journal article·2022-04-11Open access

Analytical study of gradual photovoltaic CuInGaSe2 based solar cell performances

Laboratory for the Development of Renewable Energies and their Applications in Saharan Areas (LDERAS), Faculty of Exact Sciences, University TAHRI Mohammed Béchar, B. Merah, A. Hemmani, Laboratory for the Development of Renewable Energies and their Applications in Saharan Areas (LDERAS), Faculty of Exact Sciences, University TAHRI Mohammed Béchar, H. Khachab, Laboratory for the Development of Renewable Energies and their Applications in Saharan Areas (LDERAS), Faculty of Exact Sciences, University TAHRI Mohammed Béchar

Chalcogenide Letters· Volume 19· Issue 3

Abstract

The most significant challenge for environment and renewable energy researchers is to achieve good performance, as well as cost efficiency in terms of solar generators especially in the PV sector. Regarding the thin film solar cells based on Cu(In,Ga)Se2, the present work dissertation is concerned with the performance of a graded band gap solar cell based on (CIGS). The aim is to determine the influence of physical and geometrical parameters on performance. Results indicate that the increase in electric field resulting from the gradient of the band gap dismantles the effects of surface recombination. The results obtained are an efficiency of 26 % for Eg0=1.67 eV, Eg1=1.02 eV and a thickness of layer p and n d1=1µm, d2=2µm respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Economic Growth and Development

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (11)

Show source-provided references
1. "[1] M. Trovianon, K. Taretto, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells 95, 821 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2010.10.02810.1016/j.solmat.2010.10.028 ↗
2. [2] M. Konagai.Takahashi, Solid Electronics 19, 259 (1976); https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1101(76)90172-610.1016/0038-1101(76)90172-6 ↗
3. [3] Arturo Morales-Acevedo, Energy Procedia 2, 169 (2010).10.1016/j.egypro.2010.07.024 ↗
4. [4] S. Amiri, S. Dehghani, R. Safaiee, Optical and Quantum Electronics 52, 323 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-020-02441-210.1007/s11082-020-02441-2 ↗
5. [5] S. Ouedraogo, R. Sam, F. Ouedraogo, M. B. Kebre, J. M. Ndjaka, F. Zougmore, Journal of Ovonic Research 9(4), 95 (2013).
6. [6] M. Elbar, S. Tobbeche, Energy Procedia 74, 1220 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.76610.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.766 ↗
7. [7] N. Khoshsirat, N. Amziah, Md. Yunus, M. N. Hamidon, S. Shafie, N. Amin, Pertanika J. Sci.& Technol. 23(2), 241 (2015).
8. [8] B. Barman, P. K. Kalita, Solar Energy 216, 329 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.01.03210.1016/j.solener.2021.01.032 ↗
9. [9] Rasika N. Mohottige, Sandanuwan P. Kalawila Vithanage, Journal of Photochemistry & Photobiology, A: Chemistry 407, 113079 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.11307910.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.113079 ↗
10. [10] N. El I Boukortt, S. Patan, Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics 218, 165240 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.16524010.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165240 ↗
11. [11] A. K. Patel, P. K. Rao, R. Mishra, S. K. Soni, Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics 243, 167498 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.167498"10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.167498 ↗