Low‐Temperature Topotactic Control of a Double Exchange Interaction in an La 0.5 Sr 0.5 CoO 3 Oxygen Sponge Facilitates the Development of Ultra‐Sensitive and Stable Correlated Oxygen Sensors
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Exotic oxygen‐driven control of quantum‐mechanical properties has attracted considerable attention for the oxygen sensors since it can give superior sensitivity to conventional sensors. Here, it is shown that La 0.5 Sr 0.5 CoO 3 oxygen sponges simultaneously exhibit a huge change of resistance by three orders of magnitude, a reversible modulation of ferromagnetic ordering, stability, and reusability when the films in vacuum and oxygen is successively annealed. The correlated oxygen sensors work at lower temperatures (175−250 °C) and within a shorter timeframe (8−30 minutes) compared with conventional oxygen sensors working above 500 °C. The oxygen‐driven control starts softly via oxygen‐vacancy‐driven relaxation of double exchange interaction in the perovskite La 0.5 Sr 0.5 CoO 3 , which is further amplified with the topotactic transition into brownmillerite La 0.5 Sr 0.5 CoO 2.5 . This more facile transition is attributable to oxygen‐driven filling of correlated electrons in Co 3 d ‐orbitals and successive destabilization of CoO 6 octahedra into CoO 4 tetrahedra. The La 0.5 Sr 0.5 CoO 3 oxygen sponges with ionic‐electric‐magnetic coupling constitute a proof‐of‐principle demonstration that ultra‐sensitive and stable oxygen sensors can be achieved.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics and Chemistry DGIST Daegu 42988 Republic of Korea
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0925-4005(97)00295-510.1016/S0925-4005(97)00295-5 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10832-004-5179-710.1007/s10832-004-5179-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.snb.2007.12.04510.1016/j.snb.2007.12.045 ↗
4. 10.1063/5.009420510.1063/5.0094205 ↗
5. 10.1038/nature1765310.1038/nature17653 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41560-022-01166-810.1038/s41560-022-01166-8 ↗
7. 10.1038/nmat449310.1038/nmat4493 ↗
8. 10.1002/adfm.20200148910.1002/adfm.202001489 ↗
9. 10.1002/lpor.20200044410.1002/lpor.202000444 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c0148710.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01487 ↗
11. 10.1002/inf2.1239010.1002/inf2.12390 ↗
12. 10.1038/nmat373610.1038/nmat3736 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20160656610.1002/adma.201606566 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20180618310.1002/adma.201806183 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20190198410.1002/adfm.201901984 ↗
16. 10.1088/1361-6463/ab6bef10.1088/1361-6463/ab6bef ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.11861610.1016/j.actamat.2022.118616 ↗
18. 10.1038/nmat465910.1038/nmat4659 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0436010.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04360 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.496438410.1063/1.4964384 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.129010.1103/PhysRevB.56.1290 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41467-023-38312-z10.1038/s41467-023-38312-z ↗
23. 10.1006/jssc.1995.135110.1006/jssc.1995.1351 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.17440810.1103/PhysRevB.67.174408 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0524310.1021/acsnano.2c05243 ↗
26. 10.1006/jssc.1998.796310.1006/jssc.1998.7963 ↗
27. 10.1039/a801796d10.1039/a801796d ↗
28. 10.1002/pssa.20190084810.1002/pssa.201900848 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41467-021-22790-010.1038/s41467-021-22790-0 ↗
30. 10.1016/0022-3697(58)90107-010.1016/0022-3697(58)90107-0 ↗
31. 10.1063/5.019664610.1063/5.0196646 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.17441610.1103/PhysRevB.82.174416 ↗
33. 10.1038/srep0612410.1038/srep06124 ↗
34. Fox M. · 2010
35. 10.1002/adma.20200760610.1002/adma.202007606 ↗
36. 10.1006/jssc.1996.023110.1006/jssc.1996.0231 ↗