journal article·2024-08-20

Nonideality in Arrayed Carbon Nanotube Field Effect Transistors Revealed by High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy

Bo Wang, Haozhe Lu, Sujuan Ding, Yumeng Ze, Yifan Liu, Zixuan Zhang, Huimin Yin, Bing Gao, Yichen Li, Liu He, Yuanhao Kou, Zhiyong Zhang, Chuanhong Jin

ACS Nano· Volume 18· Issue 33
Publisher page

Abstract

High density and high semiconducting-purity single-walled carbon nanotube array (A-CNT) have recently been demonstrated as promising candidates for high-performance nanoelectronics. Knowledge of the structures and arrangement of CNTs within the arrays and their interfaces to neighboring CNTs, metal contacts, and dielectrics, as the key components of an A-CNT field effect transistor (FET), is essential for device mechanistic understanding and further optimization, particularly considering that the current technologies for the fabrication of A-CNT wafers are mainly laboratory-level solution-based processes. Here, we conduct a systematic investigation into the microstructures of A-CNT FETs mainly via cross-sectional high-resolution transmission electron microscopy and tentatively establish a framework consisting of up to 11 parameters which can be used for structure-side quality evaluation of the A-CNT FETs. The parameter ensemble includes the diameter, length (or terminal), and density distribution of CNTs, radial deformation of CNTs, array alignment defects, surface crystallography facets of contact metal, thickness distribution of high-k dielectrics (HfO 2 ), and the contact ratios for the CNT–CNT, CNT–metal, CNT–dielectric, and CNT–substrate interfaces. Enriched array alignment defects, i.e., bundle, stacking, misorientation, and voids, are observed with a total ratio sometimes up to ∼90% in pristine A-CNTs and even up to ∼95% after the device fabrication process. Thus, they are suggested as the prevalent performance-limiting factors for A-CNT FETs. Complex interfacial structures are observed at the CNT–CNT, CNT–metal contact, and CNT–high-k dielectric interfaces, making the local environment and the property of each component CNT involved in an A-CNT FET distinct from others in terms of the diameters, radial deformation, and interactions with the local surroundings (mainly through van der Waals interactions). The present study suggests further improvements on the fabrication technology of A-CNT wafers and devices and mechanistic investigations into the impacts of complex array alignment defects and interface structures on the electrical performance of A-CNT FETs as well.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Silicon and Advanced Semiconductor Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310027, China

Jihua Laboratory, Foshan, Guangdong 528200, China

Key Laboratory for the Physics and Chemistry of Nanodevices and Center for Carbon-Based Electronics, School of Electronics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · Jihua Laboratory · Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nn503627h10.1021/nn503627h ↗
2. 10.1038/498443a10.1038/498443a ↗
3. 10.1021/nn502436310.1021/nn5024363 ↗
4. 10.1093/nsr/nwad26110.1093/nsr/nwad261 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41928-019-0330-210.1038/s41928-019-0330-2 ↗
6. 10.1038/nature0179710.1038/nature01797 ↗
7. 10.1021/nl801880210.1021/nl8018802 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.aan247610.1126/science.aan2476 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.aaj162810.1126/science.aaj1628 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.aac800610.1126/science.aac8006 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41928-023-00983-310.1038/s41928-023-00983-3 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0282710.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02827 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.aba598010.1126/science.aba5980 ↗
14. 10.1126/sciadv.abh064010.1126/sciadv.abh0640 ↗
15. Li, S.; Chao, T.A.; Gilardi, C.; Safron, N.; Su, S.K.; Zeevi, G.; Bechdolt, A. D.; Passlack, M.; Oberoi, A.; Lin, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, K.; Kashyap, H.; Liew, S.L. High-Performance and Low Parasitic Capacitance CNT MOSFET: 1.2 mA/Μm at VDS of 0.75 V by Self-Aligned Doping in Sub-20 Nm Spacer. 2023 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM); San Francisco, CA, USA, 2023.10.1109/IEDM45741.2023.10413827 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsnano.2c1000710.1021/acsnano.2c10007 ↗
17. 10.1126/sciadv.160124010.1126/sciadv.1601240 ↗
18. 10.1063/5.003108210.1063/5.0031082 ↗
19. Zhang, J.; Patil, N.; Philip Wong, H.S.; Mitra, S. Overcoming Carbon Nanotube Variations through Co-Optimized Technology and Circuit Design. 2011 International Electron Devices Meeting; IEEE: Washington, DC, USA, 2011, pp 4.6.1–4.6.4.10.1109/IEDM.2011.6131490 ↗
20. 10.1109/TED.2008.201060410.1109/TED.2008.2010604 ↗
21. Deng, J.; Patil, N.; Ryu, K.; Badmaev, A.; Zhou, C.; Mitra, S.; Wong, H.S. P. Carbon Nanotube Transistor Circuits: Circuit-Level Performance Benchmarking and Design Options for Living with Imperfections. 2007 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Digest of Technical Papers, 2007; pp 70–588.10.1109/ISSCC.2007.373592 ↗
22. 10.1109/TCAD.2012.218752710.1109/TCAD.2012.2187527 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.496243910.1063/1.4962439 ↗
24. 10.1039/C6NR01012A10.1039/C6NR01012A ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.08550110.1103/PhysRevLett.114.085501 ↗
26. 10.1021/nl501264610.1021/nl5012646 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.20770110.1103/PhysRevLett.119.207701 ↗
28. 10.1109/ted.2007.90204710.1109/ted.2007.902047 ↗
29. Ahmed, Z. Modeling Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Distribution Variations in CNTFETs. Ph.D. Thesis, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Hong Kong), 2016.
30. 10.1021/nl803008610.1021/nl8030086 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0434610.1021/acsnano.3c04346 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.23680210.1103/PhysRevLett.111.236802 ↗
33. 10.1109/TCAD.2011.212101010.1109/TCAD.2011.2121010 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.15541010.1103/PhysRevB.65.155410 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.206769710.1063/1.2067697 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.1387410.1103/PhysRevB.60.13874 ↗
37. 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.70310.1103/RevModPhys.87.703 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.15541110.1103/PhysRevB.65.155411 ↗
39. 10.1038/3509910.1038/35099 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.469310.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4693 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.10680110.1103/PhysRevLett.89.106801 ↗
42. 10.1038/sdata.2016.8010.1038/sdata.2016.80 ↗
43. 10.1021/nl073081710.1021/nl0730817 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00322-510.1016/S0008-6223(00)00322-5 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.03410.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.034 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.370359510.1063/1.3703595 ↗
47. 10.1021/ja071114e10.1021/ja071114e ↗
48. 10.1038/nnano.2012.25710.1038/nnano.2012.257 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsnano.3c1224310.1021/acsnano.3c12243 ↗