In Situ 2D MoS2 Field-Effect Transistors with an Electron Beam Gate
Source abstract
Abstract
We use the beam of a transmission electron microscope (TEM) to modulate in situ the current–voltage characteristics of a two-terminal monolayer molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ) channel fabricated on a silicon nitride substrate. Suppression of the two-dimensional (2D) MoS 2 channel conductance up to 94% is observed when the beam hits and charges the substrate surface. Gate-tunable transistor characteristics dependent on beam current are observed even when the beam is up to tens of microns away from the channel. In contrast, conductance remains constant when the beam passes through a micron-sized hole in the substrate. There is no MoS 2 structural damage during gating, and the conductance reverts to its original value when the beam is turned off. We observe on/off ratios up to ∼60 that are largely independent of beam size and channel length. This TEM field-effect transistor architecture with electron beam gating provides a platform for future in situ electrical measurements.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques · Geotechnical and construction materials studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
Funding
National Human Genome Research Institute · Division of Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation · Division of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems · Division of Materials Research
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature0887910.1038/nature08879 ↗
2. 10.1038/s42254-019-0058-y10.1038/s42254-019-0058-y ↗
3. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0139110.1021/acsnano.5b01391 ↗
4. 10.1038/nature0281710.1038/nature02817 ↗
5. 10.1038/nmat301010.1038/nmat3010 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0243510.1021/acsnano.6b02435 ↗
7. 10.1002/smll.20160425910.1002/smll.201604259 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0004310.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00043 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.04.02510.1016/j.carbon.2012.04.025 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-018-04610-010.1038/s41467-018-04610-0 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0248310.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02483 ↗
12. 10.1021/nl301232t10.1021/nl301232t ↗
13. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0508010.1021/acsnano.7b05080 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2007.10.00710.1016/j.ultramic.2007.10.007 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0141910.1021/acsnano.6b01419 ↗
16. 10.1021/nl202375610.1021/nl2023756 ↗
17. 10.1021/nl501872x10.1021/nl501872x ↗
18. 10.1021/nn507452g10.1021/nn507452g ↗
19. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0738810.1021/acsnano.5b07388 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.6b1148010.1021/acsami.6b11480 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.13680510.1103/PhysRevLett.105.136805 ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20110211110.1002/adfm.201102111 ↗
23. 10.1038/nmat408010.1038/nmat4080 ↗
24. 10.1039/C8TA08152B10.1039/C8TA08152B ↗
25. 10.1038/s41598-017-04350-z10.1038/s41598-017-04350-z ↗
26. Pelleg, J. In Solid Mechanics and Its Applications; Barber, J., Klarbring, A., Eds. Springer: New York, 2016; pp 413–444.10.1007/978-3-319-18437-1_15 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.483003610.1063/1.4830036 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.micron.2004.02.00310.1016/j.micron.2004.02.003 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.11.01610.1016/j.ultramic.2011.11.016 ↗
30. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab596c10.1088/1361-6528/ab596c ↗
31. 10.1109/PVSC.2013.674437710.1109/PVSC.2013.6744377 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.489182410.1063/1.4891824 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.03530110.1103/PhysRevB.88.035301 ↗
34. 10.1039/C7NR07024A10.1039/C7NR07024A ↗
35. 10.1002/sca.495012040610.1002/sca.4950120406 ↗
36. 10.1093/jmicro/54.3.23910.1093/jmicro/54.3.239 ↗
37. 10.1021/nn401429w10.1021/nn401429w ↗
38. 10.1038/nnano.2010.27910.1038/nnano.2010.279 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.480186110.1063/1.4801861 ↗
40. 10.1002/adfm.20190466810.1002/adfm.201904668 ↗
41. 10.1088/2053-1583/aabb7310.1088/2053-1583/aabb73 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0452610.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04526 ↗
43. 10.1021/nl101046t10.1021/nl101046t ↗
44. 10.1021/nn405112m10.1021/nn405112m ↗