journal article·2014-01-28

Nanostructured Surfaces Frustrate Polymer Semiconductor Molecular Orientation

Danvers E. Johnston, Kevin G. Yager, Htay Hlaing, Xinhui Lu, Benjamin M. Ocko, Charles T. Black

ACS Nano· Volume 8· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Nanostructured grating surfaces with groove widths less than 200 nm impose boundary conditions that frustrate the natural molecular orientational ordering within thin films of blended polymer semiconductor poly(3-hexlythiophene) and phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester, as revealed by grazing incidence X-ray scattering measurements. Polymer interactions with the grating sidewall strongly inhibit the polymer lamellar alignment parallel to the substrate typically found in planar films, in favor of alignment perpendicular to this orientation, resulting in a preferred equilibrium molecular configuration difficult to achieve by other means. Grating surfaces reduce the relative population of the parallel orientation from 30% to less than 5% in a 400 nm thick film. Analysis of in-plane X-ray scattering with respect to grating orientation shows polymer backbones highly oriented to within 10 degrees of parallel to the groove direction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, United States

Condensed Matter Physics & Materials Science Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, United States

Department of Physics & Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11790, United States

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Kline R. · Nat. Mater. · 2006 · 5 · 22210.1038/nmat1590 ↗
2. Sirringhaus H. · Nature · 1999 · 401 · 68510.1038/44359 ↗
3. Sirringhaus H. · Science · 1998 · 280 · 174110.1126/science.280.5370.1741 ↗
4. Yu G. · Science · 1995 · 270 · 178910.1126/science.270.5243.1789 ↗
5. Kline R. J. · Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.) · 2003 · 15 · 151910.1002/adma.200305275 ↗
6. Kline R. J. · Macromolecules · 2005 · 38 · 331210.1021/ma047415f ↗
7. Meijer E. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 483110.1063/1.1559933 ↗
8. Sirringhaus H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 77 · 40610.1063/1.126991 ↗
9. Erb T. · Thin Solid Films · 2004 · 450 · 9710.1016/j.tsf.2003.10.045 ↗
10. DeLongchamp D. M. · Chem. Mater. · 2005 · 17 · 561010.1021/cm0513637 ↗
11. Yang H. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2005 · 15 · 67110.1002/adfm.200400297 ↗
12. Verploegen E. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2010 · 20 · 351910.1002/adfm.201000975 ↗
13. Smilgies D. M. · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2009 · 42 · 103010.1107/S0021889809040126 ↗
14. Hlaing H. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 753210.1021/nn202515z ↗
15. Kushida T. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 063304-310.1063/1.3553481 ↗
16. Johnston D. A. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 8 · 418110.1021/nl301759j ↗
17. Aryal M. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 308510.1021/nn900831m ↗
18. Yang Y. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 287710.1021/nn3001388 ↗
19. Coakley K. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2005 · 15 · 192710.1002/adfm.200500364 ↗
20. Allen J. E. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 16330110.1063/1.3651509 ↗
21. Allen J. E. · J. Photonics Energy · 2012 · 2 · 021008110.1117/1.JPE.2.021008 ↗
22. Scavia G. · Surf. Sci. · 2008 · 602 · 310610.1016/j.susc.2008.08.009 ↗
23. Xiao X. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2009 · 113 · 1460410.1021/jp9064505 ↗
24. Singh C. R. · J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. · 2013 · 51 · 94310.1002/polb.23297 ↗
25. Baker J. L. · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 914610.1021/la904840q ↗