Wafer-Scale Nanoprinting of 3D Interconnects beyond Cu
Source abstract
Abstract
Cloud operations and services, as well as many other modern computing tasks, require hardware that is run by very densely packed integrated circuits (ICs) and heterogenous ICs. The performance of these ICs is determined by the stability and properties of the interconnects between the semiconductor devices and ICs. Although some ICs with 3D interconnects are commercially available, there has been limited progress on 3D printing utilizing emerging nanomaterials. Moreover, laying out reliable 3D metal interconnects in ICs with the appropriate electrical and physical properties remains challenging. Here, we propose high-throughput 3D interconnection with nanoscale precision by leveraging lines of forces. We successfully nanoprinted multiscale and multilevel Au, Ir, and Ru 3D interconnects on the wafer scale in non-vacuum conditions using a pulsed electric field. The ON phase of the pulsed field initiates in situ printing of nanoparticle (NP) deposition into interconnects, whereas the OFF phase allows the gas flow to evenly distribute the NPs over an entire wafer. Characterization of the 3D interconnects confirms their excellent uniformity, electrical properties, and free-form geometries, far exceeding those of any 3D-printed interconnects. Importantly, their measured resistances approach the theoretical values calculated here. The results demonstrate that 3D nanoprinting can be used to fabricate thinner and faster interconnects, which can enhance the performance of dense ICs; therefore, 3D nanoprinting can complement lithography and resolve the challenges encountered in the fabrication of critical device features.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Copper Interconnects and Reliability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, 393 Middle Huaxia Road, Shanghai 201210, China
Funding
ShanghaiTech University · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Zhangjiang Laboratory
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41586-024-07146-010.1038/s41586-024-07146-0 ↗
2. 10.1038/s42254-024-00691-710.1038/s42254-024-00691-7 ↗
3. Dukes, S.; Bresniker, K. Systems and architectures. 2021 IEEE International Roadmap for Devices and Systems Outbriefs; IEEE: 2021; pp 1–23.10.1109/IRDS54852.2021.00009 ↗
4. Li Y. · 2020 · 64
5. 10.1038/s41928-021-00672-z10.1038/s41928-021-00672-z ↗
6. 10.1038/s44287-024-00038-510.1038/s44287-024-00038-5 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41563-022-01383-210.1038/s41563-022-01383-2 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41565-023-01399-y10.1038/s41565-023-01399-y ↗
9. 10.1038/nature2299410.1038/nature22994 ↗
10. Badaroglu, M. More Moore. 2021 IEEE International Roadmap for Devices and Systems Outbriefs; IEEE, 2021; pp 01–38.10.1109/IRDS54852.2021.00010 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41928-020-0460-610.1038/s41928-020-0460-6 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41928-023-01064-110.1038/s41928-023-01064-1 ↗
13. Rudan M. · 2022
14. Hoefflinger B. · 2011 · 16110.1007/978-3-642-23096-7_7 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.513367110.1063/1.5133671 ↗
16. Hu, C. K.; Kelly, J.; Chen, J. H. C.; Huang, H.; Ostrovski, Y.; Patlolla, R.; Peethala, B.; Adusumilli, P.; Spooner, T.; Gignac, L. M.; Bruley, J.; Breslin, C.; Cohen, S. A.; Lian, G.; Ali, M.; Long, R.; Hornicek, G.; Kane, T.; Kamineni, V.; Zhang, X.; Mont, F.; Siddiqui, S. In Electromigration and resistivity in on-chip Cu, Co and Ru damascene nanowires. 2017 IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference (IITC); IEEE. 2017; pp 1–3.10.1109/IITC-AMC.2017.7968977 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.329202210.1063/1.3292022 ↗
18. 10.1116/1.489445310.1116/1.4894453 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.37208210.1063/1.372082 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.499208910.1063/1.4992089 ↗
21. Markussen, T.; Aboud, S.; Blom, A.; Lanzillo, N. A.; Gunst, T.; Cobb, J.; Philip, T. M.; Robison, R. R. In Grain boundary scattering in Ru and Cu interconnects. 2020 IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference (IITC); IEEE, 2020; pp 76–78.10.1109/IITC47697.2020.9515604 ↗
22. 10.1109/TED.2021.310508610.1109/TED.2021.3105086 ↗
23. 10.1109/LED.2013.229178310.1109/LED.2013.2291783 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.04543210.1103/PhysRevB.86.045432 ↗
25. 10.1109/TNANO.2016.263558310.1109/TNANO.2016.2635583 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20231465310.1002/adfm.202314653 ↗
27. 10.1002/adfm.20231083810.1002/adfm.202310838 ↗
28. Ren, H.; Wu, Z.; Bekiaris, N.; Tseng, J.; How, G.; Xie, X.; Lei, W.; Tao, R.; Shaviv, R.; Lee, J. J.; Vinnakota, R.; Kashefizadeh, K.; Gage, M.; Naik, M. In Resistance scaling of Cu interconnect and alternate metal (Co, Ru) benchmark toward sub 10nm dimension. 2018 IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference (IITC); IEEE; 2018; pp 166–168.10.1109/IITC.2018.8430411 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0105410.1021/acs.chemmater.1c01054 ↗
30. 10.1109/JEDS.2023.329229810.1109/JEDS.2023.3292298 ↗
31. 10.1002/adfm.20220778110.1002/adfm.202207781 ↗
32. 10.1063/5.006084510.1063/5.0060845 ↗
33. 10.1063/5.001373710.1063/5.0013737 ↗
34. 10.1007/s41871-018-0016-910.1007/s41871-018-0016-9 ↗
35. 10.1515/aot-2015-003610.1515/aot-2015-0036 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41586-021-03353-110.1038/s41586-021-03353-1 ↗
37. 10.1002/adma.20160421110.1002/adma.201604211 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.04.06210.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.04.062 ↗
39. 10.1002/advs.20210462310.1002/advs.202104623 ↗
40. 10.1126/science.116837510.1126/science.1168375 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0138310.1021/acsnano.5b01383 ↗
42. 10.1002/admt.20250008310.1002/admt.202500083 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.494221610.1063/1.4942216 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41467-023-40577-310.1038/s41467-023-40577-3 ↗
45. 10.1002/adma.20200435610.1002/adma.202004356 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10662710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106627 ↗
47. 10.1063/1.182623710.1063/1.1826237 ↗
48. 10.1134/S106378421806018X10.1134/S106378421806018X ↗
49. 10.1023/A:102195670396710.1023/A:1021956703967 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11689610.1016/j.actamat.2021.116896 ↗
51. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0242110.1021/acs.langmuir.9b02421 ↗
52. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0650310.1021/acs.jpcc.5b06503 ↗
53. Hinds W. C. · 2022
54. Neisser, M.; Levinson, H. J.; Wurm, S.; Kyser, D.; Watanabe, T.; Macwilliams, K.; Ishiuchi, H.; Trybula, W.; Hayashi, N.; Fedynyshyn, T. In Lithography. 2021 IEEE International Roadmap for Devices and Systems Outbriefs; IEEE: 2021; pp 1–11.10.1109/IRDS54852.2021.00017 ↗
55. 10.1038/nmat410510.1038/nmat4105 ↗
56. 10.1038/s41563-022-01327-w10.1038/s41563-022-01327-w ↗
57. 10.1002/adfm.20230873410.1002/adfm.202308734 ↗
58. 10.1038/530144a10.1038/530144a ↗
59. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.07.02710.1016/j.matt.2020.07.027 ↗
60. 10.1080/02786826.2018.142785210.1080/02786826.2018.1427852 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10243210.1016/j.addma.2021.102432 ↗
62. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.5.05401810.1103/PhysRevApplied.5.054018 ↗
63. 10.1063/1.147386810.1063/1.1473868 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.1421510.1103/PhysRevB.61.14215 ↗
65. 10.1002/adma.20100023610.1002/adma.201000236 ↗
66. 10.1063/1.293708510.1063/1.2937085 ↗
67. 10.1103/physrevlett.120.18610210.1103/physrevlett.120.186102 ↗
68. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.13410910.1103/PhysRevB.74.134109 ↗
69. 10.1103/PhysRevB.1.138210.1103/PhysRevB.1.1382 ↗
70. 10.1080/0001873520010115110.1080/00018735200101151 ↗