journal article·2015-03-24

Band-Gap Deformation Potential and Elasticity Limit of Semiconductor Free-Standing Nanorods Characterized in Situ by Scanning Electron Microscope–Cathodoluminescence Nanospectroscopy

Kentaro Watanabe, Takahiro Nagata, Yutaka Wakayama, Takashi Sekiguchi, Róbert Erdélyi, János Volk

ACS Nano· Volume 9· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Modern field-effect transistors or laser diodes take advantages of band-edge structures engineered by large uniaxial strain εzz, available up to an elasticity limit at a rate of band-gap deformation potential azz (= dEg/dεzz). However, contrary to aP values under hydrostatic pressure, there is no quantitative consensus on azz values under uniaxial tensile, compressive, and bending stress. This makes band-edge engineering inefficient. Here we propose SEM-cathodoluminescence nanospectroscopy under in situ nanomanipulation (Nanoprobe-CL). An apex of a c-axis-oriented free-standing ZnO nanorod (NR) is deflected by point-loading of bending stress, where local uniaxial strain (εcc = r/R) and its gradient across a NR (dεcc/dr = R(-1)) are controlled by a NR local curvature (R(-1)). The NR elasticity limit is evaluated sequentially (εcc = 0.04) from SEM observation of a NR bending deformation cycle. An electron beam is focused on several spots crossing a bent NR, and at each spot the local Eg is evaluated from near-band-edge CL emission energy. Uniaxial acc (= dEg/dεcc) is evaluated at regulated surface depth, and the impact of R(-1) on observed acc is investigated. The acc converges with -1.7 eV to the R(-1) = 0 limit, whereas it quenches with increasing R(-1), which is attributed to free-exciton drift under transversal band-gap gradient. Surface-sensitive CL measurements suggest that a discrepancy from bulk acc = -4 eV may originate from strain relaxation at the side surface under uniaxial stress. The nanoprobe-CL technique reveals an Eg(εij) response to specific strain tensor εij (i, j = x, y, z) and strain-gradient effects on a minority carrier population, enabling simulations and strain-dependent measurements of nanodevices with various structures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · ZnO doping and properties · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

WPI Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics, National Institute for Materials Science, 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan

Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8571, Japan

MTA EK Institute of Technical Physics and Materials Science, Konkoly Thege M. út 29-33, 1121 Budapest, Hungary

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. Bardeen J. · Phys. Rev. · 1950 · 80 · 7210.1103/PhysRev.80.72 ↗
2. Niquet Y.-M. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 354510.1021/nl3010995 ↗
3. Silver M. · IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 1994 · 30 · 54710.1109/3.283803 ↗
4. Signorello G. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 91710.1021/nl303694c ↗
5. Feng J. · Nat. Photonics · 2012 · 6 · 86610.1038/nphoton.2012.285 ↗
6. Wang Z.-L. · Adv. Mater. · 2007 · 19 · 88910.1002/adma.200602918 ↗
7. Thomas D. G. · J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 1960 · 15 · 8610.1016/0022-3697(60)90104-9 ↗
8. Christman J. A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 73 · 385110.1063/1.122914 ↗
9. Bates C. H. · Science · 1962 · 137 · 99310.1126/science.137.3534.993.a ↗
10. Mang A. · Solid State Commun. · 1995 · 94 · 25110.1016/0038-1098(95)00054-2 ↗
11. Segura A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 27810.1063/1.1591995 ↗
12. Shan W. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 15311710.1063/1.1901827 ↗
13. Chen S. J. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 99 · 06610210.1063/1.2177928 ↗
14. Yadav S. K. · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 14412010.1103/PhysRevB.81.144120 ↗
15. Li S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 21310110.1063/1.3435479 ↗
16. Kulkarni A. J. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 10550210.1103/PhysRevLett.97.105502 ↗
17. Agrawal R. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 417710.1021/nl9023885 ↗
18. Agrawal R. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 366810.1021/nl801724b ↗
19. He M.-R. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 12350410.1063/1.3594655 ↗
20. Xu F. · Nano. Res. · 2010 · 3 · 27110.1007/s12274-010-1030-4 ↗
21. Stan G. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 369110.1021/nl071986e ↗
22. Chen C. Q. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 07550510.1103/PhysRevLett.96.075505 ↗
23. Chen C. Q. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 04310510.1063/1.2432289 ↗
24. Hoffmann S. · Nanotechnology · 2007 · 18 · 20550310.1088/0957-4484/18/20/205503 ↗
25. Ni H. · Nanotechnology · 2006 · 17 · 359110.1088/0957-4484/17/14/039 ↗
26. Bai X. D. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 82 · 480610.1063/1.1587878 ↗
27. He M.-L. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 70410.1021/nl2036172 ↗
28. Yan Q. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 26 · 15210510.1063/1.4759107 ↗
29. Adeagbo W. A. · Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 89 · 19513510.1103/PhysRevB.89.195135 ↗
30. Rowe J. E. · Solid State Commun. · 1968 · 6 · 23910.1016/0038-1098(68)90043-4 ↗
31. Langer D. W. · Phys. Rev. B · 1970 · 2 · 400510.1103/PhysRevB.2.4005 ↗
32. Wrzesinski J. · Phys. Rev. B · 1997 · 56 · 1308710.1103/PhysRevB.56.13087 ↗
33. Wei B. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 459510.1021/nl301897q ↗
34. Wei B. · Opt. Exp. · 2014 · 22 · 400010.1364/OE.22.004000 ↗
35. Dietrich C. P. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 03110510.1063/1.3544939 ↗
36. Xu S. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 580210.1021/nl303132c ↗
37. Han X. · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 493710.1002/adma.200900956 ↗
38. Han X. · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 470710.1002/adma.201104372 ↗
39. Liao Z.-M. · Sci. Rep. · 2012 · 2 · 45210.1038/srep00452 ↗
40. Fu X. · Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 257210.1002/adma.201305058 ↗
41. Fu X. · ACS Nano · 2014 · 4 · 341210.1021/nn4062353 ↗
42. Xue H. · Nanotechnology · 2010 · 21 · 21570110.1088/0957-4484/21/21/215701 ↗
43. Park J. B. · Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24 · 45570310.1088/0957-4484/24/45/455703 ↗
44. Reynolds D. C. · 2011 · 51
45. Gupta V. · Proc. 11th IEEE Int. Symp. Appl. Ferroelectr. · 1998 · 113
46. Pikus G. E. · Sov. Phys. Solid State · 1964 · 6 · 261
47. Bateman T. B. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1962 · 33 · 330910.1063/1.1931160 ↗
48. Muth J. F. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 85 · 788410.1063/1.370601 ↗
49. Kanaya K. · J. Phys. D · 1972 · 5 · 4310.1088/0022-3727/5/1/308 ↗
50. Watanabe K. · Opt. Exp. · 2013 · 21 · 1926110.1364/OE.21.019261 ↗
51. Watanabe K. · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2008 · 254 · 773710.1016/j.apsusc.2008.02.013 ↗
52. Nakamura Y. · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2008 · 8 · 301910.1021/cg800139c ↗
53. Watanabe K. · Microscopy · 2014 · 63 · 16110.1093/jmicro/dft050 ↗
54. Liu K. H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 21310510.1063/1.2936080 ↗
55. Nakamura Y. · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2011 · 11 · 330110.1021/cg200609u ↗
56. Minamisawa R. A. · Nat. Commun. · 2012 · 3 · 109610.1038/ncomms2102 ↗
57. Volk J. · Nanoscale Res. Lett. · 2009 · 4 · 69910.1007/s11671-009-9302-1 ↗
58. Watanabe, K.; Oh, S.; Volk, J.; Nagata, T.; Wakayama, Y.; Sekiguchi, T.Multi-Directional Nano-Rods Growths and their Growth Mode Interactions Visualized and Modeled Using SEM-Cathodoluminescence Microscopy.Nat. Commun., to be submitted for publication.