Dipole assisted exciton dissociation at conjugated polymer/fullerene photovoltaic interfaces: A molecular study using density functional theory calculations
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Using density functional theory calculations we probe the electronic structure of the P3HT/fullerene supramolecule. Our simulations indicates that the mix of the polymer and fullerene wave functions give rise to a set of intragap charge transfer (CT) states at the polymer/fullerene interface. This overlap of wavefuctions produces a charge transfer in the ground state. The interaction between this effect and the permanent dipole in the polymer creates a dipole across the supramolecule pointing from the fullerene to the polymer. We find that an efficient exciton dissociation is possible because (i) the CT states are energetically favorable intermediary levels for the electron transfer from the polymer to the fullerene; (ii) there is a potential energy barrier height that blocks the hole transfer to the P3HT chain of the complex, keeping the charge carrier confined in the chain next to the P3HT/fullerene system. This barrier is created by the potential energy of the supramolecule’s dipole moment immersed in the electric field of the electron–hole pair. Finally, using a simple analytical model we show that the dipole’s induced barrier height depends critically on the orientation of the dipole vector relative to the polymer backbone. From this analysis we anticipate the main features of a conjugated polymer/fullerene complex with a high efficiency on exciton dissociation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Sariciftci · Science · 1992 · 258 · 147410.1126/science.258.5087.1474 ↗
2. Koeppe · Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. · 2006 · 5 · 112210.1039/b612933c ↗
3. Hallermann · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 05330710.1063/1.2969295 ↗
4. Arkhipov · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 82 · 460510.1063/1.1586456 ↗
5. Koehler · J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 99 · 05370210.1063/1.2174118 ↗
6. Peumans · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 398 · 2710.1016/j.cplett.2004.09.030 ↗
7. Kanai · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 196710.1021/nl0707095 ↗
8. Shklovskii · 1984
9. Osikowicz · Adv. Mater. · 2007 · 19 · 421310.1002/adma.200700622 ↗
10. S.C. Veenstra, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Groningen, 2002.
11. Ma · J. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2005 · 15 · 161710.1002/adfm.200500211 ↗
12. Vazquez · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 7110.1103/PhysRevB.71.041306 ↗
13. Vazquez · Org. Electron. · 2007 · 8 · 24110.1016/j.orgel.2006.07.006 ↗
14. Drori · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 03740110.1103/PhysRevLett.101.037401 ↗
15. Pope · 1999
16. Belletete · J. Phys. Chem. · 1994 · 98 · 945010.1021/j100089a016 ↗
17. Becke · Phys. Rev. A · 1988 · 38 · 309810.1103/PhysRevA.38.3098 ↗
18. Becke · J. Chem. Phys. · 1993 · 98 · 564810.1063/1.464913 ↗
19. Lee · Phys. Rev. B · 1988 · 37 · 78510.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 ↗
20. Slater · Phys. Rev. · 1951 · 81 · 38510.1103/PhysRev.81.385 ↗
21. Vosko · Can. J. Phys. · 1980 · 58 · 120010.1139/p80-159 ↗
22. Binkley · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1980 · 102 · 93910.1021/ja00523a008 ↗
23. Gordon · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1983 · 104 · 279710.1021/ja00374a017 ↗
24. Hernndez · Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 51 · 1015710.1103/PhysRevB.51.10157 ↗
25. Mizuseki · Synth. Met. · 2003 · 138 · 28110.1016/S0379-6779(02)01289-4 ↗
26. Stephens · J. Phys. Chem. · 1994 · 98 · 1162310.1021/j100096a001 ↗
27. http://www.msg.ameslab.gov/GAMESS/, VERSION 2007 (R1).
28. Yannoni · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1991 · 113 · 319010.1021/ja00008a068 ↗
29. Hawkins · Science · 1991 · 252 · 31210.1126/science.252.5003.312 ↗
30. Beu · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 15541610.1103/PhysRevB.72.155416 ↗
31. Shaw · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 351610.1002/adma.200800982 ↗
32. Kucur · J. Chem. Phys. · 2004 · 120 · 150010.1063/1.1632891 ↗
33. Yang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 128 · 1200710.1021/ja063707f ↗
34. We have also calculated the total energy of the complex as a function of the distance between the fullerene and the polymer that confirmed a minimum energy at around 3.5Å for both (PF and HF) configurations.
35. Those results were obtained by analysing the coeficients of the supramolecular orbitals expansion as a function of the wave functions of each atom in the complex with the help of the EastChem code at http://www.wiki.ed.ac.uk/display/EaStCHEMresearchwiki.
36. Zaho · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2008 · 41 · 15710.1021/ar700111a ↗
37. Henderson · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2008 · 112 · 1253010.1021/jp806573k ↗
38. Champagne · J. Chem. Phys. · 1994 · 100 · 203410.1063/1.466555 ↗