Excitation Intensity- and Size-Dependent Halide Photosegregation in CsPb(I0.5Br0.5)3 Perovskite Nanocrystals
Source abstract
Abstract
Although broad consensus exists that photoirradiation of mixed-halide lead perovskites leads to anion segregation, no model today fully rationalizes all aspects of this near ubiquitous phenomenon. Here, we quantitatively compare experimental, CsPb(I0.5Br0.5)3 nanocrystal (NC) terminal anion photosegregation stoichiometries and excitation intensity thresholds to a band gap-based, thermodynamic model of mixed-halide perovskite photosegregation. Mixed-halide NCs offer strict tests of theory given physical sizes, which dictate local photogenerated carrier densities. We observe that mixed-anion perovskite NCs exhibit significant robustness to photosegregation, with photosegregation propensity decreasing with decreasing NC size. Observed size- and excitation intensity-dependent photosegregation data agree with model predicted size- and excitation intensity-dependent terminal halide stoichiometries. Established correspondence between experiment and theory, in turn, suggests that mixed-halide perovskite photostabilities can be predicted a priori using local gradients of (empirical) Vegard’s law expressions of composition-dependent band gaps.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana46556, United States
CubicPV, 1807 Ross Avenue, STE 333, Dallas, Texas75201, United States
Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana46556, United States
Funding
Basic Energy Sciences · Division of Materials Research
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matt.2019.12.00410.1016/j.matt.2019.12.004 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0247510.1021/acsenergylett.0c02475 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-021-23008-z10.1038/s41467-021-23008-z ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0053910.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00539 ↗
5. 10.3389/felec.2021.71278510.3389/felec.2021.712785 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41563-020-00826-y10.1038/s41563-020-00826-y ↗
7. 10.1039/C4SC03141E10.1039/C4SC03141E ↗
8. 10.1126/science.124398210.1126/science.1243982 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.124316710.1126/science.1243167 ↗
10. 10.1038/srep3568510.1038/srep35685 ↗
11. 10.1039/C8RA09398A10.1039/C8RA09398A ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20150296910.1002/adma.201502969 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0236910.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02369 ↗
14. 10.1364/PRJ.40241110.1364/PRJ.402411 ↗
15. 10.1039/C6EE03014A10.1039/C6EE03014A ↗
16. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0172610.1021/acsenergylett.9b01726 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0079010.1021/acsenergylett.1c00790 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0147410.1021/acsenergylett.0c01474 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.10012010.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100120 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0023910.1021/acsenergylett.7b00239 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0028210.1021/acsenergylett.7b00282 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41566-019-0435-110.1038/s41566-019-0435-1 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0051310.1021/acsaem.8b00513 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0063010.1021/acsenergylett.0c00630 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.07.01110.1016/j.joule.2021.07.011 ↗
26. 10.1021/accountsmr.2c0007610.1021/accountsmr.2c00076 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0200210.1021/acsenergylett.8b02002 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0156210.1021/acsenergylett.8b01562 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41467-017-00284-210.1038/s41467-017-00284-2 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.10012010.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100120 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0022610.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00226 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0445310.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04453 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41467-019-08610-610.1038/s41467-019-08610-6 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.trechm.2020.01.01010.1016/j.trechm.2020.01.010 ↗
35. Suchan, K.; Just, J.; Becker, P.; Rehermann, C.; Merdasa, A.; Mainz, R.; Scheblykin, I. G.; Unger, E.Multi-Stage Phase-Segregation of Mixed Halide Perovskites Under Illumination: A Quantitative Comparison of Experimental Observations and Thermodynamic Models. arXiv (Materials Science), 2205.10867, May 22, 2022, ver. 1. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.10867 (accessed 2022-11-23).
36. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0136910.1021/acsenergylett.8b01369 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0226510.1021/acsenergylett.9b02265 ↗
38. 10.1021/nl504877910.1021/nl5048779 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0000210.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00002 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41467-019-09047-710.1038/s41467-019-09047-7 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0028110.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00281 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0128010.1021/acsenergylett.9b01280 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0038010.1021/acsenergylett.8b00380 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0024710.1021/acsenergylett.9b00247 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0130610.1021/acsenergylett.7b01306 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0120710.1021/acsenergylett.0c01207 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0151210.1021/acs.jpclett.8b01512 ↗
48. 10.1039/C6CP08369B10.1039/C6CP08369B ↗
49. 10.1021/jp981592z10.1021/jp981592z ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0046610.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00466 ↗
51. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0220710.1021/acsenergylett.8b02207 ↗
52. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0175210.1021/acs.jpclett.8b01752 ↗
53. 10.1021/jacs.6b0005510.1021/jacs.6b00055 ↗