Nanostructured Surfaces Frustrate Polymer Semiconductor Molecular Orientation
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanostructured grating surfaces with groove widths less than 200 nm impose boundary conditions that frustrate the natural molecular orientational ordering within thin films of blended polymer semiconductor poly(3-hexlythiophene) and phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester, as revealed by grazing incidence X-ray scattering measurements. Polymer interactions with the grating sidewall strongly inhibit the polymer lamellar alignment parallel to the substrate typically found in planar films, in favor of alignment perpendicular to this orientation, resulting in a preferred equilibrium molecular configuration difficult to achieve by other means. Grating surfaces reduce the relative population of the parallel orientation from 30% to less than 5% in a 400 nm thick film. Analysis of in-plane X-ray scattering with respect to grating orientation shows polymer backbones highly oriented to within 10 degrees of parallel to the groove direction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, United States
Condensed Matter Physics & Materials Science Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, United States
Department of Physics & Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11790, United States
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Kline R. · Nat. Mater. · 2006 · 5 · 22210.1038/nmat1590 ↗
2. Sirringhaus H. · Nature · 1999 · 401 · 68510.1038/44359 ↗
3. Sirringhaus H. · Science · 1998 · 280 · 174110.1126/science.280.5370.1741 ↗
4. Yu G. · Science · 1995 · 270 · 178910.1126/science.270.5243.1789 ↗
5. Kline R. J. · Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.) · 2003 · 15 · 151910.1002/adma.200305275 ↗
6. Kline R. J. · Macromolecules · 2005 · 38 · 331210.1021/ma047415f ↗
7. Meijer E. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 483110.1063/1.1559933 ↗
8. Sirringhaus H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 77 · 40610.1063/1.126991 ↗
9. Erb T. · Thin Solid Films · 2004 · 450 · 9710.1016/j.tsf.2003.10.045 ↗
10. DeLongchamp D. M. · Chem. Mater. · 2005 · 17 · 561010.1021/cm0513637 ↗
11. Yang H. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2005 · 15 · 67110.1002/adfm.200400297 ↗
12. Verploegen E. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2010 · 20 · 351910.1002/adfm.201000975 ↗
13. Smilgies D. M. · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2009 · 42 · 103010.1107/S0021889809040126 ↗
14. Hlaing H. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 753210.1021/nn202515z ↗
15. Kushida T. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 063304-310.1063/1.3553481 ↗
16. Johnston D. A. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 8 · 418110.1021/nl301759j ↗
17. Aryal M. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 308510.1021/nn900831m ↗
18. Yang Y. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 287710.1021/nn3001388 ↗
19. Coakley K. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2005 · 15 · 192710.1002/adfm.200500364 ↗
20. Allen J. E. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 16330110.1063/1.3651509 ↗
21. Allen J. E. · J. Photonics Energy · 2012 · 2 · 021008110.1117/1.JPE.2.021008 ↗
22. Scavia G. · Surf. Sci. · 2008 · 602 · 310610.1016/j.susc.2008.08.009 ↗
23. Xiao X. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2009 · 113 · 1460410.1021/jp9064505 ↗
24. Singh C. R. · J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. · 2013 · 51 · 94310.1002/polb.23297 ↗
25. Baker J. L. · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 914610.1021/la904840q ↗