journal article·2024-12Open access

A Two‐Step Dry Etching Model for Non‐Uniform Etching Profile in Gate‐All‐Around Field‐Effect Transistor Manufacturing

Ziyi Hu, Junjie Li, Rui Chen, Dashan Shang, Yayi Wei, Zhongrui Wang, Ling Li, Lado Filipovic

Small· Volume 20· Issue 51

Abstract

Abstract The Gate‐All‐Around Field‐Effect Transistor (GAAFET) is proposed as a successor to Fin Field‐Effect Transistor (FinFET) technology to increase channel length and improve the device performance. The GAAFET features a complex multilayer structure, which complicates the manufacturing process. One of the most critical steps in GAAFET fabrication is the selective lateral etching of the SiGe layers, essential for forming the inner‐spacer. Industry commonly encounters a non‐uniform etching profile during this step. In this paper, a continuous two‐step dry etching model is proposed to investigate the mechanism behind the formation of the non‐uniform profiles. The model consists of four modules: anisotropic etching simulation, Ge atom diffusion simulation, Si/SiGe etch selectivity calculation and SiGe selective etching simulation. By calibrating and verifying this model with experimental data, the edge rounding and gradient etching rates along the sidewall surface are successfully simulated. Based on further examination of the influence of chamber pressure on the profile using this model, the inner‐spacer shape is improved experimentally by appropriately reducing the chamber pressure. This work aims to provide valuable insights for etching process recipes in advanced GAAFETs manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Fabrication Technologies for Integrated Circuits Institute of Microelectronics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100029 China

School of Integrated Circuits University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049 China

School of Microelectronics Southern University of Science and Technology Shenzhen 518055 China

Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering The University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Road Hong Kong China

CDL for Multi‐Scale Process Modeling of Semiconductor Devices and Sensors Institute for Microelectronics TU Wien Viena 1040 Austria

Funding

Chinese Academy of Sciences

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. H.Mertens R.Ritzenthaler A.Hikavyy M.‐S.Kim Z.Tao K.Wostyn S. A.Chew A.De Keersgieter G.Mannaert E.Rosseel T.Schram K.Devriendt D.Tsvetanova H.Dekkers S.Demuynck A.Chasin E.Van Besien A.Dangol S.Godny B.Douhard N.Bosman O.Richard J.Geypen H.Bender K.Barla D.Mocuta N.Horiguchi A. V‐YThean In 2016 IEEE symp. on VLSI Technol. IEEE Honolulu HI USA September 2016 1–2.10.1109/VLSIT.2016.7573416 ↗
2. 10.1093/nsr/nwae00810.1093/nsr/nwae008 ↗
3. 10.1109/JEDS.2021.313091610.1109/JEDS.2021.3130916 ↗
4. 10.1109/JEDS.2017.268973810.1109/JEDS.2017.2689738 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mejo.2021.10514110.1016/j.mejo.2021.105141 ↗
6. 10.3390/nano1004079310.3390/nano10040793 ↗
7. A.Colonna Optimization of NS‐GAAFET technology through low‐κ dielectrics for spacer fabrication. Diss. Politecnico di Torino 2023.
8. 10.1116/6.000335710.1116/6.0003357 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.10.06110.1016/j.tsf.2013.10.061 ↗
10. M.Pelosi From FinFET to Nanosheet Si‐SiGe GAAFET: fabrication process simulation and analysis. Diss. Politecnico di Torino 2021.
11. 10.3390/nano1314212710.3390/nano13142127 ↗
12. N.Loubet S.Kal C.Alix S.Pancharatnam H.Zhou C.Durfee M.Belyansky N.Haller K.Watanabe T.Devarajan J.Zhang X.Miao M.Sankar M.Breton R.Chao A.Greene L.Yu J.Frougier D.Chanemougame K.Tapily J.Smith V.Basker A.Mosden P.Biolsi T. Q.Hurd R.Divakaruni B.Haran H.Bu in2019 IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) IEEE San Francisco CA USA February 2019 11–4.10.1109/IEDM19573.2019.8993615 ↗
13. 10.7567/JJAP.57.06JC0410.7567/JJAP.57.06JC04 ↗
14. 10.1149/2162-8777/ab80ae10.1149/2162-8777/ab80ae ↗
15. Catano C. · 2019 · 72
16. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.282.10710.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.282.107 ↗
17. 10.1149/09202.0003ecst10.1149/09202.0003ecst ↗
18. S.Manikandan N.Chauhan N.Bagga et al. 2022 IEEE Int. Conf. on Emerging Electronics (ICEE) IEEE Bangalore India December2022 1–4.10.1109/ICEE56203.2022.10117608 ↗
19. Shukla S. · Active and Passive Electronic Components · 2017 · 1
20. 10.1063/1.496459210.1063/1.4964592 ↗
21. 10.1002/ppap.20200001410.1002/ppap.202000014 ↗
22. 10.1116/6.000283810.1116/6.0002838 ↗
23. 10.1116/6.000303210.1116/6.0003032 ↗
24. Hu Z. · 2024 · 173
25. F.Krueger Modeling and Optimization of High Aspect Ratio Plasma Etching. Diss.2024.
26. 10.3390/mi1403066510.3390/mi14030665 ↗
27. 10.1116/1.59013510.1116/1.590135 ↗
28. 10.1088/0960-1317/21/6/06501710.1088/0960-1317/21/6/065017 ↗
29. J.Bobinac Process Simulation and Model Development in ViennaPS. Diss. Wien. 2023.
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.118510.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1185 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.10494210.1063/1.104942 ↗
32. 10.1109/TED.2022.320493410.1109/TED.2022.3204934 ↗
33. 10.1002/pssa.20082408510.1002/pssa.200824085 ↗
34. 10.3390/nano1410083710.3390/nano14100837 ↗
35. 10.1116/1.58097410.1116/1.580974 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.504184610.1063/1.5041846 ↗