journal article·2016-02-17

Exploiting Optical Asymmetry for Controlled Guiding of Particles with Light

Ognjen Ilic, Ido Kaminer, Yoav Lahini, Hrvoje Buljan, Marin Soljačić

ACS Photonics· Volume 3· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Conventional methods of manipulating particles with light, such as optical tweezers and optical tractor beams, rely on beam-shaping to realize complex electromagnetic field profiles and are thus sensitive to scattering. Here, we show that, by introducing tailored optical asymmetry in the particle, we can realize a novel guiding method that is controllable by the frequency of light, without regard to the direction or the shape of the light beam. With detailed stochastic simulations, we demonstrate guiding of a two-faced nanoparticle where the optically induced thermophoretic drift serves as the propulsion mechanism. Exploiting the difference in resonant absorption spectra of the two materials, we create a bidirectional local thermal gradient that is externally switchable. This is advantageous because the frequency of a light beam, unlike its shape or coherence, is preserved even in strongly scattering environments. Since this approach is insensitive to scattering and applicable to many particles at once, as well as particles that cannot be optically resolved, it may enable useful applications in biology, microfluidics, in vivo tasks, and colloidal science.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Micro and Nano Robotics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States

Department of Physics, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Funding

Army Research Office · Seventh Framework Programme · Division of Materials Research

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/scientificamerican0901-7810.1038/scientificamerican0901-78 ↗
2. 10.1038/scientificamerican0509-7210.1038/scientificamerican0509-72 ↗
3. 10.1021/ja053937e10.1021/ja053937e ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.24720810.1103/PhysRevLett.94.247208 ↗
5. 10.1038/nature0409010.1038/nature04090 ↗
6. 10.1021/nn301312z10.1021/nn301312z ↗
7. 10.1002/chem.20050016710.1002/chem.200500167 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.26830210.1103/PhysRevLett.105.268302 ↗
9. 10.1021/nn305726m10.1021/nn305726m ↗
10. 10.1002/smll.20140362110.1002/smll.201403621 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.24.15610.1103/PhysRevLett.24.156 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.165391910.1063/1.1653919 ↗
13. 10.1038/nature0193510.1038/nature01935 ↗
14. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.5610.1038/nphoton.2011.56 ↗
15. 10.1038/ncomms148010.1038/ncomms1480 ↗
16. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.15310.1038/nphoton.2011.153 ↗
17. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.24210.1038/nphoton.2014.242 ↗
18. 10.1021/cr300089t10.1021/cr300089t ↗
19. 10.1088/0953-8984/16/38/03210.1088/0953-8984/16/38/032 ↗
20. 10.1088/1367-2630/9/5/12610.1088/1367-2630/9/5/126 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.01230110.1103/PhysRevE.88.012301 ↗
22. 10.1039/c2sc21263c10.1039/c2sc21263c ↗
23. 10.1021/nn501568e10.1021/nn501568e ↗
24. 10.1021/ph500371z10.1021/ph500371z ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.26450310.1103/PhysRevLett.103.264503 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.16390610.1103/PhysRevLett.105.163906 ↗
27. 10.1119/1.1872510.1119/1.18725 ↗
28. 10.1016/0375-9601(74)90822-610.1016/0375-9601(74)90822-6 ↗
29. Coffey W. · 199610.1142/2256 ↗
30. Lamb H. · 1945
31. Haynes W. · 2012
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.6.437010.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370 ↗
33. 10.1021/nl403345710.1021/nl4033457 ↗
34. Pierson H. O. · 1996
35. 10.1016/0040-6031(94)85058-510.1016/0040-6031(94)85058-5 ↗
36. 10.1073/pnas.060387310310.1073/pnas.0603873103 ↗
37. 10.1039/c0sm00854k10.1039/c0sm00854k ↗
38. 10.1021/la700489e10.1021/la700489e ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.10830310.1103/PhysRevLett.100.108303 ↗
40. 10.1002/lsm.2014310.1002/lsm.20143 ↗
41. Hamblin M. R. · 201310.1201/b15582 ↗