Local Environment Affects the Activity of Enzymes on a 3D Molecular Scaffold
Source abstract
Abstract
The ability to coordinate and confine enzymes presents an opportunity to affect their performance and to create chemically active materials. Recent studies show that polymers and biopolymers can be used to scaffold enzymes, and that can lead to the modulated biocatalytic efficiency. Here, we investigated the role of microenvironments on enzyme activity using a well-defined molecular scaffold. An enzyme, glucose oxidase (GOx), was positioned at different locations of a three-dimensional (3D) octahedral DNA scaffold (OS), allowing the enzyme's polyanionic environments to be altered. Using electrical sensing, based on a bipolar junction transistor, we measured directly and in real-time the enzyme's proton generation at these different microenvironments. We found a 200% enhancement of immobilized enzyme over free GOx and about a 30% increase in catalytic rates when the enzyme was moved on the same molecular scaffold to a microenvironment with a higher local concentration of polyanions, which suggests a role of local pH on the enzymatic activity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Biosensors and Analytical Detection · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, United States
Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, United States
Center for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, United States
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10589, United States
Funding
Basic Energy Sciences · National Science Foundation
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nnano.2016.5410.1038/nnano.2016.54 ↗
2. 10.1039/c2cs35475f10.1039/c2cs35475f ↗
3. 10.1038/s41929-020-0433-110.1038/s41929-020-0433-1 ↗
4. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0099610.1021/acscatal.5b00996 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.06.01010.1016/j.sbi.2013.06.010 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.09.00510.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.09.005 ↗
7. 10.1039/C7CS00058H10.1039/C7CS00058H ↗
8. 10.1002/cphc.20180085110.1002/cphc.201800851 ↗
9. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0241310.1021/acscatal.9b02413 ↗
10. 10.3390/nano608013910.3390/nano6080139 ↗
11. 10.1038/nprot.2016.13910.1038/nprot.2016.139 ↗
12. 10.1038/nnano.2009.5010.1038/nnano.2009.50 ↗
13. 10.1021/nl902317p10.1021/nl902317p ↗
14. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0800910.1021/acsnano.8b08009 ↗
15. 10.1038/nature0656010.1038/nature06560 ↗
16. 10.1038/nature0650810.1038/nature06508 ↗
17. 10.1038/ncomms791210.1038/ncomms7912 ↗
18. 10.1038/nmat242110.1038/nmat2421 ↗
19. 10.1126/science.aad208010.1126/science.aad2080 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00216-017-0304-z10.1007/s00216-017-0304-z ↗
21. 10.1021/ja307669210.1021/ja3076692 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41467-017-01072-810.1038/s41467-017-01072-8 ↗
23. 10.1021/jacs.5b1019810.1021/jacs.5b10198 ↗
24. 10.1002/smll.20130001910.1002/smll.201300019 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0834510.1021/acsnano.7b08345 ↗
26. 10.1021/ja300897h10.1021/ja300897h ↗
27. 10.1038/ncomms1061910.1038/ncomms10619 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41563-019-0550-x10.1038/s41563-019-0550-x ↗
29. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0574610.1021/acsnano.9b05746 ↗
30. 10.1021/nn402823k10.1021/nn402823k ↗
31. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0176610.1021/acscatal.7b01766 ↗
32. 10.1038/ncomms1398210.1038/ncomms13982 ↗
33. 10.1002/cbic.20160022410.1002/cbic.201600224 ↗
34. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0013010.1021/acscatal.5b00130 ↗
35. 10.1021/cs300766d10.1021/cs300766d ↗
36. 10.1002/bit.2734610.1002/bit.27346 ↗
37. 10.1088/2399-1984/aa656110.1088/2399-1984/aa6561 ↗
38. 10.1038/nnano.2015.10510.1038/nnano.2015.105 ↗
39. 10.1038/nmat457110.1038/nmat4571 ↗
40. 10.1021/jacs.9b0151010.1021/jacs.9b01510 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.490761110.1063/1.4907611 ↗
42. 10.1038/srep4143010.1038/srep41430 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0253010.1021/acsnano.5b02530 ↗
44. Zafar, S.; Ning, T. Bipolar Junction Transistor Based Sensors for Chemical and Biological Sensing. Proceedings of the 2016 46th European Solid-State Device Research Conference (ESSDERC); IEEE: 2016.10.1109/ESSDERC.2016.7599668 ↗
45. 10.1016/S0925-4005(00)00573-610.1016/S0925-4005(00)00573-6 ↗
46. 10.1038/nature0801610.1038/nature08016 ↗
47. 10.1038/nature0458610.1038/nature04586 ↗
48. 10.3390/s809563710.3390/s8095637 ↗
49. 10.1039/b405396f10.1039/b405396f ↗
50. 10.1007/s00253-008-1407-410.1007/s00253-008-1407-4 ↗
51. 10.3390/s11080815210.3390/s110808152 ↗
52. 10.1021/j100382a06810.1021/j100382a068 ↗
53. 10.1021/nn301528h10.1021/nn301528h ↗
54. 10.1002/cbic.20190006610.1002/cbic.201900066 ↗