journal article·2019-09-18

Nonlinear Pancharatnam−Berry Phase Metasurfaces beyond the Dipole Approximation

Sylvain D. Gennaro, Yi Li, Stefan A. Maier, Rupert F. Oulton

ACS Photonics· Volume 6· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Nanoscale optical antennas mediate frequency mixing processes via their optical modes. Within arrays, metasurfaces provide unique opportunities to control nonlinear processes. Macroscopic interpretations have so far prevailed, relying on arguments of underlying antenna symmetry. In this article, we show where such interpretations break down. We construct nonlinear gradient metasurfaces to produce diffraction orders of both second-harmonic and four-wave-mixing radiation. However, we find that higher order modes are required to explain the presence of diffraction orders not predicted by the generalized law of nonlinear refraction. A simple adaptation of the law to include higher order modes extends the interpretation of geometric phase nonlinear metasurfaces to include complex composite antennas and explains the observation of apparently symmetry disallowed nonlinear processes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The Blackett Laboratory, Department of Physics, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.

Chair in Hybrid Nanosystems, Nanoinstitute Munich, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80539 München, Germany

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Leverhulme Trust

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.24710.1038/nphoton.2014.247 ↗
2. 10.1038/nmat383910.1038/nmat3839 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.123200910.1126/science.1232009 ↗
4. 10.1088/1361-6633/aa873210.1088/1361-6633/aa8732 ↗
5. 10.1364/OPTICA.4.00013910.1364/OPTICA.4.000139 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.06.00710.1016/j.mattod.2017.06.007 ↗
7. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.1010.1038/natrevmats.2017.10 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0437310.1021/acsnano.5b04373 ↗
9. 10.1038/ncomms1036710.1038/ncomms10367 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41598-017-09726-910.1038/s41598-017-09726-9 ↗
11. 10.1007/BF0304605010.1007/BF03046050 ↗
12. 10.1080/0950034871455132110.1080/09500348714551321 ↗
13. 10.1038/scientificamerican1288-4610.1038/scientificamerican1288-46 ↗
14. 10.1364/OL.27.00114110.1364/OL.27.001141 ↗
15. 10.1364/OL.36.00114310.1364/OL.36.001143 ↗
16. 10.1038/ncomms638610.1038/ncomms6386 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.aaf341710.1126/science.aaf3417 ↗
18. 10.1038/srep3596810.1038/srep35968 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0026310.1021/acsphotonics.7b00263 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0136310.1021/acsphotonics.7b01363 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.121071310.1126/science.1210713 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b0056410.1021/acsphotonics.6b00564 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.11390110.1103/PhysRevLett.118.113901 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.20740310.1103/PhysRevLett.115.207403 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.21430310.1103/PhysRevB.94.214303 ↗
26. 10.1038/nmat426710.1038/nmat4267 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.04610110.1103/PhysRevLett.121.046101 ↗
28. 10.1364/OE.25.02836310.1364/OE.25.028363 ↗
29. 10.1002/lpor.20180003410.1002/lpor.201800034 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0248510.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02485 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.151043910.1063/1.1510439 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.01102410.1103/PhysRevX.9.011024 ↗
33. 10.1038/nmat421410.1038/nmat4214 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.07740110.1103/PhysRevLett.105.077401 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.16740310.1103/PhysRevLett.98.167403 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.24390410.1103/PhysRevLett.118.243904 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b0038710.1021/acsphotonics.8b00387 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0030210.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00302 ↗
39. 10.1021/nn205053310.1021/nn2050533 ↗
40. 10.1038/ncomms474810.1038/ncomms4748 ↗
41. Fowles G. R. · 1989