Efficient Modeling and Tailoring of Nonlinear Wavefronts in Dielectric Metasurfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Dielectric metasurfaces provide a unique platform for efficient harmonic generation and optical wavefront manipulation at the nanoscale. Tailoring phase and amplitude of a nonlinearly generated wave with a high emission efficiency using resonance-based metasurfaces is a challenging task that often requires state-of-the-art numerical methods. Here, we propose a simple yet effective approach combining a sampling method with a Monte Carlo approach to design the third-harmonic wavefront generated by all-dielectric metasurfaces composed of elliptical silicon nanodisks. Using this approach, we theoretically demonstrate the full nonlinear 2π phase control with a uniform and highest possible amplitude in the considered parameter space, allowing us to design metasurfaces operating as third harmonic beam deflectors capable of steering light into a desired direction with high emission efficiency. The TH beam deflection with a record calculated average conversion efficiency of 1.2 × 10 –1 W –2 is achieved. We anticipate that the proposed approach will be widely applied as alternative to commonly used optimization algorithms with higher complexity and implementation effort for the design of metasurfaces with other holographic functionalities.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Paderborn University, Theoretical Electrical Engineering, Warburger Str. 100, 33098 Paderborn, Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adom.20180010410.1002/adom.201800104 ↗
2. 10.1515/nanoph-2020-037310.1515/nanoph-2020-0373 ↗
3. 10.1109/JPROC.2019.294318310.1109/JPROC.2019.2943183 ↗
4. 10.1557/mrs.2020.6510.1557/mrs.2020.65 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41566-021-00793-z10.1038/s41566-021-00793-z ↗
6. 10.1021/nl303445u10.1021/nl303445u ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.16677010.1016/j.ijleo.2021.166770 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.494900710.1063/1.4949007 ↗
9. 10.1021/ph400073w10.1021/ph400073w ↗
10. 10.1073/pnas.191215411610.1073/pnas.1912154116 ↗
11. 10.1021/nl302516v10.1021/nl302516v ↗
12. 10.1126/science.aaa249410.1126/science.aaa2494 ↗
13. 10.1038/ncomms1253310.1038/ncomms12533 ↗
14. 10.1038/ncomms380810.1038/ncomms3808 ↗
15. 10.1364/OPTICA.3.00150410.1364/OPTICA.3.001504 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.11390110.1103/PhysRevLett.118.113901 ↗
17. 10.1364/OME.38135410.1364/OME.381354 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c0002810.1021/acsphotonics.1c00028 ↗
19. 10.1002/adom.20190205010.1002/adom.201902050 ↗
20. 10.1021/nn402736f10.1021/nn402736f ↗
21. 10.1038/s41598-019-42444-y10.1038/s41598-019-42444-y ↗
22. 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c0022210.1021/acsphotonics.1c00222 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0146010.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01460 ↗
24. 10.1039/b711486a10.1039/b711486a ↗
25. 10.1364/OE.20.02814210.1364/OE.20.028142 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.06.00710.1016/j.mattod.2017.06.007 ↗
27. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.1010.1038/natrevmats.2017.10 ↗
28. 10.1515/nanoph-2018-001110.1515/nanoph-2018-0011 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c0135610.1021/acsphotonics.1c01356 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0431110.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04311 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0110510.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01105 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41566-022-01018-710.1038/s41566-022-01018-7 ↗
33. 10.1126/sciadv.abb312310.1126/sciadv.abb3123 ↗
34. 10.1038/nnano.2015.6910.1038/nnano.2015.69 ↗
35. 10.1364/JOSAB.36.000E3010.1364/JOSAB.36.000E30 ↗
36. 10.1021/nl503029j10.1021/nl503029j ↗
37. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0063110.1021/acsphotonics.7b00631 ↗
38. Mansouree M. · 2019 · 1
39. 10.1098/rspa.2015.083510.1098/rspa.2015.0835 ↗
40. 10.1002/adom.20170064510.1002/adom.201700645 ↗
41. 10.1038/s41377-019-0159-510.1038/s41377-019-0159-5 ↗
42. 10.1021/nl504057310.1021/nl5040573 ↗
43. 10.1038/nnano.2016.22410.1038/nnano.2016.224 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41377-018-0060-710.1038/s41377-018-0060-7 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0317110.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03171 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.513479210.1063/1.5134792 ↗
47. 10.1002/lpor.20200044810.1002/lpor.202000448 ↗
48. COMSOL Multiphysics; COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden, www.comsol.com (accessed 2023–05–03).
49. 10.1364/OPTICA.41332910.1364/OPTICA.413329 ↗
50. Taflove A. · 2005 · 2062
51. Swanson, G. J. Binary optics technology: theoretical limits on the diffraction efficiency of multilevel diffractive optical elements. Technical report; Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1991.
52. 10.1063/1.359227010.1063/1.3592270 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.06.00910.1016/j.solmat.2008.06.009 ↗