Electrostatic Landscape of a Hydrogen-Terminated Silicon Surface Probed by a Moveable Quantum Dot
Source abstract
Abstract
With nanoelectronics reaching the limit of atom-sized devices, it has become critical to examine how irregularities in the local environment can affect device functionality. Here, we characterize the influence of charged atomic species on the electrostatic potential of a semiconductor surface at the subnanometer scale. Using noncontact atomic force microscopy, two-dimensional maps of the contact potential difference are used to show the spatially varying electrostatic potential on the (100) surface of hydrogen-terminated highly doped silicon. Three types of charged species, one on the surface and two within the bulk, are examined. An electric field sensitive spectroscopic signature of a single probe atom reports on nearby charged species. The identity of one of the near-surface species has been uncertain in the literature, and we suggest that its character is more consistent with either a negatively charged interstitial hydrogen or a hydrogen vacancy complex.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2J1, Canada
Quantum Silicon, Inc., Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2M9, Canada
Nanotechnology Research Centre, National Research Council Canada, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2M9, Canada
Funding
Compute Canada · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures · Nanotechnology Research Centre, National Research Council Canada · Quantum Silicon Inc.
References (73)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.120172510.1126/science.1201725 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.107676810.1126/science.1076768 ↗
3. 10.1038/3504600010.1038/35046000 ↗
4. 10.1038/nnano.2013.11010.1038/nnano.2013.110 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41467-017-02377-410.1038/s41467-017-02377-4 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41928-018-0180-310.1038/s41928-018-0180-3 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0291910.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02919 ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms267910.1038/ncomms2679 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.16680110.1103/PhysRevLett.121.166801 ↗
10. 10.1038/nnano.2012.2110.1038/nnano.2012.21 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0514910.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05149 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.20530910.1103/PhysRevB.94.205309 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.11330110.1103/PhysRevB.69.113301 ↗
14. 10.1038/nnano.2017.15410.1038/nnano.2017.154 ↗
15. 10.1021/nl400305q10.1021/nl400305q ↗
16. 10.1038/nnano.2012.2010.1038/nnano.2012.20 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.07610110.1103/PhysRevLett.115.076101 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.22680110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.226801 ↗
19. 10.1021/nl500805x10.1021/nl500805x ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.13680410.1103/PhysRevLett.98.136804 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20100227010.1002/adma.201002270 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.02610110.1103/PhysRevLett.115.026101 ↗
23. Ondráček, M.; Hapala, P. Švec, M.; Jelínek, P. Imaging Charge Distribution Within Molecules by Scanning Probe Microscopy - Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy: From Single Charge Detection to Device Characterization; Sadewasser, S., Glatzel, T., Eds. Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2018; pp 499–518.10.1007/978-3-319-75687-5_16 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41563-019-0382-810.1038/s41563-019-0382-8 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.04680510.1103/PhysRevLett.102.046805 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0706810.1021/acsnano.7b07068 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.25680110.1103/PhysRevLett.112.256801 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.24140610.1103/PhysRevB.88.241406 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41467-018-05171-y10.1038/s41467-018-05171-y ↗
30. 10.1126/science.268.5217.159010.1126/science.268.5217.1590 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.11172210.1063/1.111722 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0423810.1021/acsnano.7b04238 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.498974910.1063/1.4989749 ↗
34. 10.1038/ncomms935310.1038/ncomms9353 ↗
35. 10.1126/science.117227310.1126/science.1172273 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.03680110.1103/PhysRevLett.114.036801 ↗
37. 10.1088/0953-8984/26/1/01200110.1088/0953-8984/26/1/012001 ↗
38. 10.1021/jp503410j10.1021/jp503410j ↗
39. 10.1016/j.susc.2014.10.01610.1016/j.susc.2014.10.016 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.332510.1103/PhysRevLett.65.3325 ↗
41. 10.1109/TNANO.2002.80739110.1109/TNANO.2002.807391 ↗
42. 10.1038/nnano.2016.8310.1038/nnano.2016.83 ↗
43. 10.1038/nmat394110.1038/nmat3941 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.133926010.1063/1.1339260 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.15542210.1103/PhysRevB.90.155422 ↗
46. 10.1116/1.369401010.1116/1.3694010 ↗
47. 10.1088/1367-2630/17/7/07302310.1088/1367-2630/17/7/073023 ↗
48. 10.1088/0953-8984/27/15/15420310.1088/0953-8984/27/15/154203 ↗
49. 10.1038/ncomms1325810.1038/ncomms13258 ↗
50. 10.1021/ja301720810.1021/ja3017208 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.07610310.1103/PhysRevLett.101.076103 ↗
52. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/4/04401510.1088/0957-4484/18/4/044015 ↗
53. 10.1088/0034-4885/44/12/00210.1088/0034-4885/44/12/002 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.19530110.1103/PhysRevB.97.195301 ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.11542810.1103/PhysRevB.84.115428 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.03104910.1103/PhysRevX.8.031049 ↗
57. 10.1080/0001873930010147410.1080/00018739300101474 ↗
58. 10.1016/0927-0248(95)00098-410.1016/0927-0248(95)00098-4 ↗
59. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.12520910.1103/PhysRevB.64.125209 ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.76910.1103/PhysRevLett.56.769 ↗
61. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1704010.1103/PhysRevB.49.17040 ↗
62. 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.171810.1103/PhysRevB.52.1718 ↗
63. 10.1016/0921-5107(89)90216-X10.1016/0921-5107(89)90216-X ↗
64. 10.1016/0921-4526(91)90133-Y10.1016/0921-4526(91)90133-Y ↗
65. 10.1557/PROC-104-22910.1557/PROC-104-229 ↗
66. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.59310.1103/PhysRevLett.44.593 ↗
67. 10.1063/1.12294810.1063/1.122948 ↗
68. 10.1063/1.505226410.1063/1.5052264 ↗
69. 10.3762/bjnano.3.2810.3762/bjnano.3.28 ↗
70. 10.1063/1.219853610.1063/1.2198536 ↗
71. 10.1038/ncomms1422210.1038/ncomms14222 ↗
72. 10.1088/0957-4484/7/2/00610.1088/0957-4484/7/2/006 ↗
73. Huff, T.; Dienel, T.; Rashidi, M.; Achal, R.; Livadaru, L.; Croshaw, J.; Wolkow, R. A. Electrostatic Landscape of a H-Silicon Surface Probed by a Moveable Quantum Dot. 2019, arXiv:1902.11296 https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.11296 (accessed August 3, 2019).