität Leoben, Franz Josef Strasse 18, AT-8700 Leoben, Austria

INFICON AG, Alte Landstrasse 6, 9496 Balzers, Principality of Liechtenstein

Ion Beam Physics, ETH Zürich, HPK H32, Otto-Stern-Weg 5, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland

Academic Centre for Materials and Nanotechnology, AGH University of Science and Technology, av. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland

Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, av. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland

Funding

H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions · CTI

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Shih H. · 201210.5772/1844 ↗
2. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04589.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04589.x ↗
3. 10.1051/jp4:199986210.1051/jp4:1999862 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.02.03610.1016/j.corsci.2011.02.036 ↗
5. 10.1149/2.061111jes10.1149/2.061111jes ↗
6. 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.08.05210.1016/j.elecom.2009.08.052 ↗
7. 10.1149/1.356019710.1149/1.3560197 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.08.06610.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.08.066 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.08.07810.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.08.078 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20070007910.1002/adma.200700079 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.475790710.1063/1.4757907 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20120039710.1002/adma.201200397 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20130471410.1002/adma.201304714 ↗
14. 10.1109/jphotov.2018.279710610.1109/jphotov.2018.2797106 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.10437510.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104375 ↗
16. 10.1088/0268-1242/26/3/03400110.1088/0268-1242/26/3/034001 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.315312310.1063/1.3153123 ↗
18. 10.1179/1743280412y.000000000910.1179/1743280412y.0000000009 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0034210.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00342 ↗
20. 10.3390/nano1003055810.3390/nano10030558 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.00810.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.008 ↗
22. 10.1016/0956-7151(92)90145-510.1016/0956-7151(92)90145-5 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.08.01110.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.08.011 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.312464210.1063/1.3124642 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.01510.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.015 ↗
26. 10.1039/d0dt02210a10.1039/d0dt02210a ↗
27. 10.1021/acsanm.0c0316310.1021/acsanm.0c03163 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.0c0466510.1021/acsami.0c04665 ↗
29. 10.1016/s0257-8972(00)00552-110.1016/s0257-8972(00)00552-1 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.11.11210.1016/j.tsf.2013.11.112 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.136939510.1063/1.1369395 ↗
32. Mishnaevsky L. L. · 2007
33. Daniel I. M. · 2006
34. 10.1177/00219983680020030810.1177/002199836800200308 ↗
35. 10.1107/s010876738901259610.1107/s0108767389012596 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.170973010.1063/1.1709730 ↗
37. 10.1149/1.342870510.1149/1.3428705 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.tsf.2016.02.04910.1016/j.tsf.2016.02.049 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.tsf.2016.02.04910.1016/j.tsf.2016.02.049 ↗
40. 10.1021/jp209003h10.1021/jp209003h ↗
41. 10.1134/s106373971901002510.1134/s1063739719010025 ↗
42. 10.1039/d0ra09876k10.1039/d0ra09876k ↗
43. 10.1073/pnas.101969810810.1073/pnas.1019698108 ↗
44. 10.3390/nano901008810.3390/nano9010088 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jmps.2020.10414510.1016/j.jmps.2020.104145 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.optmat.2011.05.03510.1016/j.optmat.2011.05.035 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.07.04710.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.07.047 ↗
48. 10.1002/(sici)1099-0488(19970715)35:9<1463::aid-polb16>3.0.co;2-410.1002/(sici)1099-0488(19970715)35:9<1463::aid-polb16>3.0.co;2-4 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.01510.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.015 ↗
50. 10.1016/0020-7683(92)90015-l10.1016/0020-7683(92)90015-l ↗
51. 10.1016/j.solmat.2012.07.01310.1016/j.solmat.2012.07.013 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.eml.2016.03.01210.1016/j.eml.2016.03.012 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.03210.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.032 ↗
54. 10.1016/s0040-6090(98)00418-010.1016/s0040-6090(98)00418-0 ↗
55. 10.1103/physrevb.67.09210510.1103/physrevb.67.092105 ↗
56. 10.1002/pssc.20046017910.1002/pssc.200460179 ↗
57. 10.1103/physrevlett.85.322510.1103/physrevlett.85.3225 ↗
58. 10.1088/0022-3727/40/12/02510.1088/0022-3727/40/12/025 ↗
59. 10.1016/s0040-6090(02)01262-210.1016/s0040-6090(02)01262-2 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.01.11810.1016/j.apsusc.2005.01.118 ↗
61. 10.1016/s1359-6454(03)00088-010.1016/s1359-6454(03)00088-0 ↗