journal article·2015-12-16

High-Order Hilbert Curves: Fractal Structures with Isotropic, Tailorable Optical Properties

Stefano De Zuani, Thomas Reindl, Marcus Rommel, Bruno Gompf, Audrey Berrier, Martin Dressel

ACS Photonics· Volume 2· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Fractals are promising candidates as nonperiodic, nonresonant structures exhibiting a homogeneous, isotropic, and frequency-independent effective optical response. We present a comprehensive optical investigation of a metallic Hilbert curve of fractal order N = 9 in the visible and near-infrared spectral range. Our experiments show that high-order fractal nanostructures exhibit a nearly frequency independent reflectance and an in-plane isotropic optical response. The response can be simulated in the framework of a simple effective medium approximation model with a limited number of parameters. It is shown that high-order Hilbert structures can be considered as a “transparent in-plane metal”, the dielectric function of which is modified by the filling factor f, hence creating a tunable conductive effective metal with tailorable plasma frequency and variable reflectance without going through an insulator-to-metal transition.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications · Quasicrystal Structures and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Physikalisches Institut and Research Center SCoPE, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 57, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany

Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research, Heisenbergstrasse 1, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany

Funding

Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.116607910.1126/science.1166079 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.109679610.1126/science.1096796 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.18550110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.185501 ↗
4. 10.1364/OE.20.01116610.1364/OE.20.011166 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.185708610.1063/1.1857086 ↗
6. 10.1002/pssa.20092557910.1002/pssa.200925579 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.03540210.1103/PhysRevB.81.035402 ↗
8. 10.1029/96RS0212610.1029/96RS02126 ↗
9. Mandelbrot B. B. · 198310.1119/1.13295 ↗
10. 10.1109/8.66411510.1109/8.664115 ↗
11. 10.1109/LMWC.2003.82257110.1109/LMWC.2003.822571 ↗
12. 10.1109/LAWP.2002.80605010.1109/LAWP.2002.806050 ↗
13. 10.1007/s00339-014-8679-610.1007/s00339-014-8679-6 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0041210.1021/acsnano.5b00412 ↗
15. 10.1364/OE.22.01950410.1364/OE.22.019504 ↗
16. 10.1002/pssr.20110513610.1002/pssr.201105136 ↗
17. 10.1088/0957-4484/24/20/20570210.1088/0957-4484/24/20/205702 ↗
18. 10.1364/OE.19.00361210.1364/OE.19.003612 ↗
19. 10.1007/BF0119943110.1007/BF01199431 ↗
20. 10.1007/BF0119943810.1007/BF01199438 ↗
21. Peitgen H. O. · 2004 · 192
22. Sanchez-Hernandez D. A. · 2008 · 101
23. Schroeder M. R. · 1984 · 326
24. 10.1063/1.481672610.1063/1.4816726 ↗
25. 10.1021/nl501738b10.1021/nl501738b ↗
26. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.24310.1038/nphoton.2013.243 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mee.2013.02.10110.1016/j.mee.2013.02.101 ↗
28. 10.1088/2040-8978/14/6/06300110.1088/2040-8978/14/6/063001 ↗
29. 10.1126/science.119825810.1126/science.1198258 ↗
30. 10.1364/OPEX.13.00063610.1364/OPEX.13.000636 ↗
31. Choy T. C. · 1999