ZnO/ZnS sensor with broadband visible response for flexible polyethylene terephthalate substrates combined with artificial intelligence analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
This study focuses on the development of zinc oxide (ZnO)/zinc sulfide (ZnS) core-shell structures on flexible polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrates for enhanced light sensing. PET offers high elasticity, optical transparency, and chemical resistance, making it ideal for wearable optoelectronics. By optimizing the vulcanization process, a uniform ZnS shell is formed on the exposed regions of ZnO nanorods (NRs), significantly enhancing ZnO-based sensor’s sensitivity to visible light, especially red light (peak wavelength at 630 nm). Structural and spectral analyses confirm the successful formation of the ZnO/ZnS heterostructure, improved charge separation, and broadened light response. To improve data processing and classification accuracy, a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) is applied to analyze the time-series signals from the sensor. The model achieves 100% training accuracy and nearly perfect performance on the test set, as shown in the confusion matrices. This demonstrates strong generalization and stable classification across different light conditions. The integration of nanomaterial engineering and AI-assisted analysis highlights a promising strategy for future development of intelligent, flexible, and high-performance optical sensing systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. [1] Peng, M., Z. Wen, X. Sun, Advanced Functional Materials, 2023. 33(11): p. 2211548; https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20221154810.1002/adfm.202211548 ↗
2. [2] Yoo, H., et al., Advanced Materials, 2021. 33(47): p. 2006091; https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20200609110.1002/adma.202006091 ↗
3. [3] Benyahia, K., et al., Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2021. 859: p. 158242; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15824210.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158242 ↗
4. [4] Suguna, A., et al., Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 2023. 34(23): p. 1655; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-023-11059-510.1007/s10854-023-11059-5 ↗
5. [5] Tran, M.H., J. Hur, EcoMat, 2023. 5(3): p. e12301; https://doi.org/10.1002/eom2.1230110.1002/eom2.12301 ↗
6. [6] Pavelyev, V., et al., Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 2022. 33(32): p. 24397-24433; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022-09204-710.1007/s10854-022-09204-7 ↗
7. [7] Cheng, C.-C., et al., RSC Advances, 2018. 8(46): p. 26341-26348; https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA04968H10.1039/C8RA04968H ↗
8. [8] Chen, C.-C., et al., Sensors and Materials, 2019. 31(3): p. 1083-1089; https://doi.org/10.18494/SAM.2019.222810.18494/SAM.2019.2228 ↗
9. [9] ElFaham, M.M., A.M. Mostafa, E.A. Mwafy, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 2021. 154: p. 110089; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.11008910.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110089 ↗
10. [10] Bayda, S., et al., Molecules, 2019. 25(1): p. 112; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2501011210.3390/molecules25010112 ↗
11. [11] Cui, Q., et al., Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2023. 142: p. 104679; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2023.10467910.1016/j.jtice.2023.104679 ↗
12. [12] Sarkar, S., A.D. Mahapatra, D. Basak, Journal of colloid and interface science, 2018. 523: p. 245-253; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.03.11010.1016/j.jcis.2018.03.110 ↗