journal article·2014-06-24

Effect of Diameter Variation on Electrical Characteristics of Schottky Barrier Indium Arsenide Nanowire Field-Effect Transistors

Ali Razavieh, Parsian Katal Mohseni, Kyooho Jung, Saumitra Mehrotra, Saptarshi Das, Sergey Suslov, Xiuling Li, Gerhard Klimeck, David B. Janes, Joerg Appenzeller

ACS Nano· Volume 8· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

The effect of diameter variation on electrical characteristics of long-channel InAs nanowire metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors is experimentally investigated. For a range of nanowire diameters, in which significant band gap changes are observed due to size quantization, the Schottky barrier heights between source/drain metal contacts and the semiconducting nanowire channel are extracted considering both thermionic emission and thermally assisted tunneling. Nanowires as small as 10 nm in diameter were used in device geometry in this context. Interestingly, while experimental and simulation data are consistent with a band gap increase for decreasing nanowire diameter, the experimentally determined Schottky barrier height is found to be around 110 meV irrespective of the nanowire diameter. These observations indicate that for nanowire devices the density of states at the direct conduction band minimum impacts the so-called branching point. Our findings are thus distinctly different from bulk-type results when metal contacts are formed on three-dimensional InAs crystals.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Brick Nanotechnology Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47904, United States

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Micro and Nanotechnology Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana—Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Davari B. · Proc. IEEE · 1991 · 83 · 59510.1109/5.371968 ↗
2. Appenzeller J. · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2008 · 55 · 282710.1109/TED.2008.2008011 ↗
3. Takei K. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 500810.1021/nl2030322 ↗
4. Jansson K. · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2012 · 59 · 237510.1109/TED.2012.2204757 ↗
5. Johansson S. · IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. · 2011 · 59 · 273310.1109/TMTT.2011.2163076 ↗
6. Ford A. C. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 134010.1021/nl203895x ↗
7. Chuang S. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 55510.1021/nl3040674 ↗
8. Ford A. C. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 36010.1021/nl803154m ↗
9. Khayer M. A. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 01450210.1063/1.3275502 ↗
10. Khayer M. A. · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2008 · 55 · 293910.1109/TED.2008.2005173 ↗
11. Zhou X. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 05311310.1063/1.2236589 ↗
12. Dayeh S. A. · Small · 2007 · 3 · 32610.1002/smll.200600379 ↗
13. Bryllert T. · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2006 · 27 · 32310.1109/LED.2006.873371 ↗
14. Suyatin D. B. · Nanotechnology · 2007 · 18 · 10530710.1088/0957-4484/18/10/105307 ↗
15. Sourribes M. J. L. · Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24 · 04570310.1088/0957-4484/24/4/045703 ↗
16. Desalvo G. C. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1994 · 141 · 352610.1149/1.2059365 ↗
17. Nishio T. · Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 44570110.1088/0957-4484/22/44/445701 ↗
18. Chueh Y.-L. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 452810.1021/nl802681x ↗
19. Appenzeller J. · IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. · 2002 · 1 · 18410.1109/TNANO.2002.807390 ↗
20. Appenzeller J. · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2005 · 52 · 256810.1109/TED.2005.859654 ↗
21. Appenzeller J. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 92 · 04830110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.048301 ↗
22. Knoch J. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 308210.1063/1.1513657 ↗
23. Zhang M. · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2007 · 28 · 22310.1109/LED.2007.891258 ↗
24. Das S. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 10010.1021/nl303583v ↗
25. Bardeen J. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1947 · 71 · 717
26. Heine V. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1965 · 138 · 1689
27. Yndurain F. · J. Phys. C · 1971 · 4 · 284910.1088/0022-3719/4/17/016 ↗
28. Louie S. G. · Phys. Rev. B · 1976 · 13 · 246110.1103/PhysRevB.13.2461 ↗
29. Tejedor C. · J. Phys. C · 1977 · 10 · 216410.1088/0022-3719/10/12/022 ↗
30. Spicer W. E. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1980 · 44 · 42010.1103/PhysRevLett.44.420 ↗
31. Spicer W. E. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. · 1979 · 16 · 142210.1116/1.570215 ↗
32. Tersoff J. · Phys. Rev. B · 1984 · 30 · 487410.1103/PhysRevB.30.4874 ↗
33. Appelbaum J. A. · Phys. Rev. B · 1975 · 11 · 382210.1103/PhysRevB.11.3822 ↗
34. Goodwin E. T. · Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. · 1939 · 35 · 20510.1017/S0305004100020910 ↗
35. Tersoff J. · Phys. Rev. B · 1985 · 32 · 696810.1103/PhysRevB.32.6968 ↗
36. Luth H. · 1983
37. Boykin T. · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 66 · 12520710.1103/PhysRevB.66.125207 ↗
38. Leonard F. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 469310.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4693 ↗
39. Steiger S. · IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 10 · 146410.1109/TNANO.2011.2166164 ↗
40. Razavieh A. · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2013 · 60 · 207110.1109/TED.2013.2259238 ↗
41. Landauer R. · IBM J. Res. Dev. · 1988 · 32 · 30610.1147/rd.323.0306 ↗
42. Finck D. K. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 12640610.1103/PhysRevLett.110.126406 ↗
43. Dayeh S. A. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 248610.1021/nl0712668 ↗
44. Wibowo E. · J. Appl. Sci. · 2011 · 11 · 131510.3923/jas.2011.1315.1320 ↗