journal article·2007-11-30

Design of Reversible Cross-Linkers for Step and Flash Imprint Lithography Imprint Resists

Frank Palmieri, Jacob Adams, Brian Long, William Heath, Pavlos Tsiartas, C. Grant Willson

ACS Nano· Volume 1· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Progress in the semiconductor manufacturing industry depends upon continuous improvements in the resolution of lithographic patterning through innovative materials development and frequent retooling with expensive optics and radiation sources. Step and Flash Imprint Lithography is a low-cost, nanoimprint lithography process that generates nanopatterned polymeric films via the photopolymerization of low-viscosity solutions containing cross-linking monomers in a transparent template (mold). The highly cross-linked imprint materials are completely insoluble in all inert solvents, which poses a problem for reworking wafers with faulty imprints and cleaning templates contaminated with cured imprint resist. Degradable cross-linkers provide a means of stripping cross-linked polymer networks. The controlled degradation of polymers containing acetal- and tertiary ester-based cross-linkers is demonstrated herein. The viscosity and dose to cure are presented for several prepolymer formulations, along with imprint resolution and tensile modulus results for the cured polymers. Optimum conditions for de-cross-linking and stripping of the cross-linked polymers are presented, including demonstrations of their utility.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation · Advancements in Photolithography Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering

Department of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Resnick D. J. · Proc. SPIE−Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. · 2003 · 5037 · 12
2. Johnson S. C. · Proc. SPIE−Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. · 2003 · 5037 · 197
3. Kim E. K. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B: Microelectron. Nanometer Struct.−Process., Meas., Phenom. · 2004 · 22 · 13110.1116/1.1635849 ↗
4. Le N. V · Microelectron. Eng. · 2005 · 78 · 464
5. Mancini D. P. · Proc. SPIE−Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. · 2004 · 5374 · 371
6. Dickey M. D. · AIChE J. · 2005 · 51 · 254710.1002/aic.10477 ↗
7. Kim E. K. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B: Microelectron. Nanometer Struct.−Process., Meas, Phenom. · 2004 · 22 · 13110.1116/1.1635849 ↗
8. Chen X. · Macromolecules · 2003 · 36 · 180210.1021/ma0210675 ↗
9. De Clercq R. R. · Macromolecules · 1992 · 25 · 110910.1021/ma00029a016 ↗
10. Ogino K. · Chem. Mater. · 1998 · 10 · 383310.1021/cm9801183 ↗
11. Sijbesma R. P. · Science (Washington, D.C.) · 1997 · 278 · 160110.1126/science.278.5343.1601 ↗
12. Shirai M. · Chem. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · 407510.1021/cm0302734 ↗
13. Stockmayer W. H. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1943 · 11 · 4510.1063/1.1723803 ↗
14. Heath W. H. · Macromolecules · 2007
15. McMackin I. · Proc. SPIE−Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. · 2004 · 5374 · 222
16. McMackin I. · Proc. SPIE−Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. · 2003 · 5037 · 178
17. Bailey T. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B: Microelectron. Nanometer Struct. · 2000 · 18 · 357210.1116/1.1324618 ↗
18. Resnick D. J. · Proc. SPIE−Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. · 2002 · 4608 · 176