Dynamics of Photogenerated Surface Charge on BiFeO3 Films
Source abstract
Abstract
We report on the spatial and temporal evolution of photoinduced charge generation and carrier separation in heteroepitaxial BiFeO(3) thin films deposited on Nb:SrTiO(3) as measured in ambient at room temperature with Kelvin probe and piezoresponse force microscopy. Contributions from the self-poled and ferroelectric polarization charge are identified from the time evolution of the correlated surface potential and ferroelectric polarization in films as grown and following poling, and at different stages and intensities of optical illumination. Variations in the surface potential with bias voltage, switching history, and illumination intensity indicate how both bulk ferroelectric photovoltaic and the domain wall offset potential mechanisms contribute to the photogenerated charge.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Multiferroics and related materials · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Dielectric properties of ceramics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Choi T. · Science · 2009 · 324 · 6310.1126/science.1168636 ↗
2. Yang S. Y. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2010 · 5 · 14310.1038/nnano.2009.451 ↗
3. Alexe M. · Nat. Commun. · 2011 · 2 · Art. No. 25610.1038/ncomms1261 ↗
4. Huang H. · Nat. Photonics · 2010 · 4 · 13410.1038/nphoton.2010.15 ↗
5. Ji W. · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 176310.1002/adma.200902985 ↗
6. Shao R. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 11290410.1063/1.2348776 ↗
7. Ihlefeld J. F. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 14290810.1063/1.2901160 ↗
8. Spadafora E. J. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 333710.1021/nl101001d ↗
9. Liscio A. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2010 · 43 · 54110.1021/ar900247p ↗
10. Sinensky A. K. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2007 · 2 · 65310.1038/nnano.2007.293 ↗
11. Kim Y. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 03290710.1063/1.3046786 ↗
12. Kalinin S. · Nano Lett. · 2004 · 4 · 55510.1021/nl0350837 ↗
13. Liscio A. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2006 · 16 · 140710.1002/adfm.200600145 ↗
14. Qu T. L. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 17350710.1063/1.3584031 ↗
15. Yang H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 10211310.1063/1.2896302 ↗
16. Watanabe Y. · Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 57 · R556310.1103/PhysRevB.57.R5563 ↗
17. Tanaka H. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 88 · 02720410.1103/PhysRevLett.88.027204 ↗
18. Schultz A. M. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2011 · 3 · 156210.1021/am200127c ↗
19. Wu W. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 104 · 21760110.1103/PhysRevLett.104.217601 ↗
20. Unold T. · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2011 · 41 · 29710.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100437 ↗
21. Clark S. J. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 02290210.1063/1.3070532 ↗
22. Seidel J. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107 · 12680510.1103/PhysRevLett.107.126805 ↗
23. Wong M. F. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 23210310.1063/1.3521281 ↗
24. Chen X. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B · 1999 · 17 · 193010.1116/1.590851 ↗
25. Spanier J. · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 73510.1021/nl052538e ↗
26. Nonnenmann S. · J. Mater. Sci. · 2009 · 44 · 520510.1007/s10853-009-3680-8 ↗