Inverse Design of Optical Switch Based on Bilevel Optimization Inspired by Meta-Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
We introduce the concept of meta-learning into the design of active optical switches. An optical switch consists of both tunable and nontunable elements. It has been difficult to apply conventional inverse design methods to optical switches, since the optimal choice of the tunable elements depends on the design of the nontunable elements. Here we show that a bilevel optimization scheme, closely related to the concept of meta-learning, can be used for the design of active optical switches. In this scheme, the inner and outer loops correspond to the optimization of the tunable and nontunable elements, respectively. We illustrate this scheme with two designs of optical switches based on different tuning mechanisms. This approach is generally applicable for the design of optical switches as well as other active and tunable optical devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photonic and Optical Devices · Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices · Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Applied Physics and Ginzton Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
Department of Electrical Engineering and Ginzton Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
Funding
Air Force Office of Scientific Research
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41566-018-0246-910.1038/s41566-018-0246-9 ↗
2. 10.1002/advs.20200292310.1002/advs.202002923 ↗
3. 10.1364/JOSAB.40604810.1364/JOSAB.406048 ↗
4. 10.1038/s42005-021-00568-610.1038/s42005-021-00568-6 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c0031310.1021/acsphotonics.2c00313 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.01402310.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.014023 ↗
7. 10.1088/1361-6463/ac931d10.1088/1361-6463/ac931d ↗
8. 10.1364/OE.26.00323610.1364/OE.26.003236 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c0076810.1021/acsphotonics.0c00768 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c0002010.1021/acsphotonics.2c00020 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c0111910.1021/acsphotonics.1c01119 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c0078710.1021/acsphotonics.0c00787 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c0153910.1021/acsphotonics.1c01539 ↗
14. 10.3390/app1109382210.3390/app11093822 ↗
15. 10.1515/nanoph-2022-030910.1515/nanoph-2022-0309 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c0185010.1021/acsphotonics.1c01850 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c0032710.1021/acsphotonics.0c00327 ↗
18. 10.1137/S105262349936282210.1137/S1052623499362822 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0137710.1021/acsphotonics.7b01377 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0185710.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01857 ↗
21. 10.1515/nanoph-2019-033010.1515/nanoph-2019-0330 ↗
22. Agrahari, R.; Ghosh, S. K.; Bhattacharyya, S. Optical Switching; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2022; Chapter 1, pp 13–30.10.1002/9781119819264.ch1 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467-021-25841-810.1038/s41467-021-25841-8 ↗
24. Finn, C.; Abbeel, P.; Levine, S. Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networks. ICML. 2017; pp 1126–1135.
25. 10.48550/arXiv.1909.0463010.48550/arXiv.1909.04630 ↗
26. Lou, B.; Zhao, N.; Wang, J. Meta-learning from sparse recovery. Fifth Workshop on Meta-Learning at the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2021.
27. 10.1145/338625210.1145/3386252 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41586-022-04415-810.1038/s41586-022-04415-8 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41467-018-03155-610.1038/s41467-018-03155-6 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c0038110.1021/acsphotonics.2c00381 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b0123810.1021/acsphotonics.9b01238 ↗
32. Goodfellow, I.; Bengio, Y.; Courville, A. Deep Learning. MIT Press, 2016; http://www.deeplearningbook.org (accessed 2023–04–01).
33. 10.1016/j.cma.2011.08.00610.1016/j.cma.2011.08.006 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.06.05710.1016/j.jcp.2019.06.057 ↗
35. 10.1364/OE.43118810.1364/OE.431188 ↗
36. Wang, H.; Zhao, H.; Li, B. Bridging multi-task learning and meta-learning: Towards efficient training and effective adaptation. International Conference on Machine Learning, 2021; pp 10991–11002.
37. Abdollahzadeh M. · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems · 2021 · 34 · 14632
38. Hsieh, Y.P.; Mertikopoulos, P.; Cevher, V. The Limits of Min-Max Optimization Algorithms: Convergence to Spurious Non-Critical Sets. Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2021; pp 4337–4348.
39. Zhang, C.; Bengio, S.; Hardt, M.; Recht, B.; Vinyals, O. Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization. International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017.
40. Poole B. · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems · 2016 · na
41. 10.1063/5.004871210.1063/5.0048712 ↗
42. 10.1038/srep4230610.1038/srep42306 ↗
43. 10.1364/OE.10.00104810.1364/OE.10.001048 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.01.01310.1016/j.jcp.2012.01.013 ↗
45. Jin J. · 2014
46. 10.1038/s41467-019-12196-410.1038/s41467-019-12196-4 ↗
47. 10.1515/nanoph-2020-003910.1515/nanoph-2020-0039 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.isci.2022.10472710.1016/j.isci.2022.104727 ↗
49. 10.34133/2019/184927210.34133/2019/1849272 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.13610110.1103/PhysRevLett.126.136101 ↗
51. 10.1063/5.004730810.1063/5.0047308 ↗
52. 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c0126310.1021/acsphotonics.1c01263 ↗
53. 10.1126/sciadv.add433910.1126/sciadv.add4339 ↗
54. 10.48550/arXiv.2303.0232510.48550/arXiv.2303.02325 ↗
55. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0462810.1021/acsnano.2c04628 ↗