journal article·2025-12-23Open access

Excitons in Epitaxially Grown WS 2 on Graphene: A Nanometer-Resolved Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy and Density Functional Theory Study

Max Bergmann, Jürgen Belz, Oliver Maßmeyer, Badrosadat Ojaghi Dogahe, Robin Günkel, Johannes Glowatzki, Andreas Beyer, Ivan Solovev, Jens-Christian Drawer, Martin Esmann, Sergej Pasko, Simonas Krotkus, Michael Heuken, Stefan Wippermann, Kerstin Volz

ACS Nano· Volume 19· Issue 50

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide We investigate the excitonic properties of epitaxially grown WS 2 monolayers, bilayers and multilayers on graphene using monochromatic electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) in a scanning transmission electron microscope. This material system is particularly attractive for optoelectronic applications, as direct growth from the gas phase offers a scalable route to wafer-sized heterostructures. The combination of nanometer-scale spatial resolution and high spectral quality in EELS allows for a detailed analysis of layer-dependent excitonic features. To complement the experimental results, we perform ab initio simulations based on density functional theory and the Bethe–Salpeter equation. The experimental spectra reveal a systematic redshift of both A and B excitons at the K-valley─centered near 2.0 and 2.4 eV, respectively─as the number of WS 2 layers increases. While such redshifts are often attributed to dielectric screening, our ab initio calculations show that the dominant contribution arises from a subtle lattice mismatch between the lower and upper WS 2 layers. We trace this mismatch to the heteroepitaxial alignment of the first WS 2 layer to the graphene substrate during the growth process. Our results highlight how nanoscale structural distortions in epitaxial 2D materials can strongly influence key excitonic properties, even in the absence of intentional strain or alloying. By combining nanometer-scale electron spectroscopy with advanced theory, we establish a direct link between atomic structure and excitonic response in realistic, nonidealized heterostructures. These findings underscore the importance of microscopic interface effects in the design and scalable fabrication of exciton-based optoelectronic devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Graphene research and applications · Strong Light-Matter Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

mar.quest | Marburg Center for Quantum Materials and Sustainable Technologies,

Philipps-Universitat Marburg

Department of Physics, Philipps-Universitat Marburg, Hans Meerwein Str. 6, 35032 Marburg, Germany

Institute of Physics

Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg

AIXTRON SE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung · Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · H2020 Future and Emerging Technologies

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/revmodphys.90.02100110.1103/revmodphys.90.021001 ↗
2. 10.1038/ncomms1525110.1038/ncomms15251 ↗
3. 10.1038/nnano.2012.9510.1038/nnano.2012.95 ↗
4. 10.1038/ncomms188210.1038/ncomms1882 ↗
5. 10.1002/adom.20150030110.1002/adom.201500301 ↗
6. 10.1038/nnano.2012.9610.1038/nnano.2012.96 ↗
7. 10.1038/nphys54710.1038/nphys547 ↗
8. 10.1021/nn406156b10.1021/nn406156b ↗
9. 10.1016/0022-3697(82)90037-310.1016/0022-3697(82)90037-3 ↗
10. 10.1002/bbpc.1977081040310.1002/bbpc.19770810403 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.aac943910.1126/science.aac9439 ↗
12. 10.1088/1361-6463/ac16a410.1088/1361-6463/ac16a4 ↗
13. 10.1021/nl404795z10.1021/nl404795z ↗
14. 10.1021/nl201874w10.1021/nl201874w ↗
15. 10.1021/nl903868w10.1021/nl903868w ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.13680510.1103/PhysRevLett.105.136805 ↗
17. 10.1002/admi.20240015810.1002/admi.202400158 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.15542910.1103/PhysRevB.107.155429 ↗
19. 10.1039/C9NH00743A10.1039/C9NH00743A ↗
20. 10.1002/cmt2.710.1002/cmt2.7 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.117124510.1126/science.1171245 ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20180755010.1002/adfm.201807550 ↗
23. 10.1103/physrevlett.113.07680210.1103/physrevlett.113.076802 ↗
24. 10.1103/physrevlett.116.05640110.1103/physrevlett.116.056401 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.24120110.1103/PhysRevB.86.241201 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.620310.1103/PhysRevB.35.6203 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.14430910.1103/PhysRevB.99.144309 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.12.65910.1103/PhysRevB.12.659 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41586-022-04977-710.1038/s41586-022-04977-7 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.10760110.1103/PhysRevLett.114.107601 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c0474910.1021/acs.nanolett.2c04749 ↗
32. 10.1103/physrevb.94.08520110.1103/physrevb.94.085201 ↗
33. 10.1088/2053-1583/ad97c810.1088/2053-1583/ad97c8 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c0506310.1021/acs.nanolett.3c05063 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.20542210.1103/PhysRevB.90.205422 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41699-017-0003-910.1038/s41699-017-0003-9 ↗
37. 10.1103/physrevlett.124.08740110.1103/physrevlett.124.087401 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.231210.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2312 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.34.539010.1103/PhysRevB.34.5390 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.451010.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4510 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.451410.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4514 ↗
42. 10.1186/s40679-017-0042-510.1186/s40679-017-0042-5 ↗
43. 10.1021/ac60214a04710.1021/ac60214a047 ↗
44. 10.21105/joss.0086110.21105/joss.00861 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.15340210.1103/PhysRevB.84.153402 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0186810.1021/acsnano.1c01868 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.11520510.1103/PhysRevB.88.115205 ↗
48. 10.1021/nn305275h10.1021/nn305275h ↗
49. 10.1002/admi.20220158610.1002/admi.202201586 ↗
50. 10.1088/1361-6528/aaa92310.1088/1361-6528/aaa923 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.20640310.1103/PhysRevLett.123.206403 ↗
52. Tebbe D. · npj 2D Mater. Appl. · 2023 · 7 · 110.1038/s41699-023-00394-0 ↗
53. 10.1002/smll.20190490610.1002/smll.201904906 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2023.12711110.1016/j.jcrysgro.2023.127111 ↗
55. 10.1088/2053-1583/acf3f910.1088/2053-1583/acf3f9 ↗
56. de la Peña, F.; Prestat, E.; Tonaas Fauske, V.; Burdet, P.; Lähnemann, J.; Jokubauskas, P.; Furnival, T.; Nord, M.; Ostasevicius, T.; MacArthur, K. E.; Johnstone, D. N.; Sarahan, M.; Taillon, J.; Aarholt, T.; dls, p.; Migunov, V.; Eljarrat, A.; Caron, J.; Carter, F.; Nemoto, T. Hyperspy/Hyperspy: Release V1.7.3 ; Zenodo, 2022.
57. 10.12688/openreseurope.13015.210.12688/openreseurope.13015.2 ↗
58. 10.1088/0953-8984/22/25/25320210.1088/0953-8984/22/25/253202 ↗
59. 10.1103/physrevb.71.03510910.1103/physrevb.71.035109 ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.24512210.1103/PhysRevB.83.245122 ↗
61. 10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e ↗
62. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
63. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
64. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
65. 10.1002/jcc.2175910.1002/jcc.21759 ↗
66. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0078010.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00780 ↗
67. 10.1063/1.47852210.1063/1.478522 ↗
68. 10.1063/1.47293310.1063/1.472933 ↗
69. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.15530410.1103/PhysRevB.87.155304 ↗
70. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.20511910.1103/PhysRevB.73.205119 ↗
71. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.24530910.1103/PhysRevB.88.245309 ↗
72. Bergmann, M.; Belz, J.; Maßmeyer, O.; Dogahe, B. O.; Günkel, R.; Glowatzki, J.; Beyer, A.; Solovev, I.; Drawer, J.C.; Esmann, M.; Pasko, S.; Krotkus, S.; Heuken, M.; Wippermann, S.; Volz, K. Excitons in Epitaxially Grown WS 2 on Graphene: a Nanometer-Resolved Eels and Dft Study. arXiv 2024, arXiv.2402.13020.10.48550/arXiv.2402.13020 (accessed 11.17.2025).10.48550/arXiv.2402.13020 ↗