journal article·2022-12-27

Plasma Oxidation of Copper: Molecular Dynamics Study with Neural Network Potentials

Yantao Xia, Philippe Sautet

ACS Nano· Volume 16· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

The formation of thin oxide films is of significant scientific and practical interest. In particular, the semiconductor industry is interested in developing a plasma atomic layer etching process to pattern copper, replacing the dual Damascene process. Using a nonthermal oxygen plasma to convert the metallic copper into copper oxide, followed by a formic acid organometallic reaction to etch the copper oxide, this process has shown great promise. However, the current process is not optimal because the plasma oxidation step is not self-limiting, hampering the degree of thickness control. In the present study, a neural network potential for the binary interaction between copper and oxygen is developed and validated against first-principles calculations. This potential covers the entire range of potential energy surfaces of metallic copper, copper oxides, atomic oxygen, and molecular oxygen. The usable kinetic energy ranges from 0 to 20 eV. Using this potential, the plasma oxidation of copper surfaces was studied with large-scale molecular dynamics at atomic resolution, with an accuracy approaching that of the first principle calculations. An amorphous layer of CuO is formed on Cu, with thicknesses reaching 2.5 nm. Plasma is found to create an intense local heating effect that rapidly dissipates across the thickness of the film. The range of this heating effect depends on the kinetic energy of the ions. A higher ion energy leads to a longer range, which sustains faster-than-thermal rates for longer periods of time for the oxide growth. Beyond the range of this agitation, the growth is expected to be limited to the thermally activated rate. High-frequency, repeated ion impacts result in a microannealing effect that leads to a quasicrystalline oxide beneath the amorphized layer. The crystalline layer slows down oxide growth. Growth rate is fitted to the temperature gradient due to ion-induced thermal agitations, to obtain an apparent activation energy of 1.0 eV. A strategy of lowering the substrate temperature and increasing plasma power is proposed as being favorable for more self-limited oxidation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Semiconductor materials and devices · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States

Funding

Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Edelstein D. · International Electron Devices Meeting. IEDM Technical Digest · 1997 · 77310.1109/IEDM.1997.650496 ↗
2. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.22910.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.229 ↗
3. Cheung, R.; Lopatin, S. Method for filling a dual damascene opening having high aspect ratio to minimize electromigration failure, RPX Insight. U.S. Patent, US6245670B1, 2001, https://insight.rpxcorp.com/patent/US6245670B1.
4. 10.1149/2.0021506jss10.1149/2.0021506jss ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0893210.1021/acs.jpcc.0c08932 ↗
6. 10.1116/1.499360210.1116/1.4993602 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.14610310.1103/PhysRevLett.112.146103 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.surfrep.2015.07.00110.1016/j.surfrep.2015.07.001 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.23550210.1103/PhysRevLett.109.235502 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.susc.2016.03.00310.1016/j.susc.2016.03.003 ↗
11. 10.1021/jp507914r10.1021/jp507914r ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467-021-23043-w10.1038/s41467-021-23043-w ↗
13. 10.1039/C9CP05831A10.1039/C9CP05831A ↗
14. 10.1063/1.12260810.1063/1.122608 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.502840710.1063/1.5028407 ↗
16. 10.1002/ppap.20160014510.1002/ppap.201600145 ↗
17. 10.1088/1361-6463/ab1dd310.1088/1361-6463/ab1dd3 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.37013810.1063/1.370138 ↗
19. 10.1116/1.57965910.1116/1.579659 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.336103810.1063/1.3361038 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.246419210.1063/1.2464192 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0090210.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00902 ↗
23. 10.1088/0022-3727/42/19/19401110.1088/0022-3727/42/19/194011 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.699110.1103/PhysRevB.37.6991 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.945810.1103/PhysRevB.42.9458 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.31.526210.1103/PhysRevB.31.5262 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.29.644310.1103/PhysRevB.29.6443 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.272710.1103/PhysRevB.46.2727 ↗
29. 10.1021/j100161a07010.1021/j100161a070 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.12532810.1103/PhysRevB.81.125328 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.mser.2013.07.00110.1016/j.mser.2013.07.001 ↗
32. 10.1021/jp004368u10.1021/jp004368u ↗
33. 10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.1110.1038/npjcompumats.2015.11 ↗
34. 10.1080/14786435.2011.59888110.1080/14786435.2011.598881 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.12530810.1103/PhysRevB.84.125308 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.14640110.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.13640310.1103/PhysRevLett.104.136403 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.78410.1103/PhysRevB.28.784 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.477408410.1063/1.4774084 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.513569610.1063/1.5135696 ↗
41. Magnuson, H.; Frisk, K.Self-Diffusion and Impurity Diffusion of Hydrogen, Oxygen, Sulphur and Phosphorus in Copper; Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, 2014; pp 14–16.
42. 10.1007/BF0265395310.1007/BF02653953 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1203010.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12030 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41467-021-24155-z10.1038/s41467-021-24155-z ↗
45. 10.1039/D1SC04861A10.1039/D1SC04861A ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0132410.1021/acs.chemmater.1c01324 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
49. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
52. Haynes, W. M.CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 97th ed. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2016; pp 5–11, 5–29, 5–30.
53. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.parco.2011.08.00510.1016/j.parco.2011.08.005 ↗
55. 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b0077010.1021/acs.jctc.8b00770 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b0109210.1021/acs.jctc.8b01092 ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0257310.1021/acs.jpcc.0c02573 ↗
58. 10.1021/cr010371d10.1021/cr010371d ↗
59. Campos-Martinez J. · 2008
60. 10.1063/1.493842510.1063/1.4938425 ↗
61. 10.1063/1.47572010.1063/1.475720 ↗
62. 10.1016/S0009-2614(02)01947-410.1016/S0009-2614(02)01947-4 ↗
63. 10.7566/JPSJ.82.09370110.7566/JPSJ.82.093701 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.6910.1103/PhysRevLett.82.69 ↗
65. Xia, Y.; Sautet, P. GitHub, https://github.com/xyttyxy/cuonnppaper/, Accessed on 2022-11-18.10.1109/APSEC57359.2022.00013 ↗