journal article·2011-08-23

A Multichannel Model for the Self-Consistent Analysis of Coherent Transport in Graphene Nanoribbons

Davide Mencarelli, Luca Pierantoni, Marco Farina, Andrea Di Donato, Tullio Rozzi

ACS Nano· Volume 5· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

In this contribution, we analyze the multichannel coherent transport in graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) by a scattering matrix approach. We consider the transport properties of GNR devices of a very general form, involving multiple bands and multiple leads. The 2D quantum transport over the whole GNR surface, described by the Schrödinger equation, is strongly nonlinear as it implies calculation of self-generated and externally applied electrostatic potentials, solutions of the 3D Poisson equation. The surface charge density is computed as a balance of carriers traveling through the channel at all of the allowed energies. Moreover, formation of bound charges corresponding to a discrete modal spectrum is observed and included in the model. We provide simulation examples by considering GNR configurations typical for transistor devices and GNR protrusions that find an interesting application as cold cathodes for X-ray generation. With reference to the latter case, a unified model is required in order to couple charge transport and charge emission. However, to a first approximation, these could be considered as independent problems, as in the example.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Biomedica Elettronica e Telecomunicazioni, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60100 Ancona, Italy

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Lin Y.-M. · Science · 2010 · 327 · 66210.1126/science.1184289 ↗
2. Han M. Y. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 20680510.1103/PhysRevLett.98.206805 ↗
3. Li X. · Science · 2008 · 319 · 122910.1126/science.1150878 ↗
4. Stampfer C. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 05640310.1103/PhysRevLett.102.056403 ↗
5. Liu X. · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 12140710.1103/PhysRevB.80.121407 ↗
6. Wakabayashi K. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 339010.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3390 ↗
7. Souma S. · J. Comput. Electron. · 2008 · 7 · 39010.1007/s10825-008-0237-z ↗
8. Brey L. · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 23541110.1103/PhysRevB.73.235411 ↗
9. Horing N. J. M. · J. Phys. A · 2009 · 42 · 22530110.1088/1751-8113/42/22/225301 ↗
10. Fiori G. · IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices · 2008 · 55 · 231410.1109/TED.2008.917329 ↗
11. Wang Z. F. · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 12541710.1103/PhysRevB.74.125417 ↗
12. Ando T. · Phys. Rev. B · 1991 · 44 · 801710.1103/PhysRevB.44.8017 ↗
13. Castro E. V. · Phys. Status Solidi B · 2007 · 244 · 231110.1002/pssb.200674604 ↗
14. Rycerz A. · Phys. Status Solidi A · 2007 · 205 · 128110.1002/pssa.200778166 ↗
15. Akhmerov A. R. · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 08542310.1103/PhysRevB.77.085423 ↗
16. Mencarelli D. · Nanotechnology · 2010 · 21 · 15570110.1088/0957-4484/21/15/155701 ↗
17. Mencarelli D. · Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 16520210.1088/0957-4484/19/16/165202 ↗
18. Eda G. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 23350210.1063/1.3028339 ↗
19. Bocharov G. S. · Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. · 2003 · 5 · 371
20. Sharma M. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2011 · 23 · 055501