journal article·2025-10-21

Mobility Overestimation in Thin-Film Transistors: Effects of Device Geometry and Fringe Currents

Soohyun Kim, Youngjoon Lee, Seokyeon Shin, Hyunsoo Kim, Hyoseob Shin, Hideo Hosono, Changwook Jeong, Junghwan Kim

ACS Nano· Volume 19· Issue 41
Publisher page

Abstract

Amorphous oxide semiconductor-based thin-film transistors (oxide TFTs) were first demonstrated in 2004. These devices offer numerous advantages, including low-temperature processing, high carrier mobility, and ultralow off-current. As a result, oxide TFTs have already been adopted for backplane technologies in modern flat-panel displays. Furthermore, their ultralow off-current has attracted considerable attention for next-generation DRAM applications. However, device reliability remains a critical challenge. In particular, gate bias stress instabilities such as negative bias temperature stress and positive bias temperature stress significantly hinder the advancement of high-mobility oxide TFTs beyond low-temperature polycrystalline silicon (LTPS) technology. Therefore, the evaluation of both field-effect mobility (FEM) and bias stability is essential for oxide TFTs. The absolute value of FEM is especially important when identifying candidate materials to replace LTPS. In this context, we have recently found that incorrect FEM evaluation methods have been widely used in numerous published studies. Such errors have resulted in overestimated FEM values, potentially compromising objective comparisons of materials and fabrication processes. This study clearly demonstrates, through both experimental data and simulation-analytical modeling, how and why FEM overestimation occurs. In particular, we derive a compact analytical expression based on conformal mapping and validate it using TCAD simulations and measurements. This dual-pronged approach establishes a general framework for identifying and correcting mobility overestimation. This study highlights the importance of recognizing and addressing mobility overestimation within the field, and that the proposed FEM evaluation method should be adopted to enable more objective and reliable comparisons.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate School of Semiconductor Materials and Devices Engineering

Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology

MDX Research Center for Element Strategy, Institute of Integrated Research

Institute of Science Tokyo

Funding

Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology · National Research Foundation of Korea · Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature0309010.1038/nature03090 ↗
2. 10.1002/j.2168-0159.2014.tb00021.x10.1002/j.2168-0159.2014.tb00021.x ↗
3. 10.1038/srep0685810.1038/srep06858 ↗
4. 10.1109/TED.2018.284641210.1109/TED.2018.2846412 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41928-021-00671-010.1038/s41928-021-00671-0 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0026-2714(97)00157-110.1016/S0026-2714(97)00157-1 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.9617310.1063/1.96173 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.4c2274810.1021/acsami.4c22748 ↗
9. 10.1109/LED.2019.293135810.1109/LED.2019.2931358 ↗
10. 10.1889/JSID18.10.74910.1889/JSID18.10.749 ↗
11. 10.1002/jsid.45210.1002/jsid.452 ↗
12. 10.1063/5.026634910.1063/5.0266349 ↗
13. 10.35848/1882-0786/ada19e10.35848/1882-0786/ada19e ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.03402010.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.034020 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20241183610.1002/adfm.202411836 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20160312610.1002/adma.201603126 ↗
17. 10.1002/aelm.20230041510.1002/aelm.202300415 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.305032310.1063/1.3050323 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41598-019-48552-z10.1038/s41598-019-48552-z ↗
20. 10.1038/srep1346710.1038/srep13467 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.4c0968810.1021/acsami.4c09688 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.4c2159610.1021/acsami.4c21596 ↗
23. 10.1109/LED.2020.298578710.1109/LED.2020.2985787 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.500843510.1063/1.5008435 ↗
25. 10.1002/aelm.20170022110.1002/aelm.201700221 ↗
26. 10.1002/pssr.20230045710.1002/pssr.202300457 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.0c1632510.1021/acsami.0c16325 ↗
28. 10.1063/5.015952910.1063/5.0159529 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41598-019-53766-210.1038/s41598-019-53766-2 ↗
30. 10.1002/smtd.20240057810.1002/smtd.202400578 ↗
31. 10.1039/C5TC04107D10.1039/C5TC04107D ↗
32. 10.1016/j.mser.2024.10080610.1016/j.mser.2024.100806 ↗
33. 10.1002/advs.20210499310.1002/advs.202104993 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41928-025-01380-810.1038/s41928-025-01380-8 ↗
35. 10.1109/LED.2016.263347910.1109/LED.2016.2633479 ↗
36. 10.1002/adma.20120190910.1002/adma.201201909 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsami.7b1067610.1021/acsami.7b10676 ↗
38. 10.1007/s11664-023-10625-110.1007/s11664-023-10625-1 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsaelm.8b0009710.1021/acsaelm.8b00097 ↗
40. 10.1109/LED.2019.290928210.1109/LED.2019.2909282 ↗
41. Kabir, H. M. D., Ahmed, Z., Kariyadan, R., Zhang, L., Chan, M. Modeling of Fringe Current for Semiconductor-Extended Organic TFTs. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Electron Devices Solid-State Circuits 2016; pp 177–180.10.1109/EDSSC.2016.7785238 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0210110.1021/acsnano.4c02101 ↗
43. 10.1063/5.014919910.1063/5.0149199 ↗